Kirata
Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006 From: USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GotSteel Keep in mind that humanists and extreme fundimentalists have two very different ways of determining what is moral. We're going to base our decisions about right and wrong on the consequences (what's the harm; what's the benifit). Fundies don't do that, their morality is about rule following. If god says to murder your child then murding your child is good and not murdering your child is evil. It's a morality divorced from reality, so BM may well think you're an immoral cunt all the time that you're not oppressing gays. Whether or not any benefits obtain from a rule-following morality depends entirely on what the rules are. Following a set of rules without giving consideration to their impact on the lives of others certainly has only a very slim chance of contributing to the general happiness. But, that is hardly a criticism of rule-based moralities per se. Rules can be improved when they are not believed to be carved in stone as "God's will." So you are casting away the baby with the bathwater here, and adopting instead a consequentialist ethic that is deeply flawed. Basing judgments about right and wrong on the consequences of actions enshrines the principle that ends justify means. I don't think so, and neither does anyone else in their right mind. K.
< Message edited by Kirata -- 4/8/2014 4:13:25 PM >
|