New Guy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


tsatske -> New Guy (5/8/2014 2:27:43 PM)

So, I met a guy. Not on here, on OKCupid, in fact. I have been barely looking for a new man in my life. I'm awful happy with the life I lead single. But I met a guy anyway. I might have been barely looking, but I'm pretty open minded towards finding a nice guy. I've always said I could be with a vanilla, provided he was a Christian and willing to take charge of the relationship and household.

Well, he is a Christian, willing to go to church with me, pray with and over me, etc. He has never been in the lifestyle, beyond one previous lover who would let him hit her with a switch 3-4 times (as in 3-4 licks) before love making, and she just tolerated it, but didn't at all like it. Hell, he'd never had a blow job. He had a horrible sex free marriage that he stayed in till the end (He is a widow.) His wife was his first lover, and he was faithful, all subsequent lovers were after being widowed, so there's not a lot of experience, and no lifestyle experience.

He lives about 60 miles from me, and comes to see me a couple of weekends a month. We've been dating about 6 months.

He has had fantasies all his life, so he's more than willing to play. Well, sort of. He's willing to spank me, or spank me with light implements, but he's totally against leaving bruises, welts, drawing blood, or, for that matter, spank me on a Sat. night when I will be 'spending the next morning sitting on a hard pew.' He is willing to go to munches, just, with the distance between us, our schedules haven't lined up to go to one yet.

My problem really isn't with the level of play. He is just so NOT dominant. At play time he often demands that I tell him exactly what to do, what to do next, when, etc. Once he was so demanding that I decide rather he should have a blowjob first or spank me first that we got into a near-fight. Then I decided I was not being very submissive, all he wanted was enthusiastic consent, I decided, so I asked him to spank me. After this drawn out disagreement about setting the scene, which he essentially won, I asked him to spank me, turned over, and he asked 'with what first?'. I turned back over and said I was never going to get into the head space tonight, and I gave him a blow job and went to sleep.

The truth is, the play is not too light. I have been a major maso in past relationships, but it's been about 5 years since I was in such a relationship. But I've never been good at bottoming. I can't get in the right headspace to enjoy pain without feeling dominated. So I almost never reach that headspace with him, so the light play we do is often hard for me to handle, pain wise. The one or two times that I have reached a good headspace and really got off on the pain, he really liked that. He talks about it, and about wanting to re-achieve that. But if I have to keep telling him, each time we play, to spank me for 15 minutes and then switch to his belt.... that headspace is not going to happen. because I don't care much if he spanks me for 15 minutes or starts with his belt, or anything else, as long as I don't have to be in control.

sex is not really the issue. Play is just sex and it's meant to bolster the relationship, not be the center of it. The problem is his absolute refusal to make the simplest decision. Where to go eat. Rather to go eat. Which road to take to get there. I make all social arrangements. Last time he was here, it was for Easter, and we went out on Saturday to drive to the church where I go to sunrise service, because it's different than my normal church, and usually I ride with someone else in the past, and I wanted us to be able to find it at 6:a. I suggested we stop at a local outdoor stand restaurant for dinner. He knows I was looking forward to that place opening for spring and was happy to go there with me. In fact, he's always happy to do anything I suggest. On the way home, I said, 'You can avoid the highway by taking the route we took yesterday, which is coming up on your right, or the highway is a block past that.' He refused to make a decision. He asked what I wanted to do. Then he does what he generally does when I refuse to make a decision for him - he got me to repeat the options, and did the first one I listed. He does this often enough that it is very noticeable.

On the other hand, he does not take hints well, though he expects me to. He has to be told things very directly, even things that I am only suggesting because he has hinted that he would like to do them. He has told me several times how much he wold enjoy bringing me flowers and asked me on several different occasions if I would like, or be okay with him doing that. On a recent trip to the grocery, I pointed out in the floral department that they currently had flowers on clearance. I said, 'If you want to buy me flowers, get them when they are on clearance.' I didn't get flowers. I can tell you assuredly, though, that if I had said 'Please buy me flowers' He would have been delighted. Though I'm sure he would have made me select them.

I've talked to him about rituals that I find meaningful, enjoyable, or nice. Generally he is okay with them. I do them. He doesn't seem to notice. I also go out of my way to do things that he does mention. When I talk about things I do for him as a 'service', he is uncomfortable with the language, as he is with the words 'Master' and 'slave'. well, that's fine, I know other people who are uncomfortable with those 2 words.

He is very firm that he wants an egalitarian relationship. My problems in this relationship are two fold. I don't feel like I'm in an egalitarian relationship - I feel like I'm in charge. And, 2, I don't want an egalitarian relationship, I want to relinquish control. Is this going to get better when we can start going to munches and parties and he meets nice people who are into the things he fantasizes about? because he has ideas about the kind of people who do this, and they aren't nice ideas. He seems to be very impressed with himself for not being an asshole - he says, 'If I didn't care about you, I wouldn't care what you thought or listen to you or care if you enjoyed it', etc, and I reply that in that case I wouldn't be with him.




SailingBum -> RE: New Guy (5/8/2014 2:51:53 PM)

I really don't see the issue... plain and simple his is not the one. As he won't take charge.

BadOne




Chwilfrydig -> RE: New Guy (5/8/2014 2:54:47 PM)

"The problem is his absolute refusal to make the simplest decision."

At his age, it is doubtful that he will "learn" to be decisive. Disregarding everything else, this one character trait will frustrate you more and more as time goes on.

You might want to consider searching for a more compatible partner. Tough decision, but you both might be happier in the long run.

Cheers and good luck.




FieryOpal -> RE: New Guy (5/10/2014 11:20:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske

My problem really isn't with the level of play. He is just so NOT dominant. At play time he often demands that I tell him exactly what to do, what to do next, when, etc.
<snip>

If he were a Dominant, his decisiveness would have been apparent in less than the six months you've been dating. I may ask a lot of questions with a new partner, for the sake of fine-tuning my information-gathering process, but I have a clear vision of what I want, what would be best for our relationship, and in which direction it will be heading. It doesn't sound to me like his vision of your "egalitarian" relationship is aligned with your vision of a D/s relationship dynamic.

I have been a church-goer in the past long enough to know that most Christian men lean towards overly emphasizing their duty to act as head of household. Your man is not Dominant and will never be. You are helping him, but he is the kind of man who relies upon a woman to prop him up, and it doesn't sound as if that will ever fulfill your needs.

Sorry he's not The One. But neither are you the right match for him, and you're both just biding your time and letting your carnal desires rule you. It wouldn't be fair for either one of you to become overly attached to the other by default and end up with a co-dependent situation on your hands. Under the circumstances, you both need a breather and a cooling off period. I don't believe there is anything you can tell him in a heart-to-heart conversation that wouldn't make him feel inadequate and rejected, so please do pray about how to broach the subject of a time-out. Best of luck as you continue your search for a more suitable partner with whom to share your life, hopes and dreams.




Greta75 -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 1:28:51 AM)

FR

This is interesting because he sounds like a really good guy who cares about your thoughts and feelings alot. The funny thing is, I would really like this guy of yours as I like making decisions like where to eat, and which route to take. And if he needs instruction on how the whole scening should go, and if he wants me to plan it, I can totally do it from head to toe for him, a full step by step instruction and he can do it.

Of course it wasn't like this with my x-dom, he wanted to micro managed to the extent of wanting to tell me what I can or cannot eat when we go out and eat, he does not ask my opinion for anything and wants to make decisions for everything, and just place orders for me and expect me to eat what he orders. And it's often not anything I like at all. I was not happy with that. But it worked for a while because we were sexually or kink compatible. I never had to tell him what to do, he just knows exactly how to bring me to subspace every time.

But I was just thinking about with someone like this dude of yours, if his good at following instructions to the Tee, he could be molded to suit me very well.





FightingChains -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 3:30:05 AM)

It seems to me that he's a submissive sadist. He likes hurting, but he can't make the decisions. I've encountered this with my partner. I needed him to take control, and I made that clear. He just lacked confidence, and suffered from an anxiety disorder, and while he is generally submissive, I've allowed him to take control in other ways and it helped him, and me. We gel together.

You need to work out if there are ways you gel, or if there aren't, and be honest about it. While I've found this to be workable (I'm a somewhat dominant guy, and a sadomasochist tending towards masochist) there are some it wouldn't work for. You need to be honest with yourself and him, work out if he's the right guy for you.




OriginalRebel -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 5:11:38 AM)

I asked him to spank me, turned over, and he asked 'with what first?'

But if I have to keep telling him, each time we play, to spank me for 15 minutes and then switch to his belt...

The problem is his absolute refusal to make the simplest decision.

he got me to repeat the options, and did the first one I listed. He does this often enough that it is very noticeable.


On the other hand, he does not take hints well, though he expects me to.

On a recent trip to the grocery, I pointed out in the floral department that they currently had flowers on clearance. I said, 'If you want to buy me flowers, get them when they are on clearance.' I didn't get flowers. I can tell you assuredly, though, that if I had said 'Please buy me flowers' He would have been delighted.

he is uncomfortable with the language.



I may be wrong but so much of what you wrote screamed 'Asperger Syndrome'. He may well be on the Aspergic spectrum. There are many levels of this but it may be worth researching it because you may well find yourself reading about him.




FightingChains -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 6:02:50 AM)

Hmmm it's possible. I have Aspergers and I'm quite comfortable being extremely dominant. Then again, I'm hardly affected and am socially quite well-adjusted for an 'Aspie'.

It is a good pickup, though. Not understanding social cues (hints) is a big element of Aspergers. I often get annoyed my partner doesn't pick up on things in my life, and I have to admit I'm guilty that I am not always the best at picking up things in his.

I don't understand the decisions thing as an Aspie issue... maybe indecisive as he's not sure what would be appropriate? That more screams submissive and "service top" to me, though.




OriginalRebel -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 6:17:32 AM)

I know three very good dominant men that are Aspies and I certainly didn't want to suggest that an Aspie couldn't make a good dominant because they certainly can. I also have an Aspie partner and an Aspie son and so I'm pretty clued up.

The thing that jumped out at me the most was, "On a recent trip to the grocery, I pointed out in the floral department that they currently had flowers on clearance. I said, 'If you want to buy me flowers, get them when they are on clearance.' I didn't get flowers. I can tell you assuredly, though, that if I had said 'Please buy me flowers' He would have been delighted." because I know how Aspies so often just don't get clues, hints and suggestions.




Greta75 -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 6:24:06 AM)

quote:

because I know how Aspies so often just don't get clues, hints and suggestions.

Nothing to do with Aspies. I thought that was a man's thing. You got to be blatant with them.




FightingChains -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 6:28:45 AM)

Aspies do have significantly harder times understanding that type of thing, though, Greta. Seriously, we cannot tell a lot of social cues, from what's inappropriate to talk about, to what people are hinting about in any situation. Social interaction can get extremely difficult for aspies, especially young ones who haven't found ways to understand and gain context.




OriginalRebel -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 6:33:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

because I know how Aspies so often just don't get clues, hints and suggestions.

Nothing to do with Aspies. I thought that was a man's thing. You got to be blatant with them.



Are you saying this isn't an Aspie trait?

Anyway, I'm not going to drone on about this except to say, there is nothing wrong with having 'Aspergers' but people are often mistaken for being a bit strange when there is actually very good reason for certain behaviour.




Greta75 -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 6:46:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OriginalRebel
Are you saying this isn't an Aspie trait?

I am saying that so far, from the description of what's going on, is quite common with men in general in my experience.
I always find that I have to be very blatant and really make things idiot proof, and forget the fantasy about expecting them to get my hints or read my mind. Of course the ones who are very sensitive and intuitive are usually already taken, as they will naturally be women magnets.

I would expect aspies to suffer from a greater degree of not getting things.




angelikaJ -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 8:31:49 AM)

Do you think that having concrete information might help?
Perhaps you could read Screw the Roses, Send Me the Thorns together or he could read The New Topping Book?
Maybe The Loving Dominant could be something he would read?

If he has fantasies then I think there could be potential, there but it sounds like he needs to develop self-confidence as a dominant partner.
If he had information on safety and other things, then he might not need so much direction.

And if you want him to be dominant, then why are you telling him which flowers to buy?
It sounds like there are a few mixed signals on your end.






freedomdwarf1 -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 9:01:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OriginalRebel


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

because I know how Aspies so often just don't get clues, hints and suggestions.

Nothing to do with Aspies. I thought that was a man's thing. You got to be blatant with them.



Are you saying this isn't an Aspie trait?

Anyway, I'm not going to drone on about this except to say, there is nothing wrong with having 'Aspergers' but people are often mistaken for being a bit strange when there is actually very good reason for certain behaviour.

I think too many people jump on the aspie's bandwagon as a convenient excuse for someone who just isn't... ummm, how can I put this? just not having the experience and sometimes not even the smarts to pick up normal social cues. Sometimes it's just a habitual laziness in not bothering to think and expecting everyone else to give them all the answers on a silver platter.
I'm not decrying Aspergers because for those that are genuine sufferers, it's an awful condition to have. But I do think it is frequently, and wrongly, given as a diagnosis because it just happens to fit the symptoms nicely.


Back to tsatske's problem: in a nut-shell, this isn't the right man for you. Simple as that.




FightingChains -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 11:44:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I think too many people jump on the aspie's bandwagon as a convenient excuse for someone who just isn't... ummm, how can I put this? just not having the experience and sometimes not even the smarts to pick up normal social cues. Sometimes it's just a habitual laziness in not bothering to think and expecting everyone else to give them all the answers on a silver platter.
I'm not decrying Aspergers because for those that are genuine sufferers, it's an awful condition to have. But I do think it is frequently, and wrongly, given as a diagnosis because it just happens to fit the symptoms nicely.


Back to tsatske's problem: in a nut-shell, this isn't the right man for you. Simple as that.



That the diagnosis is generally made about children based on the observation of adults of behaviour. The warning signs of Aspergers are odd behaviours that are highly unlikely to be another thing. These include extreme focus on certain random topics, extreme lack of hand eye coordination, behavioural idiosyncrasies, lack of social context awareness, lack of ability to decipher facial moods. It is extremely unlikely that they will throw out a major diagnoses as this without intense study and certainty.

I was diagnosed as an Aspie at 15 by a group of 10 doctors/psychologists in the field. I had all the above signs, especially fixations on topics and lack of hand eye coordination. My fixations went for years and were intense. These symptoms are highly unlikely to show in a normal person, and be observed as 'Aspergers' with a misdiagnosis. You can't 'fake' and 'overlook' childhood fixations. I know more about Titanic than any person I know, despite the fact the topic bores me to death now, because when I was 7-10 I was extremely fixated on the topic, just before the movie came out. These types of weird behaviours are Aspergers traits, and they'll look for them. It's pretty hard to misdiagnose Aspergers in these cases.

I think you're just pushing lack of knowledge and your desire to talk down psychological diagnoses into a post. "They diagnose ADHD too easily." "In my day they didn't diagnose people as this." "I don't understand the subject matter but I think people are making excuses, so I'll criticise it."




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 11:56:35 AM)

I don't disagree with your own diagnosis.
You were lucky to have that many professionals and they all agreed on your condition.
In the same post I also said that for those that are genuine sufferers it is an awful condition.

However, I've seen far too many instances where (usually adults or older kids) actually play the system - either with Aspergers and/or AD/HD. I know because I have 3 bastard boys as neighbours and their mother has already admitted that she gets them to play up at the GP's assessment so she can continue to claim disability payments for them.
Not everybody gets such a thorough testing before diagnosis.





OriginalRebel -> RE: New Guy (5/11/2014 12:48:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
In the same post I also said that for those that are genuine sufferers it is an awful condition.


I think there are some real advantages of being Aspergic. Attention to detail, fantastic problem solvers, being able to speak their mind without fear, exceptional memory and an increased probability of attending university, are but a few. Many of the best inventors in the world are Aspies.








tsatske -> RE: New Guy (5/12/2014 12:51:18 PM)

freedom dwarf, that is an awful thing for that mother to do. No one should encourage their kids to ever be less than the most they can be. I have 2 Aspie boys, and they are both college grads and doing great. They are high-functioning, but they are still shining examples of what can be done, IMHO.

I hadn't thought about Aspburgers, even with my 2 Aspie sons. I had decided he was dyslexic because menues confuse him, (and he doesn't much care for reading). He told me when we started dating that I'd have to learn what he liked and order for him in a restaurant, but that hasn't been the case. I reframe the menu into questions, ('Do you feel like beef, chicken or fish?, and then, given my growing knowledge of his prefrences, I offer him the options that are avialable on the menu that fit, and he choses what he wants. so that is one place where he is willing to make a descion, I guess.

Thank all of you for your helpful answers, it is giving me a lot to think about.




BecomingV -> RE: New Guy (5/12/2014 7:48:40 PM)

It sounds like a bad fit.

I could go either way with this.

1 - He is the kind of dominant whom likes to delegate and whom does so kindly. "You choose." That's an order, to a submissive, to please him in that way. You are reacting to his instruction as a bottom whom expects him to be your service top.

2 - He's not dominant, not sadistic and not open to either. He's just kinky. You are a submissive whom seeks a Dominant, and that's not him.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875