Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 10:21:47 AM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin


However, I think (and I can't believe I'm typing this) the quote that you provided shows that tweak has a point, also.

Personally, I am hard-pressed to call something a religion that doesn't profess some kind of belief in some kind "higher" power.

not true, and I can only name one off the top of my head "church of all worlds" which has a central theme "thou are god" basicly saying you are god I am god everyone and everything is GOD, there are Pagan religions that believe in GIA which if I understand correctly is another world for NATURE AKA everything, there are also eastern religions who look at things similarly...

while I'll agree MOST religions have a central deity, its certainly not a REQUIREMNT



So, this "Church Of All Worlds" has a proclaimed deity? I didn't mean it had to be a singular deity; just a deity.

Gia? Same thing; a deity.

Anything that's accepted as a common focal point (even nature) to me, would be a "belief system".






I guess if you consider EVERYTHING a deity then OK

to be quite honest, if I understand the church of all worlds correctly, the whole premise of it was to REJECT deities and proclaim EVERYTHING GOD

when I think of deity I think of something singular or central not every atom in the universe

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 241
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:04:03 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
To answer your question regarding medical research, you may look to the Center of Disease Prevention, as one source.

That's still completely a non-answer. What do you think the CDC says and why should it make gay marriage illegal? Actually articulating your position requires addressing those questions.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I am baffled to a regular reference to the Holocaust, referring that " all religions" leads to this kind of sorrowful, unbelievable destruction and death.

That's not what was said and if you look at my source for religious homophobia you'll find that at present there's only a weak correlation between religion and racism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
TO me its like a hate speech toward Christians, Christians that had nothing to do with such a tragic past event, that sickens me.

I'm glad that you can't find the elements which led to the Holocaust in your belief system. That said the oppression of Jews by Catholics and Lutherans is well documented history. Martin Luther early in his career spoke out against Catholic persecution of Jews thinking that they wouldn't convert because they saw the same problems with Catholicism that he did. However, once he'd converted a good deal of Germany to his twue Christianity and found the Jewish people no more willing to convert he was scathing in his butt hurt. He wrote a 65.000 word piece of hate speech advocating for the violent oppression of the Jewish people entitled "The Jews and their Lies" here's a passage:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Martin Luther
What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews? Since they live among us, we dare not tolerate their conduct, now that we are aware of their lying and reviling and blaspheming. If we do, we become sharers in their lies, cursing and blasphemy. Thus we cannot extinguish the unquenchable fire of divine wrath, of which the prophets speak, nor can we convert the Jews. With prayer and the fear of God we must practice a sharp mercy to see whether we might save at least a few from the glowing flames. We dare not avenge ourselves. Vengeance a thousand times worse than we could wish them already has them by the throat. I shall give you my sincere advice:

First to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a stone or cinder of them. This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians, and do not condone or knowingly tolerate such public lying, cursing, and blaspheming of his Son and of his Christians. For whatever we tolerated in the past unknowingly ­ and I myself was unaware of it ­ will be pardoned by God. But if we, now that we are informed, were to protect and shield such a house for the Jews, existing right before our very nose, in which they lie about, blaspheme, curse, vilify, and defame Christ and us (as was heard above), it would be the same as if we were doing all this and even worse ourselves, as we very well know.

Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed. For they pursue in them the same aims as in their synagogues. Instead they might be lodged under a roof or in a barn, like the gypsies. This will bring home to them that they are not masters in our country, as they boast, but that they are living in exile and in captivity, as they incessantly wail and lament about us before God...


And it just keeps going on like that, 65,000 words. 65,000 words teaching his new denomination to hate and oppress the Jewish people. So when Lutherans set about violently oppressing the Jewish people it's not like their religious beliefs (taught to them by their denominations founder) that they should violently oppress the Jewish people were unrelated.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 242
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:11:31 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin
However, I think (and I can't believe I'm typing this) the quote that you provided shows that tweak has a point, also.

Personally, I am hard-pressed to call something a religion that doesn't profess some kind of belief in some kind "higher" power.

not true, and I can only name one off the top of my head "church of all worlds" which has a central theme "thou are god" basicly saying...


How about Scientology.

(in reply to BitYakin)
Profile   Post #: 243
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:27:41 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24

To answer your question regarding medical research, you may look to the Center of Disease Prevention, as one source.
I am baffled to a regular reference to the Holocaust, referring that " all religions" leads to this kind of sorrowful, unbelievable destruction and death. TO me its like a hate speech toward Christians, Christians that had nothing to do with such a tragic past event, that sickens me. Did Jewish people not emigrate to the United states, along to Palestine, and Israel mainly? We have a Holocaust museum in our community also. We don't hate Jewish people. I have no affiliation with the KKK, which is based on bigotry. I don't hate people of color! I don't hate homosexuals! I love all people, even if I don't agree with everything. THey don't agree with me either. And its okay.
When it comes to a vote, that comes to the time a voice is heard. I agree or disagree, and therefore since I am Christian, that means I vote in respect to my belief, and this means I treat the homosexual community badly? If you believe this, you are mistaken, we don't do this, not how we believe. I cant speak for other little branches, that may be bearing bad fruit in religion.

Chatterbox-
If by medical research you want to talk about things like STD's and HIV among gay men, specifically young gay men, that is fine, but as 'proof' that gays should be denied rights, that is asinine. First of all, one of the fastest growing rates of HIV is among women of color (take a look), are you going to say they don't deserve rights? STD's as a whole are quite common among young people, straight or gay, are you going to tell me they don't deserve rates? Last I checked, Lesbians have one of the lowest rates of STD's out there, lower than among hetero women, does that mean hetero women should be denied right? You are smearing a whole group of people by the actions of some; you whine that not all Christians are Fred Phelps,yet I could point out that roughly 30% of Americans are evangelical Christians, and among them, many of them share similar viewpoints, so how is that any different than you judging gays by statistics when I could do the same thing with Christians?

As far as you voting your faith, when you vote to deny a group of people rights based on your faith, you are being a bully, you are saying that rights granted to people should be put to in a popular plebiscite, that issues of morality are rightfully decided by a majority, and that is dead against what our system is supposed to be. The irony of this is lost on many of the religious who want to use their faith to determine rights, both Catholics and Evangelical protestants were saved by the first amendment, saved the kind of discrimination that they faced before the constitution, and it allowed them to grow and thrive, the separation of church and state they rail against allowed them to exist (do some reading on what Catholics were thought of in colonial america, and read what evangelical protestants, presbytyrians and methodists, faced from the Anglican majority, then come back and talk to me). Voting your faith sounds all great and good but the reason we have courts and a first amendment is people believe many things. The rednecks down south who created the Jim Crow system believed that blacks were inferior, and created a political system around it, how is that any different than your beliefs as law? When rights and privileges are denied people by any belief, rather than by hard facts, you are basically forcing others to live as you believe, same is true for school prayer or banning the right to access birth control. You have to realize that your beliefs are your own, and belief alone is not the problem, but when those beliefs turn into action that hurts others, then you are in trouble. Someone doesn't have to like Jews or Blacks, for example, but if they pass laws that hurt them or if they sit back and watch if a black or Jewish person is being hurt and do nothing, then they are basically saying they aren't human enough for me to worry about that.

In terms of the holocaust, it is much too long to write about the situation. No, modern Christians have nothing to do with it, but the history of Christianity in europe tells a different tale about the religion (again, I am talking about the way it was practiced, not what it was supposed to be). I wish people had read history, and I wish you would, Chatterbox, because some of your statements are patently false, probably because you don't know. Jews went to Palestine? Read up on a boat called the St. Louis, where refugees from the Nazis sailed for Palestine, and were turned away by the wonderful British authorities (don't get me going on the British and their fucked up relationship with the Arabs, they have a lot to answer for with the ills of the modern world, the Israeli mess is one of them). Also read up on Jewish immigration to the US, and how little was allowed, and why. Before the Swansea conference that laid out the final solution, in 1941, The Nazis were willing to deal with their "jewish problem" by making a deal to resettle them (there recently was a book about that, a novel, that hinged upon one of the ideas, settling Jews in Alaska of all places, actually had happened), and there were talks between the US and Germany. The deal was scuttled because of rabid anti semitism (keep in mind that the America First movement's sympathies were more close to the Nazis), and among those who raised a ruckus were the evangelical Christians (especially the leaders of the Southern Baptist community) and the Catholic Bishops, led by Spellman, who opposed any mass settling of the Jews here, Spellman according to a memoir written by Henry Morgenthau, FDR's treasury secretary, told FDR that if he tried to settle those "Christ Killers" in the US the church would tell their people to vote for anyone who opposed it....).

Most of the people who carried out the holocaust or sat and watched it happen were Christian, too. German troops on their belt buckles had the words "Mitt und Gans" on it, "with our God", and Germans were church going people, Catholic and Lutheran. While only the Catholic church in germany signed the non aggression pact with Hitler, the Christian churches in Germany did very little to try and help the Jews, and the churches there firmly supported in public statements the Nuremberg laws that turned Jews into non Citizens. The Catholic Church through the vatican claimed it was afraid to anger the Nazis, yet the Pope issues 16 encyclicals condemning the Nazis for interfering with the church, and also over issues like Euthenizing handicapped people, yet they issues not one such document about the Jews.

What you are missing is that while most Christians in Europe problem did not directly do anything to kill the Jews, that most of them also when faced with the obvious, when Jews started losing rights, when they were being forced into Ghettos or simply disappeared, in many cases pretended it wasn't happening. The functionaries of France who happily ran the bureaucracy that helped the Jews be deported, the people who saw Jewish neighbors being rounded up and did nothing, the people who during Krystalnacht went on a rampage against Jews, all of them were Christians, and they were able to do this, and the reason is that the Jews were so demonized for centuries, and the churches fanned that, instead of saying Jews were fellow human beings who after all were the same people as our Savior, spread the filth of the blood libel, and spread the idea that the jews were responsible for Christ's death,when my dad was growing up a common name for Jews was "those damn Christ Killers" among the Irish and Italian Catholics he grew up among. Anti semitisim is taught behavior, and it doesn't come out of physical differences, it doesn't come out of body odor or eye color, it comes about because in large part the Christian faith spent a lot of time on demonizing Jews, in large party because they saw Jews as rivals.

The Christianity of Christ is not responsible for this, the written faith is not, but what men did with it for hundreds and hundreds of centuries did. When the RC finally changed the Good Friday homily to pull out the claims that the Jews were responsible for Jesus death, they acknowledged that that and things like Passion plays that featured Jews as the bad guys had led to oppression of the Jews and towards anti semitism in general, and they later acknowledged in a pastoral from the vatican called "We Remember" that the church fostered anti semtiism, allowed it to flourish, in part because many of those running the church were anti semitic.

The thing you have to remember is events like the Holocaust are not created overnight, that that kind of hate that can allow that to happen festers over long periods of time. The tribal strife in Africa, the hatred in Northern Ireland, the racism of slavery and then Jim Crow, didn't pop up out of the ground, they are the products of many centuries of belief, cultural and/or religious, that flourish. It is one of life's ironies that the Jews had their best treatment for the most part under the rule of Moslems, whether it be in places like Grenada or in the Ottoman empire. By today's standards it wasn't ideal, but compared to what Jews faced in "Christian" europe, it was light years better.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 244
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:38:38 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

I'm not sure what would make anyone "religious" or otherwise qualify extreme and/or terror groups as "religious." They might claim to be "religious," but then again, if they don't even follow the edicts and principles of their own stated belief system, then they might be more like political opportunists - using religion for their own personal gain.

Of course, one can also find similar opportunists within secular political ideologies as well, so there's really no difference between religion and politics in that regard.

It is not difficult to find justification for all kinds of mayhem and abhorrent practices in the Bible and Koran, so I have to question that claim. And consider this definition of religion from dictionary.com:

2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons

Obviously, this is worthless. And the problem is a serious one in a society where religion enjoys Constitutional protection. I think there is much to be gained from defining religion in a way that denies protection to teachings and practices that serve to divide humanity and set a man against his neighbor. I'm sure some the proponents of what passes for "religion" these days might not like that very much, but I would be inclined to regard their objections as underscoring the need for such.

Granted, people can think as they wish and say whatever they want. But subsidizing such nonsense through tax exemptions and subverting our cherished ideals in order to avoid charges of "religious discrimination" incur costs that go beyond just dollars and cents.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/15/2014 2:24:39 PM >

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 245
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:41:45 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
It is funny, people of Faith, especially Christians, go on and on about how the Church and faith shaped western civilization, was so influential on the shaping of our civilization, how "God fearing Christian men" founded the US, yet suddenly when it comes to the darkness that was the holocaust, it was like "don't blame Christianity, don't blame the church", and that is an utter bullshit copout.


I would not credit Christianity with shaping Western Civilization, nor would I blame Christianity for its failures and atrocities - at least not entirely. I'm definitely a critic of religion and Christianity, but I also try to guard against unfairly singling them out or scapegoating Christians as a group. As I suggested in an earlier post, politicians will use religion or whatever philosophical ideal they can latch onto to gain power, wealth, etc. The Holocaust was more the result of malignant nationalism, which has some significant ideological conflicts with religion.



Western civilization was shaped by many things, starting with the Ancient Greeks, the Romans, but Christianity became the predominant force in western europe and its various facets were closely tied in with how things evolved,up until the reformation there was no such thing as a split between nation and state, the political and the religious were tied. Likewise, in terms of education, until the 18th century all the universities and schools were tied to religion, when Newton was at Cambridge he became ordained Clergy, there was no separation. When the church decided someone was blasphemous, they turned the person over to the civic authorities to be punished (I love when Catholics tell me "the church didn't punish people, civic authorities did".........like, who do you think accused them?). Christianity in its many forms did, the political reformations of the enlightenment, of people like Locke and Rousseau, in large part came about when the protestant split happened, and the idea that a person had the direct connection to God, rather than needing church and clergy, also led to the idea of a ruler's power coming to him through the people, who in turn had been blessed by God; whereas the dominant thought before the reformation, preached by the church, was that Rulers got their power through God directly and ruled by divine intervention (divine right of Kings), so the changes in Christianity affected western civilization. The ideas of charity that run through western civilization (and don't exist, for example, as strongly in cultures like Japan and China, whose dominant religions do not preach as strongly protecting the weak and poor) came from Christian belief. Christianity was tied up heavily in education, with the universities and such, private universities only started coming about in the 19th century, secular univerisities, so religion influenced so many things, and in Europe it was Christianity.

As far as the holocaust, calling it nationalism is true, but also very, very not the whole picture. The holocaust came about because the Jews were blamed for the loss in WWI, that the Germans were a superior nation of superior people and the only way they lost, they were betrayed; but what that leaves out is why the Jews were singled out, why it became about them primarily. The nationalism is a no brainer, William Manchester in his "Arms of Krupp" points out that after Germany unified after smashing the French in 1870, the Germans, after centuries of being the whipping boy of europe, the weak sister, suddenly rallied around the Prussians and adopted this idea of being 'superior', an illusion that came crashing to the ground in 1918. The allies stupidly did not occupy Germany (one of the biggest mistakes in history), so the military, trying to cover their asses, told people "we were never occupied, we never lost, we were betrayed")..and guess who was responsible? Right, the Jews, and want to know what was commonly said."Well, how could we ever trust the Jews, after all it was the Jews who betrayed our Savior".....the fact that they were looking for a scapegoat is nationalism, the fact they turned to the Jews as the scapegoat was long held anti semitism, and much of that came from the support the churches gave to anti semitism.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 246
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:42:41 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
Chatterbox-
If by medical research you want to talk about things like STD's and HIV among gay men, specifically young gay men, that is fine, but as 'proof' that gays should be denied rights, that is asinine.


I hope it's not something that dumb because if one was actually worried about the spread of HIV among a demographic then the more of said demographic one could convince to form lifelong monogamous relationships (i.e. marriage) the better.

< Message edited by GotSteel -- 3/15/2014 1:44:39 PM >

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 247
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:49:19 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
When it comes to a vote, that comes to the time a voice is heard. I agree or disagree, and therefore since I am Christian, that means I vote in respect to my belief, and this means I treat the homosexual community badly?

There are other people who manage to be Christian without oppressing homosexuals just like you (unlike many of your predecessors) manage to be Christian without oppressing Jews. Being Christian doesn't require that you treat the homosexual community badly. Voting against equal rights for homosexuals means you treat the homosexual community badly.


(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 248
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 1:58:06 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel


quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
To answer your question regarding medical research, you may look to the Center of Disease Prevention, as one source.

That's still completely a non-answer. What do you think the CDC says and why should it make gay marriage illegal? Actually articulating your position requires addressing those questions.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
I am baffled to a regular reference to the Holocaust, referring that " all religions" leads to this kind of sorrowful, unbelievable destruction and death.

That's not what was said and if you look at my source for religious homophobia you'll find that at present there's only a weak correlation between religion and racism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
TO me its like a hate speech toward Christians, Christians that had nothing to do with such a tragic past event, that sickens me.

I'm glad that you can't find the elements which led to the Holocaust in your belief system. That said the oppression of Jews by Catholics and Lutherans is well documented history. Martin Luther early in his career spoke out against Catholic persecution of Jews thinking that they wouldn't convert because they saw the same problems with Catholicism that he did. However, once he'd converted a good deal of Germany to his twue Christianity and found the Jewish people no more willing to convert he was scathing in his butt hurt. He wrote a 65.000 word piece of hate speech advocating for the violent oppression of the Jewish people entitled "The Jews and their Lies" here's a passage:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Martin Luther
What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews? Since they live among us, we dare not tolerate their conduct, now that we are aware of their lying and reviling and blaspheming. If we do, we become sharers in their lies, cursing and blasphemy. Thus we cannot extinguish the unquenchable fire of divine wrath, of which the prophets speak, nor can we convert the Jews. With prayer and the fear of God we must practice a sharp mercy to see whether we might save at least a few from the glowing flames. We dare not avenge ourselves. Vengeance a thousand times worse than we could wish them already has them by the throat. I shall give you my sincere advice:

First to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a stone or cinder of them. This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians, and do not condone or knowingly tolerate such public lying, cursing, and blaspheming of his Son and of his Christians. For whatever we tolerated in the past unknowingly ­ and I myself was unaware of it ­ will be pardoned by God. But if we, now that we are informed, were to protect and shield such a house for the Jews, existing right before our very nose, in which they lie about, blaspheme, curse, vilify, and defame Christ and us (as was heard above), it would be the same as if we were doing all this and even worse ourselves, as we very well know.

Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed. For they pursue in them the same aims as in their synagogues. Instead they might be lodged under a roof or in a barn, like the gypsies. This will bring home to them that they are not masters in our country, as they boast, but that they are living in exile and in captivity, as they incessantly wail and lament about us before God...


And it just keeps going on like that, 65,000 words. 65,000 words teaching his new denomination to hate and oppress the Jewish people. So when Lutherans set about violently oppressing the Jewish people it's not like their religious beliefs (taught to them by their denominations founder) that they should violently oppress the Jewish people were unrelated.


Got-

Thanks for your support over religion and anti semitism. I have heard discrimination against Jews being about 'racism', but the reality is Judaism is a religious faith, one that the Christians had as official belief for a long long time blamed for the death of Christ, but more importantly, the Temple leaders were not exactly kind to followers of Christ, and later on, the church saw Judaism as a rival religion/power base, and their demonization of it and its followers was a political move as well.

As far as the CDC,what he will do is cite the stats on STD's and AIDS, where young gay men make up the largest group, and sadly that is true.His argument is like many of the 'true believers', that STD's and AIDS are proof gays shouldn't be allowed to marry (ironic, isn't it, that they are blaming gay men for being promiscuous, yet want to deny them the right to have a (presumably) monagamous marriage). Course it leaves out that gay women have some of the lowest rates of STD's, that young straight people have higher rates of STD's then the population as a whole, and that study after study has shown that gay or straight, the average number of sex partners for both groups is pretty much the same....I heard that once from this pastor of one of the true believer black churches, how gay people are all these sexually promiscuous, animalistic people who shouldn't be allowed to marry and he cited stats like this.....someone nailed the hypocritical SOB, when they pointed out that a)the rate of STD's among young blacks, especially men, was higher than average and b)that 80% of black kids were born out of wedlock, so how come we shouldn't deny blacks the right to marry, since they treat it so shabbily? Of course, the minister went on how that was different, how that was racism, destroyed marriages, but he totally missed the point, that statistics don't tell the whole story (it never dawned on him that the promiscuity he is talking about might in part not be about another form of bigotry, the homophobia that gays faced).....I have heard this justification all over the place, and it is basically the religious trying to find some 'harm' they can stick to gays to justify their willingness to deny them rights....it would be no different than when a someone cited the blood libel as a reason to discriminate against Jews, it is they don't have a logical/rational argument for their hate/beliefs, so they concoct it. Even if 80% of gay men were promiscuous (they aren't, the stats are made up by a relative minority of gay men who are hypersexual), that doesn't justify banning it, what about the 20% who aren't? What about the gay couples we see who have been together 40 years? Or gay women, who the joke is on their second date bring a u-haul.....Anti gay bigots then say "gays will destroy marriage", but who the fuck is any straight person to judge that, when 50% of straight marriages end in divorce?

Anyway, thank you for citing Luther, there have literally been whole shelves of books written on the role of religion and the holocaust, both from the standpoint of what happened during the runup to it and the actual event, and the influence religion had that led to it.

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 249
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 2:10:51 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline
It is easy to have religious faith without worshipping a deity as such. The idea of a theistic being/deity is not shared among all religions (and the construct of God as a being is anthropomorphism, creating God in our image cause we can understand it). In Neo pagan circles many believe that God is a divine energy that flows through all things in the universe (is the universe), and rather than worshipping deity, rather worship the divine in everything or respect the divine in everything, and when they do their equivalent of prayer it is connecting the divine energy in themselves to connect with the energy in the broader universe, to shape things or influence things..no being, no deity, yet it is a religious belief since there can be no proof of that being truth, too. Other people see things like God as a metaphor for something we cannot understand, so they don't worship "God the father" the way a true believer would, they see God as God, whatever that is, and don't think God is going to get angry if they don't think he is an old guy in a robe, or someone they need to kneel and grovel too *shrug*........

One of the more encouraging things I see is that the fastest growing group of the religious is people who are saying "all of the above", they take from anything that makes sense to them, connects them to something bigger, ad they don't care if it is from Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Islam, doesn't matter. Most Catholics reserve the right to believe as they see fit, only about 30% of Catholics believe they have to take as Gospel anything the church teachers, mainstream protestanism has always reserved a large chunk of the faith on the individual (three legged stool and all that), and I think this is how it should be, because it takes off that edge that says "this is the only truth", the idea that what you believe is more important than how you carry it out, and stops hopefully someone from looking at another and saying "they are wrong, I am right" but rather understand that maybe they have a point....same sex marriage is a good point, I am astounded how fast it is taking hold, but in large part it is because people have realized that there is another side to this, when they see gays as human beings wanting to have families, fight for them, it is kind of idiotic to sit back and say no, when on the other hand believing families are so important..or even if not understanding gays, realizing that denying them rights is denying the fact that 'there but the grace of God go I", that if I let my beliefs decide what rights others have, why couldn't others do that to me? Of course, the other reason is that as more and more places have legalized same sex unions, despite what the GOP and the conservative religious figures claim, the world hasn't come to an end, the issues 'normal' married couples face hasn't changed, God hasn't buried the world in white castle hamburgers (much more evil than a flood IMO *lol*), and they start thinking what all the fuss was about...

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 250
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 2:35:14 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

the fact they turned to the Jews as the scapegoat was long held anti semitism, and much of that came from the support the churches gave to anti semitism.

The Holocaust Museum documents the roots (including religion) of German/European anti-Semitism extensively. It's one of the most heartbreaking exhibits I've ever seen.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 251
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 4:16:37 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline
Matthew 7 vs. 6



_____________________________

I am like a box of chocolates, you never know what variety you are going to get on any given day.

My crazy smells like jasmine, cloves and cat nip.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 252
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 4:44:10 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

Voting against equal rights for homosexuals means you treat the homosexual community badly.

For hundreds of years, and from the founding of our country, heterosexuals have called the committed union of a man and a woman a "marriage". I can see no argument against the government recognizing the committed unions of homosexuals, but that is not what the gay community is asking for.

Instead, they are telling the heterosexual community, "We want that word to apply to our unions too. If you don't like it, fuck you. Tough shit. Go find another."

Some people don't like that attitude, regardless of whether or not they have any aversion to homosexuality, be it religious or otherwise, and even if they support affording homosexual unions equal recognition and rights. And it is a general rule that you will always get more respect by giving some.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/15/2014 4:56:38 PM >

(in reply to GotSteel)
Profile   Post #: 253
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 4:53:21 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
we want your word?
truly??? LMFAO
the selfish selfish bastards


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 254
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 4:55:57 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

we want your word?
truly??? LMFAO
the selfish selfish bastards

Yeah well, poor phrasing. Edited.

K.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 255
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 7:36:28 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

We want that word to apply to our unions too.

Indeed we do. If one truly believes that our unions merit "equal recognition and rights," why not accord them the same noun?

Might it be to ensure--linguistically, at least--that everyone knows, deep down, those that gay guys down the street, however committed or united or devoted as parents, aren't really, truly, exactly equal to their straight neighbors?



< Message edited by dcnovice -- 3/15/2014 8:15:35 PM >


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 256
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 7:45:16 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Matthew 7 vs. 6


Okay . . .

“Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces." (KJV)

Who are the dogs/swine in your view? What are the pearls?

BTW, as a church lady myself, I have to say I cringe when I read your posts. Again and again, your words make all believers sound like morons.

< Message edited by dcnovice -- 3/15/2014 7:49:56 PM >


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 257
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 7:50:52 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

Kirata
Theology and philosophy may purport to offer the answers, but the problem is that you are obliged to take them on faith. The more pertinent question is how can we know? How can we know whether or not there is a "higher" something in the first place, let alone its nature?

That is what religious and yogic practices address, and they do not ask you to "believe" in anything in order to practice them. I am only expressing my own personal opinion, of course, but I am not alone in thinking along these lines. See for example: What is religion? (4:50).

And here's another thought. If by a higher "power" you mean something like a God, for example, who is above the world, separate from it and ruling over it, then you are saying that you don't consider anything a religion that doesn't teach the view it pleases you to hold. Really?

In any case, my view hardly rules out a higher reality.


The issue here is not the inherent merit or accuracy of your definition of 'religion'. FWIW, I quite like your approach without endorsing it completely.

The issue I have trying to put to you is this: your understanding of 'religion' is at considerable variance to the everyday understanding of that term. Thus we see several posts from believers questioning your definition. Some of your remarks about "what passes for religion these days" suggest you are aware of the distance between your definiton and the everyday understanding of the term.

The refusal to ackowlegde the role played by beliefs in religion is puzzling. If religion is, as you assert, a kind of system of ethical/yogic practices, on what basis are these practices selected? Whatever standard is used to select these practices, it must employ some system of belief (or values, which in this instance amounts to pretty much the same thing) in order to distinguish between useful practices and the rest.

However, the main issue with your definiton is that, regardless of its inherent merit, it is simply not what most people understand religion to be. Your definition is so far removed from the everyday understanding that I feel it is best conveyed by another term completely. Perhaps ethical practices might suit. Or spiritual practices. Or another term. The choice is yours.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 3/15/2014 8:39:27 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 258
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 8:02:42 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

For hundreds of years, and from the founding of our country, heterosexuals have called the committed union of a man and a woman a "marriage".

Words evolve. Always have, always will.

That's particularly true for "marriage." In its long history, it's referred to polygamous unions (legally recognized in nearly 50 countries today), arranged marriages meant to advance dynastic and economic interests, households in which the woman was her husband's chattel with few if any rights of her own, love matches between equals, and God knows what else. The idea that "marriage" has ever had a single definition that fits all times and all places is, to borrow from the Book of Common Prayer, "a fond thing, vainly invented."

As for heterosexuals' use of the word "marriage," I know plenty of straight folks who delight in extending it to their LGBT brothers and sisters. They include my bishop and parish priests, relatives, friends, and local legislators.


< Message edited by dcnovice -- 3/15/2014 8:12:28 PM >


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 259
RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as raci... - 3/15/2014 8:18:46 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
Matthew 7 vs. 6


Certaintly you can't be considering "medical research" to be holy so what do you mean when you say "medical research"? Telling me it's from the CDC is like telling me to look for a needle in a haystack. Now Njlauren is assuming that you're making a stereotypical post hoc rationalization that bigots use to justify their hate.

I'm hoping that you've come up with something more intellectually original than that, am I being overly optimistic?

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 260
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: "Religion will become as unacceptable as racism" Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125