|
tweakabelle -> RE: War criminal Blair calls for more wars . and war crimes (4/26/2014 12:10:41 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
We get that you want to tear down the whole western order tweak.
What? Poor little meeeeeee? Destroy Western civilisation all on my ownio??? You flatter me!
quote:
Fortunately,we're not quite so idiotic as you think.
You might benefit from obtaining a second opinion about that.
quote:
The idea of 'universal jurisdiction' is simply laughable.
The UCC has no jurisdiction in the US, China, Russia, venezuela, cuba, Iran, North Korea or in dozens of dictatorships.
As my previous post made crystal clear it is an established principle of international law following the Pinochet case. You mightn't like it but that doesn't alter its status. It remains an established principle of international law whether you like it or not. However reacting with blanket denial to anything they dislike tells us a lot about an individual.
quote:
As for Blair being a war criminal - thats just leftist wet dreams.
Lets engage, for a minute, and entertain your farce. What exact war crimes do you charge Blair with?
Did he give the order for the elimination of a race? Torture millions?
What exact crime - other than not being left - do you accuse him of?
Crimes against humanity arising out of the Iraq disaster.
quote:
And when we talk about crimes against humanity you and gotsteel gleefully call for the prosecution of catholic bishops but won't condemn muslim pedophilia.
So who do you think is guilty of a bigger crime against humanity? Harmid Karzai who has done nothing to surpress Basha boys in Afghanistan (one million current cases) or Blair?
How about Khomeini? Iran's leader allows the marriage of 'adopted' girls under 13 - some as young as 9. And as an aside authorized the payment of $25000 per incident of suicide bombers against Israel. In the Iran/Iraq war, they rounded up dissidents and used them as a human shield for the Iranian army. Tens of thousands of marsh muslims, kurds, and christians. Think that qualifies?
How about Kim jung XXX. You know. The guy that's starving hundred of thousands of his countrymen?
How about China - you know - surpressing the daila llama. Mongolians. Tibetans. Forcing abortions on hundreds of thousands of women every year. You think they might qualify?
My! You really have gotten your knickers all in a twist haven't you? So much so that you forgot to blame me for international drug dealing ... an unforgiveable lapse on your part. Please don't make this mistake again.
All this muck raking simply because some others and I have had the temerity to shine a light on the Catholic Church's indefensible record on its sexual abuse crisis on another thread. A record that you have chosen to defend for reasons best known to yourself, but which must be unrelated to reality for the Church's record of criminal culpability in this area is indefensible.
quote:
Of course not. Because you're not really interested in peace. You're not really interested in stopping pedophilia. You're only interested in expanding the uma - the muslim world. And that's the reason for the Blair witch hunt.
Are you sure that you are not considering a career in stand up comedy? This is so pathetic it's laughable. The idea that I would promote any organised religion is hilarious. And in my low opinion of organised religion generally, Islam comes pretty close to the bottom of that list.
One again you lash out with a wild unsubstantiated charge to deflect attention from the poverty of your own position.
Most countries around the world simply want to be left to their own devices, their own way of doing things without outside interference. The Islamic nations are no different in this regard. For as long as foreign Western armies are invading and occupying their part of the world there will be war and violence. In this matter, we in the West are the aggressors the invaders the oppressers.
To insist that the West stops intervening and imposing its will and ways on non-Western nations and peoples is to advance the causes of peace, justice and human rights and to oppose militarism and aggression. To argue against this proposition is to support warmongering and aggression.
Each and every nation has the right to choose its own way and the right to be free from outside intervention denying them that right, You wouldn't accept foreigners invading the US and forcing an alien way of life upon Americans. Please accord to others the rights you insist on for yourself. It's as simple as that. 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' works on an international level just as much as it works on a personal level.
|
|
|
|
