Chwilfrydig -> Those things on your feet... (4/18/2014 9:28:56 AM)
|
Even before the recent confession by "Rick" that he (supposedly) created a slew of sock puppets, I have spent some time thinking about this type of sock. Being thought of as one myself by a few people probably increased my interest <grin>. I'm only talking about Rick's type of sock puppetry here - creating profiles to post questions and engage discussion based on elaborately crafted (and made up) situations. Many of his creations DID spur a lot of discussion, and the responses offered were, in many cases, heartfelt and informative. Years ago I got interested in the Seth books by Jan Roberts. This is a lady who claimed to channel and speak through an alien entity. This entity offered an extensive and detailed view on the nature of physical reality. Did I believe she channeled an alien? It didn't matter to me if she did or not, because I found the ideas fascinating and in many cases, valid for me. I feel the same way about Rick's type of sock puppetry. Yes, it's inherently wrong to portray yourself as something you're not, but this IS the internet after all. It happens. A lot. My point is that I don't feel the discussion generated by a post is invalidated because the OP turns out to be a sock. I don't think people who responded as if it were true are lessened in any way when/if the truth comes out. This is just my opinion, and I'm new - I wasn't around for the whole <not about to type the name> situation which sounds like it hurt a lot of folks in the end. I certainly wouldn't encourage or condone anyone who creates this type of sock. I'm just saying that the thoughts and ideas in response to such a sock can be valuable on their own. The socks can laugh at everyone and think it's all a hilarious game, but I think those who have truly benefited from replying to or following the socks' discussions have the last laugh.
|
|
|
|