RE: An gentler way.... bullshit (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


joether -> RE: An gentler way.... bullshit (3/16/2014 2:08:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
if you are going to give amnesty to illegal aliens, you might as well give it to drug dealers

There's a twisted bit of "logic."

[1] Entering the country is illegal, correct? Why reward someone for breaking the law?

[2] And yeah, the reason illegals are on welfare is because they get screwed in pay for their work.

[3] However, if they would have come here legally, then they have protection that would prevent that.

[4] This crap that they are coming here illegally for a better life so we should let them stay is for the birds. They rarely pay taxes, hence the federal revenues are impacted, they use public schools without paying any school taxes, but all of that is perfectly okay with people that dont want to send them back and keep em from coming back, right?


I have to agree with Musicmystery. Your logic is totally twisted....

[1]: No one is rewarding them for breaking a law. The McCain/Kennedy bill I mention states what the penalties for each tier. The last tier, the one were people have been in the country the longest have already paid a penalty far greater than you can imagine. The have lived very day in fear of being deported. An yet, what have they done since being here?

[2]: The reason illegal are on welfare is NOT because their pay is miserable. The immigration laws of this nation were created in a totally different era than the one the nation finds itself in today. They have to live 'under the radar' due to circumstances NOT because they want to. They take jobs that are off the record, because minimum wage jobs produce legal/financial documents.

But then, we have numerous citizens who are NOT illegal aliens, working at minimum wage and are on welfare. So while Wal-Mart and other businesses pay these people so little, they earn record net profits. As it concerns conservatives, Republicans and the Tea Party? Those citizens and illegal aliens are one and the same. They should have NOTHING. No access to anything, since according to the three groups I just mentioned, believe the two groups are 'taking fro the system'.

I really do not know why this is a tough concept for you to understand...

[3]: If the immigration system and laws....WORKED....it wouldn't be to much of a problem. But that takes an act by Congress. Further, as we learn which parts of the new law that do not work in a practical function, adding a bill to fix it would take this...ANOTHER...act of Congress. Our Congress right now cant even agree to let Representative 'X' have two assistants, let alone handle something the size of the immigration debate!

[4]: Rarely pay taxes? Given that their income sucks, its fair to say they would not normally pay much in taxes. Neither do financially poor or homeless US Citizens. Curious how you have no love for your fellow citizens in dire financial straits either. Both grounds make up for their financial insignificance in other ways. None of those seem to be ones your aware or informed on. An as I said above, there is no 'illegal discount' in the manner conservative talk radio shows claim there to be. ANYONE that buys gas for their vehicle in America from a commercial property....PAYS....TAXES. Here is a helpful guide on gas taxes in the USA.

How about state taxes on groceries? I guess according to your 'well informed status', illegal aliens do not have to pay, right? How about sales tax at the local and state levels? I guess they don't pay local or state taxes on anything they buy, right? Since they have that 'illegal alien discount', right?





MrRodgers -> RE: An gentler way.... bullshit (3/16/2014 8:11:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Do what we did in the past to 10's of 1000's...put them right into the army.

Does being part American Indian (which is what most people really mean) really make a difference when it was the other part that...came here illegally ? I am 100% American native and of Irish decent.

I really would like the big picture on just how much money in benefits do go to illegals. I can't imagine it is too much more if as much as say one or two B2 bombers. Again, maybe they'd be cost-effective if we sent them off to fight our wars hey ? (see above)

I wonder how this comports with Obama deporting more at the border than any other previous admin, ? I wonder if big agric., isn't behind this ?

But hey, if I was an American capitalist I don't care about the taxes because I am paying only about 1/2 or less than most of you suckers anyway. IF, I was an American capitalist.

We haven't bought a B-52 in over 50 years

What about it ? I refer to B2 bombers for which the taxpayers are still being raped. I know for a fact that just the software contractor for the B2...still gets $2 billion a year as that co....Logicon is a tenant in a 250,000 sq. ft. bldg in FFX, Va. that I helped try to refinance and wasn't allowed because the lender was foreign.

My apologies, for some reason my eyes were playing tricks on me and I saw 52 instead of 2
I agree wholeheartedly with letting them earn citizenship through military service.

No big deal...except the pentagon the fair-haired child of the rights spending priorities.




DesideriScuri -> RE: An gentler way.... bullshit (3/16/2014 8:44:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
quote:

it is not my burden to pay taxes to cover...

Ah, if only I could chose where to spend my tax dollars...
[image]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LLGXA4uXFD4/UL_0-WJPeaI/AAAAAAAAF9w/AwYnHF-qoKI/s1600/corporate_tax_shift_harvard.jpg[/image]


You're making the mistake that a corporation's income isn't the corporation's income. You seem to think that reducing the amount of taxes owed to the Federal government is, somehow, a subsidy, when it's simply the corporation not having more of it's own income expropriated. It's a very common fallacy among those that lean to the left.

The only time it's actually a subsidy is when the net tax income is a gain for the taxpayer. That is, if I pay $X in taxes throughout the year, if my tax refund at the end of the year is equal to or less than $X, it isn't subsidy. If I get back more than I paid in, then the difference certainly is a subsidy.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
9.326172E-02