FieryOpal -> RE: Vanilla Sex? (3/10/2014 8:20:11 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote:
ORIGINAL: pg4g Ok, so by vanilla I suppose I'm referring to: 1. No dominance or controlling person. Both are equals in it, no power dynamic, no one is in control. Both treat each others as equal in love making. 2. No pain-related or any kinky activities. Simple vaginal, anal or oral sex. 3. No bondage elements. 4. No scenes, just sexual love making. Sort of a time-out from the power dynamic and kink, and just enjoying each other, like a traditional romance movie. I think you'll be hard-pushed to find people that fit into your exclusion list. For #1, almost every relationship, be it married, BF/GF etc, Pro/client, will almost always have some form of power dynamic because there is very rarely a situation where nobody is in charge. For #2, many "dead straight" people would consider anal and/or oral sex to be 'kinky'. So I don't see your list being very definitive. BDSM is a sliding scale from no sex to full-on in any and every hole plus other stuff thrown in. To me, there is no such thing as 'vanilla' sex - it just depends where on that sliding scale your preferences fit. So to answer your question: yes, always and no, never - both. Because I do not see, or acknowledge, your particular definitions of what is and what is not 'vanilla'. You'll have to excuse me, pg4g, for having to redefine what constitutes "vanilla sex" in order to answer your original question properly. For simplicity's sake, I'll divide the general adult population into two categories. Those who go through the motions. These are the biologically driven, a category which doesn't register on my personal radar screen. Then there are those of us who actually enjoy sex to the utmost and approach it as love-making. If you can humor me further, I'll divide "vanilla sex" into two generic categories: Ordinary vanilla and kinky vanilla. For my purposes, I'm referring to straight sex. When I was growing up, oral sex was not considered to be an ordinary sexual activity. For some vanillas it still isn't. I was reading sex manuals in my teens which had to dispel the notion that this was aberrant sexual behavior. [8|] Anal sex is still considered to be rather taboo by straight vanillas, although according to the author of Sex and History, it has been a method of 100% effective birth control for centuries utilized by straight couples for its obvious non-procreativity. To me, ordinary (pro-creative) vanilla sex and kinky vanilla sex aren't separate from one another. My private dividing line is between this and BDSM kinky. D/s is D/s, and I would venture to say just about every interpersonal relationship is based on a power (im)balance and/or exchange, which may or may not have anything to do with sex. According to the above definitions, HELL YEAH. I couldn't do and wouldn't want to cross the line over to BDSM kinky unless vanilla sex was an integral interwoven part of the equation and/or the culmination of every erotic interlude. BDSM by itself, with non-sexual physical contact means nothing to me in that it holds no appeal for me, in the same way that casual FWB sex or a one-night stand lacks the true intimacy I require.
|
|
|
|