RE: Domme / sub age difference

RE: Domme / sub age difference (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

MsNymph -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (5/27/2014 7:19:15 PM)
Age is not an issue for me in a M/s dynamic, because that's all it is. I have my lifetime relationship, which is completely separate from this. Older, younger, bring 'em on, I don't care as long as the right chemistry is there for our dynamic. MN

SweetlySadistic1 -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (5/27/2014 7:58:00 PM)
I prefer guys within ten or fifteen years of my own age in either direction. I just do. SweetlySadistic1

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/13/2014 4:17:10 PM)
ORIGINAL: FieryOpal I've noticed that virility sharply drops after mid-to-late 40's, Their porn-surfing habits intensify as their ability to get hard-ons diminishes. [sm=shame.gif] I may have to start going younger for good. Ten years older? Hell, no, I can't even consider 5 years older, if that. [:(]

FieryOpal -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/13/2014 7:37:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: FieryOpal I've noticed that virility sharply drops after mid-to-late 40's, Their porn-surfing habits intensify as their ability to get hard-ons diminishes. [sm=shame.gif] Could you elucidate, Is the finger-wagging for the naughty wankers and their porn addictions, or intended for me--for pointing this out? Or both? quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: FieryOpal I may have to start going younger for good. Ten years older? Hell, no, I can't even consider 5 years older, if that. [:(] There are always exceptional men. [:)]

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/15/2014 7:29:27 AM)
Could you elucidate, Is the finger-wagging for the naughty wankers and their porn addictions, or intended for me--for pointing this out? Or both? It is intended for you. For assuming the unsupported,unsubstantiated opinion that 'I've noticed that virility sharply drops after mid-to-late 40's, their ability to get hard-ons diminishes." This, however, is nothing short of a diving leap at a net ball with the save costing your body at least a dozen square inches of court rash. "There are always exceptional men."

FieryOpal -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/15/2014 8:28:52 AM)
[Brackets mine] quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx [FO:] Could you elucidate, Is the finger-wagging for the naughty wankers and their porn addictions, or intended for me--for pointing this out? Or both? It is intended for you. For assuming the unsupported,unsubstantiated opinion that [FO:] "I've noticed that virility sharply drops after mid-to-late 40's, their ability to get hard-ons diminishes." If you will note, I prefaced 'I've noticed' because this is a subjective observation I've made taking into consideration what many women have told me about their partners - morning wood notwithstanding - and includes slower recovery time. If you can locate a published clinical study that doesn't show a precipitous decline in male virility from the 30's onwards (in comparison to the late teens thru 20's), I'd be happy to take a look at it. [:)] Who's shelling out the dough for packets of Viagara? It's not women for their own selves, to increase their own sex drives. It would be an unsupported, unsubstantiated position to be in denial and become defensive just because your mileage may vary. quote: [tx:] This, however, is nothing short of a diving leap at a net ball with the save costing your body at least a dozen square inches of court rash. [FO: "There are always exceptional men."] How colorful. I was giving the benefit of the doubt based on common-sensical knowledge that to every rule there is an exception, unless you'd like to disabuse me of such speculation.

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/15/2014 8:54:06 AM)
quote: [tx:] This, however, is nothing short of a diving leap at a net ball with the save costing your body at least a dozen square inches of court rash. [FO: "There are always exceptional men."] How colorful. I was giving the benefit of the doubt based on common-sensical knowledge that to every rule there is an exception, unless you'd like to disabuse me of such speculation. Not at all. I thought it was a spectacular save,as was your reason for including it.

thishereboi -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/15/2014 9:03:12 AM)
For me the only time age matters is if I am going to be in an intimate relationship with them. If I am just playing with them at a party, I don't care as long as they are legal adults.

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/15/2014 9:09:57 AM)
If you will note, I prefaced 'I've noticed' because this is a subjective observation I've made taking into consideration what many women have told me about their partners - morning wood notwithstanding - and includes slower recovery time. If you can locate a published clinical study that doesn't show a precipitous decline in male virility from the 30's onwards (in comparison to the late teens thru 20's), I'd be happy to take a look at it. I would submit that if the subset of males over 40 who do not smoke or otherwise debilitate thier bodies were checked for virility vs 20 year olds the differences would smaller by several orders of magnitude. Granted I have only myself as a base line. My endocrinologist thinks it is funny to tell the women in his employ to keep their distance from me as my testosterone count is still over 780.

FieryOpal -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/15/2014 9:25:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx I would submit that if the subset of males over 40 who do not smoke or otherwise debilitate thier bodies were checked for virility vs 20 year olds the differences would smaller by several orders of magnitude. Granted I have only myself as a base line. My endocrinologist thinks it is funny to tell the women in his employ to keep their distance from me as my testosterone count is still over 780. And you had contended elsewhere that being 'exceptional' was a sucky compliment? [8\|]

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/15/2014 9:53:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FieryOpal quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx I would submit that if the subset of males over 40 who do not smoke or otherwise debilitate thier bodies were checked for virility vs 20 year olds the differences would smaller by several orders of magnitude. Granted I have only myself as a base line. My endocrinologist thinks it is funny to tell the women in his employ to keep their distance from me as my testosterone count is still over 780. And you had contended elsewhere that being 'exceptional' was a sucky compliment? [8\|] That "sucky" compliment was offered before you knew that particular aspect of my exceptionalism.[;)] In addition, there are other exceptional aspects of my personality

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/17/2014 1:53:53 PM)
ORIGINAL: thishereboi If I am just playing with them at a party, I don't care as long as they are legal adults. Would you do a toothless old hobo?

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/17/2014 6:32:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: johnnytheguy 1. What is the maximum acceptable age difference? How much younger he can be than you? How much older? It's what it should be. 2. Do you prefer younger or older sub? Yes. 3. Is it a bit different than in vanilla relationship where men tend to be older, or it's the same thing? Men tend to be older.

MissToYouRedux -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/17/2014 7:30:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie quote: ORIGINAL: johnnytheguy 1. What is the maximum acceptable age difference? How much younger he can be than you? How much older? It's what it should be. 2. Do you prefer younger or older sub? Yes. Quoted for truth, well, my truth anyway. [:)]

mistressneon -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/19/2014 7:52:48 AM)
I agree with the consensus for the most part-if he is 21,he's old enough. I'm 35 and I can take 'em ten years either way. For sessions, I seem to prefer them ten or more years older...they tend to be more generous, more articulate about what they want, etc.. While physically, I'm attracted to the way a young body looks. I'm more impressed by the way a more mature mind thinks. However, if the young blood with the hot bod happens to be an old soul, there you have the best of both worlds. But basically, age is just a number. I'd rather have a young acting older man that is fun than a younger man who is dull. --MISTRESS NEON,MOTO-Mistress Of The Obvious

FieryOpal -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/19/2014 9:31:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistressneon I'd rather have a young acting older man that is fun than a younger man who is dull. Same here. The problem with these youngbloods is that eventually they will want to settle down and start a family for the most part, and I'm past that stage, so not a likelihood of finding a life partner there. As well as the lack-of-maturity and generational gap issues with a much younger man, not to mention the creepy feeling factor of being with a man who is young enough to be my son. [:'(] If this is just for casual, no-commitment play, that's a different matter--but that's not for me, and I've sewn my wild oats a long time ago. On Blonderfluff's "Compromise" thread, I had said that I'd rather have two fabulous years with somebody who's right for me than ten mediocre ones with somebody who isn't the better overall choice, and I still stand by that statement.

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/19/2014 2:57:46 PM)
ORIGINAL: FieryOpal not to mention the creepy feeling factor of being with a man who is young enough to be my son. [:'(] Anyone has seen the eating scene from "tom jones a foundling" might disagree with your assessment of the squick factor. If this is just for casual, no-commitment play, that's a different matter--but that's not for me, and I've sewn my wild oats a long time ago. I believe that you are only as old as the women you feel. On Blonderfluff's "Compromise" thread, I had said that I'd rather have two fabulous years with somebody who's right for me than ten mediocre ones with somebody who isn't the better overall choice, and I still stand by that statement. Why is it either/or[:(]

FieryOpal -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/20/2014 4:33:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: FieryOpal <snip> On Blonderfluff's "Compromise" thread, I had said that I'd rather have two fabulous years with somebody who's right for me than ten mediocre ones with somebody who isn't the better overall choice, and I still stand by that statement. Why is it either/or[:(] It doesn't have to be mutually exclusive, you silly pamf. [:D]

thompsonx -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/20/2014 12:03:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FieryOpal quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: FieryOpal <snip> On Blonderfluff's "Compromise" thread, I had said that I'd rather have two fabulous years with somebody who's right for me than ten mediocre ones with somebody who isn't the better overall choice, and I still stand by that statement. Why is it either/or[:(] It doesn't have to be mutually exclusive, you silly pamf. [:D] Doesn't this I'd rather have Indicate mutual exclusivity?

FieryOpal -> RE: Domme / sub age difference (6/20/2014 12:58:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx Doesn't this I'd rather have Indicate mutual exclusivity? Well, if you're going to be a stickler, I was making a point, yanno, so then I had to reference back to that already-made point. Comprendez-vous? (Are not future modifications allowed? [:)] )

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875