One Way Ticket to Mars (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


subfever -> One Way Ticket to Mars (3/7/2014 5:15:28 PM)

We haven't even learned how to get along and live sustainably here on this planet, and now we're planning a colonization experiment on Mars???

Learn more here.




MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/7/2014 6:17:22 PM)

They could barely get the Biodome working on Earth when they had resources. A Mars colony at this point is an idiotic idea: we haven't even landed a human on that planet.

There is a difference between bravery and stupidity.

The more realistic plans involve using robot to set up orbital supply stations and set up a recovery mission first. More expensive? Yes. However astronauts are pretty thin on the ground (pun intended) and are very expensive too; that's not even counting the cost of life.




subfever -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/7/2014 6:44:48 PM)

Your points are valid, and it amazes me that over 200,000 people have already volunteered to go. Nevertheless, I truly feel we should first focus upon learning to live peacefully and sustainably on our planet.




MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/7/2014 7:21:14 PM)

Apples and oranges.

The possibility of expanding horizons could lead to less conflict here. Or more. Who knows?




subfever -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/7/2014 7:52:24 PM)

Sorry... I can't get past the "cart before the horse" feeling when I try to step back for a wider perspective. But tomorrow's another day. Who knows.




FrostedFlake -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/7/2014 11:14:01 PM)

Trying to make something out of Mars is one of those things everyone knows we are going to take whack at. But the Lemmings plan is not going to work here. I mean, there.

I think the fundamental problem is the overall lethality of the Martian environment. This would go right past the sort of person who thinks the environment is something other people keep trying to get him to give a fuck about. In fact, the environment is simply the conditions that prevail. And Mars sucks. It has almost no air. And it has just a few scattered bits of magnetosphere, so the radiation count is bad enough that air doesn't matter. You have to solve both these problems to make any progress at all. To solve either of them, you need asteroid mining equipment.

Making air is not tough. Breathable air is a trick. Probably best leave that to plants. But a magnetosphere could be as simple as a Tesla tower at each pole. Each pole pumping power into the ionosphere at opposite polarity, powering every piece of equipment on the planet from two power plants, wirelessly.




subfever -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/7/2014 11:27:25 PM)

The project appears to be privately funded. Given the tremendous costs, challenges, and risks involved... what do you believe is the true motivation behind the project?




ARIES83 -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 12:42:02 AM)

Spirit of adventure?
I doubt it will get off the ground anyway...
And yer Mars is pretty toxic as is, at the moment.

What can't you get your head around Subfever? You seem to think people or society need to change in some way before this becomes appropriate.

People will go there, and people will be people wherever they go.




PyrotheClown -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 1:09:36 AM)

I would personally like to volunteer the whole cast of jersey shore

we can figure out logistics later,just get snookie and the "situation" on the gawd damn rocket right now




FrostedFlake -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 1:23:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

The project appears to be privately funded. Given the tremendous costs, challenges, and risks involved... what do you believe is the true motivation behind the project?

I haven't taken these guys seriously enough to know about the money angle. When faced with a stated goal that is irrational, I tend to assume it is what it is. So I prefer to think they are probably honest idiots. Rather than con men. Preying on folks who want to go to Mars. But, it could be something else. It could be an attempt to measure the enthusiasm level among the nutty for the nutty. Think of it as a dipstick that tells you how many people there are of a certain specified purity of crazy. It seems there are 200,000 willing to go to Mars, one way, today. It is something to keep in mind when considering the nature of democracy.




MasterCaneman -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 6:57:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake

Trying to make something out of Mars is one of those things everyone knows we are going to take whack at. But the Lemmings plan is not going to work here. I mean, there.

I think the fundamental problem is the overall lethality of the Martian environment. This would go right past the sort of person who thinks the environment is something other people keep trying to get him to give a fuck about. In fact, the environment is simply the conditions that prevail. And Mars sucks. It has almost no air. And it has just a few scattered bits of magnetosphere, so the radiation count is bad enough that air doesn't matter. You have to solve both these problems to make any progress at all. To solve either of them, you need asteroid mining equipment.

Making air is not tough. Breathable air is a trick. Probably best leave that to plants. But a magnetosphere could be as simple as a Tesla tower at each pole. Each pole pumping power into the ionosphere at opposite polarity, powering every piece of equipment on the planet from two power plants, wirelessly.


Read Robert Zubrin's book The Case for Mars, and you'll see the overall plan isn't all that far-fetched. The 'no-return' option is puzzling, because there's already hardware available to make fuel for a return trip. As for the Tesla-style magnetosphere plan, it sounds good in theory, but you're talking about engineering on a truly astronomical level on a site with zero in-situ resources, such as roads, trucks, construction equipment. Raw materials are present, but you're literally have to land an entire manufacturing technology base onto the planet. Twice, since you're electrifying both the poles.

I'm in agreement this isn't a con job as much as it's a bellwether to see if the social climate is ready for the Next Big Thing, which is off-world colonization. Apparently, it is. So much the better, even if nothing further comes of this. All they're really trying to do is plant the seeds and see if they take.




LadyConstanze -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 7:11:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PyrotheClown

I would personally like to volunteer the whole cast of jersey shore

we can figure out logistics later,just get snookie and the "situation" on the gawd damn rocket right now



Maybe we can send them, the Kardashians and Justin Bieber up there on a "spy mission" and tell them it will be televised, it's a bit like a jungle camp, stylists and oxygen will be supplied in a few months.... A bit like that ship in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy...




theshytype -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 9:05:01 AM)

I'm all for it. Not for myself, though.

I like this planet way too much. I'd prefer to send those that make this one an inhospitable environment and those willing to go probably add nothing to this planet in a positive way. They seem to me to be too wrapped up in what's new and what's next to concern themselves with the now. They also seem like they're looking for a fresh start, but an easy way out. I'm all for dreaming and making dreams come true, but a balance of what's real is also needed.
If they can't hack it here, believe they can there, and discover they were wrong - not my problem.
The one way ticket idea almost sounds like a thought-out plan to permanently get rid of such people, but in a legal way.
Kind of works for me.




MasterCaneman -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 9:18:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: theshytype

I'm all for it. Not for myself, though.

I like this planet way too much. I'd prefer to send those that make this one an inhospitable environment and those willing to go probably add nothing to this planet in a positive way. They seem to me to be too wrapped up in what's new and what's next to concern themselves with the now. They also seem like they're looking for a fresh start, but an easy way out. I'm all for dreaming and making dreams come true, but a balance of what's real is also needed.
If they can't hack it here, believe they can there, and discover they were wrong - not my problem.
The one way ticket idea almost sounds like a thought-out plan to permanently get rid of such people, but in a legal way.
Kind of works for me.


Een other vords, Mars can be 'New Siberia', tovarich? Da! Is excellent vay to get reed of all undeeesirabools, nyet? [;)]




theshytype -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 9:24:05 AM)

I never considered my evil alter-ego to be Russian.




MasterCaneman -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 9:26:03 AM)

No, but mine is.




theshytype -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 9:33:07 AM)

Lol.

Well, then. If my alter ego is ever looking for an evil Russian alter-ego to plot with, I know where to go.
I'll have my alter-ego's people call your alter-ego's people.




MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 3:35:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

As for the Tesla-style magnetosphere plan, it sounds good in theory, but you're talking about engineering on a truly astronomical level

Picking nits: It's not astronomical, it's planetary.

Normally I'd let that go, but we are talking about colonization of another planet so let's not overstate the problems.

Planetary scale is still pretty difficult; it is rather easy to confuzzle the problems with "astronomical."




LadyConstanze -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 3:38:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MalcolmNathaniel


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

As for the Tesla-style magnetosphere plan, it sounds good in theory, but you're talking about engineering on a truly astronomical level

Picking nits: It's not astronomical, it's planetary.

Normally I'd let that go, but we are talking about colonization of another planet so let's not overstate the problems.

Planetary scale is still pretty difficult; it is rather easy to confuzzle the problems with "astronomical."



Don't effing tell the Kardashians, Justin Bieber, Jersey Shore Cast and all the other really annoying people, tell them there will be lots of cameras and they will be trend setters...




FrostedFlake -> RE: One Way Ticket to Mars (3/8/2014 3:44:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake

Trying to make something out of Mars is one of those things everyone knows we are going to take whack at. But the Lemmings plan is not going to work here. I mean, there.

I think the fundamental problem is the overall lethality of the Martian environment. This would go right past the sort of person who thinks the environment is something other people keep trying to get him to give a fuck about. In fact, the environment is simply the conditions that prevail. And Mars sucks. It has almost no air. And it has just a few scattered bits of magnetosphere, so the radiation count is bad enough that air doesn't matter. You have to solve both these problems to make any progress at all. To solve either of them, you need asteroid mining equipment.

Making air is not tough. Breathable air is a trick. Probably best leave that to plants. But a magnetosphere could be as simple as a Tesla tower at each pole. Each pole pumping power into the ionosphere at opposite polarity, powering every piece of equipment on the planet from two power plants, wirelessly.


Read Robert Zubrin's book The Case for Mars, and you'll see the overall plan isn't all that far-fetched. The 'no-return' option is puzzling, because there's already hardware available to make fuel for a return trip. As for the Tesla-style magnetosphere plan, it sounds good in theory, but you're talking about engineering on a truly astronomical level on a site with zero in-situ resources, such as roads, trucks, construction equipment. Raw materials are present, but you're literally have to land an entire manufacturing technology base onto the planet. Twice, since you're electrifying both the poles.

I'm in agreement this isn't a con job as much as it's a bellwether to see if the social climate is ready for the Next Big Thing, which is off-world colonization. Apparently, it is. So much the better, even if nothing further comes of this. All they're really trying to do is plant the seeds and see if they take.

You said that so well.

Suppose instead we hire the asteroid miners to make a bunch of bar magnets about the size of railroad ties. Thousands of them. Deliver half to each pole. In big foam balls that can be easily rounded up, herded around and driven to the railhead. There they get the stuffings knocked out of them, their innerds flung on a cart on a rail leading to a hole in the ground where the magnets all disappear from sight forever. Plenty of opportunities for horseplay with this project. But it might just work and once done, it's done. Unless you want to add more. A giant but finite project to deflect charged particles to the poles. A roof of a sort. No power, though. You will have to make do with a six legged lizard. It's not so bad. Six legged lizards eat big bugs.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1074219