avox -> RE: Male Female attitudes about risqué dress - some interesting insights underlying inherent processes (4/12/2014 10:23:28 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Darkfeather welcome to the 21st century... Indeed. quote:
ORIGINAL: Chwilfrydig What about the men's choice of vestments? Or rather, their lack of vestments, as evidenced by the overwhelming plethora of cock shots on this site. Along that vein, the world flips upside down between real and online. For example, I noticed at the real-world university that it was the men (kids mostly, in their teens and twenties) who were universally in casual jeans, sneakers, Ts, and sweatshirts. However, it was the women who were showing camel toes, most of their boobs, and half their buns. I wasn't looking, but I doubt a single cock was hanging out whereas plenty of boobs and buns were there for all to see. Likewise, I just ran a search here, and saw plenty of boobs and buns here too, so the women seem to act the same in both real and online whereas the men seem to go all out with the cock shot here, but not in the real world. There's something to be learned from that clearly obvious circumstance - but I'm not likely the one to know how exactly to interpret the fact that the women use their clothing (or lack thereof) as a tool all the time while the men only seem to employ the cock shot here, but not in the stated university setting. quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP Women ... dress for other women and themselves. Yeah, everyone has heard that. And women don't marry for money either. You have to decide if there is any logic in what you say, and what I'm looking for is logical thought. It is incomprehensible to me that all those boobs and camel toes were for other women. Maybe they are (I'm not a woman); but I don't subscribe to the theory that women are cutting their pants off above at angles that show half their buns for the other women out there to view, nor are they doing it for "themselves". quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP If it's 90 out and the guys are in shorts with no shirts, then why shouldn't a woman be able to strip down to shorts and a sports bra? Good question. A nipple is a nipple. I think most laws which bother to define public obscenity do so setting their sights on a woman's nipple but not a man's nipple. Why? Makes no logical sense. But, I do know that, for me, seeing a man's nipple has no effect, but seeing a woman bra less in the university library has the desired effect. quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP Yet you think that she's doing it to get attention. It's not true. Logic tells me there can be no other reason. But, that's why I asked. And where the hell did the "rape card" get pulled out from?
|
|
|
|