right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun"

right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

OwnerFiftyNine -> right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/29/2014 6:35:25 PM)
"Famale CEO Stalked And Harassed After Developing Safer Gun" "Harassing and stalking women seems to be a thing with gun enthusiasts. Open Carry Texas does it and they justify it. Belinda Padilla, president and CEO of the U.S. division of firearm manufacturer Armatix, says she was stalked and threatened by “gun enthusiasts” after she tried to bring a safer handgun to market, according to the Raw Story. Padilla’s cellphone number was published and now she doesn’t even pick up her phone anymore if the caller is unknown. She received angry calls and heavy breathers. " [8\|] http://www.alan.com/2014/04/29/famale-ceo-stalked-and-harassed-after-developing-safer-gun/

SadistDave -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 1:24:32 AM)
What goes around comes around. When the libs in New York published the home addresses of gun owners back in January, they opened the door to this sort of nonsense. Now it's biting libs in the ass and all they do is cry. Boo fucking hoo... -SD-

DomKen -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 2:38:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave What goes around comes around. When the libs in New York published the home addresses of gun owners back in January, they opened the door to this sort of nonsense. Now it's biting libs in the ass and all they do is cry. Boo fucking hoo... -SD- Do you know this woman' politics? She is the CEO of a gun company. Not a position well known for attracting liberals. She is trying to bring a safer gun to market and that merits stalking and harassment? Since when?

SadistDave -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 3:38:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave What goes around comes around. When the libs in New York published the home addresses of gun owners back in January, they opened the door to this sort of nonsense. Now it's biting libs in the ass and all they do is cry. Boo fucking hoo... -SD- Do you know this woman' politics? She is the CEO of a gun company. Not a position well known for attracting liberals. She is trying to bring a safer gun to market and that merits stalking and harassment? Since when? Let's see, she's apparently a nanny-stater that thinks she can save everyone from those terrible gun owners if only there was a way to make them non-functional in the event that they are used in a way that's not approved by the manufacturer... I'd say her politics are pretty clear. And I'd say it merits stalking and harassment since January, when the liberals thought it was such a great idea to publish gun owners names so they could be stalked and harassed. The libs made it acceptable to publish the information of people with different political beliefs, so I'd say she deserves being harassed as much as you all thought gun owners deserved to be harassed earlier this year. Someone with different politics published her name and number. The people responded. There is no difference. -SD-

DesideriScuri -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 5:01:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave What goes around comes around. When the libs in New York published the home addresses of gun owners back in January, they opened the door to this sort of nonsense. Now it's biting libs in the ass and all they do is cry. Boo fucking hoo... -SD- The problem, is, though, it was wrong when the Lib's in NY did it, and it's wrong now. I think it's interesting that the gun can only be shot by the owner of the gun. While that might result in difficulties in teaching your kid how to shoot the gun, it certainly does help prevent someone from using a gun that was stolen. I have to wonder how that's done and if it can be used to allow others to be acceptable users. And, if it's sold, is there a way to remove the previous owner and add the new owner? Is this something that can be controlled remotely (if so, how do you prevent the government from "shutting off" everyone's smart guns?)?

thishereboi -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 5:15:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave What goes around comes around. When the libs in New York published the home addresses of gun owners back in January, they opened the door to this sort of nonsense. Now it's biting libs in the ass and all they do is cry. Boo fucking hoo... -SD- Do you know this woman' politics? She is the CEO of a gun company. Not a position well known for attracting liberals. She is trying to bring a safer gun to market and that merits stalking and harassment? Since when? Let's see, she's apparently a nanny-stater that thinks she can save everyone from those terrible gun owners if only there was a way to make them non-functional in the event that they are used in a way that's not approved by the manufacturer... I'd say her politics are pretty clear. And I'd say it merits stalking and harassment since January, when the liberals thought it was such a great idea to publish gun owners names so they could be stalked and harassed. The libs made it acceptable to publish the information of people with different political beliefs, so I'd say she deserves being harassed as much as you all thought gun owners deserved to be harassed earlier this year. Someone with different politics published her name and number. The people responded. There is no difference. -SD- The "they did it first" excuse is really getting old. Maybe next time you could come up with some new material. [8\|]

thishereboi -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 5:22:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave What goes around comes around. When the libs in New York published the home addresses of gun owners back in January, they opened the door to this sort of nonsense. Now it's biting libs in the ass and all they do is cry. Boo fucking hoo... -SD- The problem, is, though, it was wrong when the Lib's in NY did it, and it's wrong now. I think it's interesting that the gun can only be shot by the owner of the gun. While that might result in difficulties in teaching your kid how to shoot the gun, it certainly does help prevent someone from using a gun that was stolen. I have to wonder how that's done and if it can be used to allow others to be acceptable users. And, if it's sold, is there a way to remove the previous owner and add the new owner? Is this something that can be controlled remotely (if so, how do you prevent the government from "shutting off" everyone's smart guns?)? I think it would depend on how the gun senses that the owner is nearby. Does she have to be holding it in her hand or is it like the keyless cars and you just have to be near it at the time. It does sound like an interesting idea though.

thompsonx -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 5:59:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave Let's see, she's apparently Apparently means what???that you do not know the facts and this is your best guess? a nanny-stater that thinks she can save everyone from those terrible gun owners if only there was a way to make them non-functional in the event that they are used in a way that's not approved by the manufacturer... You did not notice she is the ceo of a free enterprise venture. What is it about free enterprise that offends you? Is anyone being required to purchase this product? I'd say her politics are pretty clear. Is there a political litmus test to see who is politically correct enough to sell guns? And I'd say it merits stalking and harassment You do realize that those are felonies that you are advocating. since January, when the liberals thought it was such a great idea to publish gun owners names so they could be stalked and harassed. Do you have any evidence that that was the purpose?

thompsonx -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 6:45:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri I think it's interesting that the gun can only be shot by the owner of the gun. That is not what it does. While that might result in difficulties in teaching your kid how to shoot the gun, it certainly does help prevent someone from using a gun that was stolen. Would it help or would it absolutely prevent unauthorized use? I have to wonder how that's done and if it can be used to allow others to be acceptable users. Google could be your friend here. And, if it's sold, is there a way to remove the previous owner and add the new owner? Think about the marketing problems that would pose if legal ownership could not be transfered? Is this something that can be controlled remotely That is how it is designed. (if so, how do you prevent the government from "shutting off" everyone's smart guns?)? Can the government shut off your smart phone? http://www.heavy.com/tech/2014/02/armatix-ip1-smart-gun/

lovmuffin -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 8:32:07 AM)
I have to wonder about the credibility of the link in the OP. I suspect the article is exaggerated. The smart gun concept came about because of the problem of cops getting shot with their own guns but most of them don't like the idea. Functional reliability is absolute priority for a defense weapon. No one wants this crap on their gun.

thishereboi -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 8:49:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin I have to wonder about the credibility of the link in the OP. I suspect the article is exaggerated. The smart gun concept came about because of the problem of cops getting shot with their own guns but most of them don't like the idea. Functional reliability is absolute priority for a defense weapon. No one wants this crap on their gun. I have to admit when I clicked on the link, I thought it said Lalaland instead of liberaland. Now my question is do they know they are missing an l.

cloudboy -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 8:57:54 AM)
THE NRA is categorically against smart weapons. Although National Rifle Association officials did not respond to requests for comment about smart-gun technology, the group fiercely opposes “government mandates that require the use of expensive, unreliable features, such as grips that would read your fingerprints before the gun will fire,” according to the Web site of its lobbying arm, the Institute for Legislative Action. “And NRA recognizes that the ‘smart guns’ issue clearly has the potential to mesh with the anti-gunner’s agenda, opening the door to a ban on all guns that do not possess the government-required technology.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/we-need-the-iphone-of-guns-will-smart-guns-transform-the-gun-industry/2014/02/17/6ebe76da-8f58-11e3-b227-12a45d109e03_story.html

thompsonx -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 8:59:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin I have to wonder about the credibility of the link in the OP. I suspect the article is exaggerated. The smart gun concept came about because of the problem of cops getting shot with their own guns but most of them don't like the idea. Functional reliability is absolute priority for a defense weapon. No one wants this crap on their gun. I went to the site and found the name of the company and searched it on google took about a minute. The weapons are made in germany and are activted by a rfid wristwatch worn by the user...a little under 2k. Made famous by being used in a james bond movie. All this is in the link I put up. Now if zimmy would have had one of them [;)]

lovmuffin -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 11:19:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin I have to wonder about the credibility of the link in the OP. I suspect the article is exaggerated. The smart gun concept came about because of the problem of cops getting shot with their own guns but most of them don't like the idea. Functional reliability is absolute priority for a defense weapon. No one wants this crap on their gun. I have to admit when I clicked on the link, I thought it said Lalaland instead of liberaland. Now my question is do they know they are missing an l. Probably not[8D]

lovmuffin -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 11:26:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cloudboy THE NRA is categorically against smart weapons You mean they're categorically against smart gun mandates. Good for them. I don't want that shit for any of my guns.

lovmuffin -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 11:30:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin I have to wonder about the credibility of the link in the OP. I suspect the article is exaggerated. The smart gun concept came about because of the problem of cops getting shot with their own guns but most of them don't like the idea. Functional reliability is absolute priority for a defense weapon. No one wants this crap on their gun. I went to the site and found the name of the company and searched it on google took about a minute. The weapons are made in germany and are activted by a rfid wristwatch worn by the user...a little under 2k. Made famous by being used in a james bond movie. All this is in the link I put up. Now if zimmy would have had one of them [;)] I think he needed a different kind of smart gun, one that would have made him smarter[8D]

OwnerFiftyNine -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 11:36:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin I have to wonder about the credibility of the link in the OP. I suspect the article is exaggerated. The smart gun concept came about because of the problem of cops getting shot with their own guns but most of them don't like the idea. Functional reliability is absolute priority for a defense weapon. No one wants this crap on their gun. I have to admit when I clicked on the link, I thought it said Lalaland instead of liberaland. Now my question is do they know they are missing an l. Of course the lunatic fringe denies anything that makes them look like terrorists.....That`s job one. So what else is new.....?

lovmuffin -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 11:52:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OwnerFiftyNine quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin I have to wonder about the credibility of the link in the OP. I suspect the article is exaggerated. The smart gun concept came about because of the problem of cops getting shot with their own guns but most of them don't like the idea. Functional reliability is absolute priority for a defense weapon. No one wants this crap on their gun. I have to admit when I clicked on the link, I thought it said Lalaland instead of liberaland. Now my question is do they know they are missing an l. Of course the lunatic fringe denies anything that makes them look like terrorists.....That`s job one. So what else is new.....? Looking at all your threads along with the hyperbole and vicious attacks on the right, what else is new ? If ya wanna talk about lunatic fringe, just look at some of the crap you link to and post including this thread too. Though it's good to know we can be put on moderation and then be allowed to come back with a new account.

OwnerFiftyNine -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 11:55:54 AM)
Accept I have examples......real ones..... [image]http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/0/6/5/0/0/9/7/Nugent-molester-Ted-Nugent-Nugent-Pedophile-73490142637.png[/image] It`s not over exaggeration..... it`s reading the news.......No wonder ya`ll need an alternate reality to escape to. Why don`t you whine to the UN Commission On Unfairness.....at the Needs A Clue Div.,Social Media Troll, section '7'. Tah tah....

stef -> RE: right-wing douche bags stalk CEO that developed a "safer gun" (4/30/2014 12:04:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OwnerFiftyNine So what else is new.....? From you? Doesn't look like much of anything is new, sadly.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875