njlauren -> RE: The reason the life style needs to be keep hidden is what (5/11/2014 8:19:10 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP It depends how you define lifestyle. If you're pushing your sexuality into other people's faces, then that's sexual harassment and causing a hostile work environment. And if it isn't germane to your job, then it's inappropriate and you deserve to get fired by causing problems in the workspace. If you define lifestyle as telling your friends that you have to check with your spouse to see if it's okay for you to go out with them, then that's being a good spouse, making sure that what you do won't cause unintended problems for them. When people have hassled me about needing to check in with him I don't state that I'm his slave. I just ask them how they can define being selfish as being loving. My gay friends come to dinner hand in hand but they don't go around having sex on the dinner table. My straight friends, the same. Yet I have heard the same argument from gay haters (and I am not saying you are one), that why do gays have to 'flaunt' their relationships, why do 'they' have to make their sexual preferences a 'public' spectacle, how 'straight' people don't 'flaunt' their sexuality, so there are nuances there. Straight people do flaunt their sexuality, their lifestyle, women make a big display of wedding rings, people talk about their wives and families, they talk about what they do, and sex talk is not exactly unknown among people at work, group of women from work go out and they bitch and moan about their lack of sex, etc, men talk about it among themselves.....so it depends on what you mean about 'flaunting it'. Talking in detail about sex lives at the office is a no no, in the sense of telling everyone your intimate details, especially if the other person said they are uncomfortable. A gay person talking about their partner is not flaunting it, a gay person talking about what they did saturday night in the bedroom is, same thing with a straight woman or man. But for example, if a oerson mentions that he and his wife are dominants and they have a live in sub, is that harassment? Any more than a married couple talking about having kids? Married couples talk about going to 'couples' resorts like Hedonism (or whatever exists these days), if a BD/SM couple went to a leather convention and mentioned it casually, without the details, would that be harassment? If my wife is my domme, and instead of my wife I call her my domme, should that be harassment? The crux of the matter is that with BD/SM, it is seen much as being gay was for many years, which is something taboo, deviant, not normal, to the point that simply talking about the nature of the relationship is 'dirty', is 'forcing their lifestyle' on others, when straights doing the same thing are simply 'talking about their family/relationship'. If I said "myself and my wife are going to a resort' no one would bat an eye, if I said "my domme and I are going to a resort", they would probably freak out.... The reason it is still private is because of bad associations, and to a certain extent the LGBT world is a parallel to it. Look at the anti gay attitudes still out there, especially among religious conservatives, and what do you see? Portrayals of serial promiscuity, diseases, lack of solid moral fiber (whatever the hell that is), how 'they" want to 'bring us all down' and so forth.....then think of BD/SM, and what is the common image? Weirdos, with a man hating bitch tearing the flesh off of some wimp of a man, some guy tying up a girl and raping her, people who adore giving others pain any way they can, you name it....even among people who are pretty liberal, and even among those who champion 'sexual freedom' the image isn't very good, and these you would figure would be allies. There are plenty of so called feminists (and I say so called to differentiate them from the real deal) who see S/M as abuse, as men 'recreating the patriarchy' and call S/M 'license to rape' and worse (forgetting of course that many such couplings are fem dom/sub male); there are a lot of people in the LGBT world who still are uncomfortable with it, was involved with a charity event to raise funds to prevent child abuse where there was serious debate (when there should have been none IMO) about lesbian and gay male leather groups being co-sponsors....... One of the prime reasons it needs to be kept secret is that as a society we still haven't come to grips with sex, besides the religious moronic types who still hype that sex is between a man and a woman to make babies and create all these bizarre rules about anything that is sex for emotional or other reasons, it also is an area where it is still okay to be prejudiced and bigoted and no one will shut you up. Comedian makes a joke about gays or lesbians that is derogatory they will get called on the carpet, make a joke about S/M it will get laughs. On TV shows, S/M is generally associated with deviance and often with crimes (the first episode of CSI had an S/M theme, though Grissom, one of my favorite characters ever on TV and a fictional character I would absolutely love to know (not to mention go to bed with!) is really cool about it), it is now one of the few areas you can use to control other people. Being into S/M can and is used for grounds of gaining custody of kids in a divorce, in all 50 states you can be fired from your job if your boss finds out and doesn't like it, it can keep you from getting a job. Even in liberal NYC, there was a big outcry not long ago (not surprisingly, led by the NY Post, another organ of the so called "libertarian' GOP), where an attorney for the state or city (can't remember which) was outed that she was a dominant, who may or may not have been doing it professionally , which is legal in NY State, and I believe she was forced to resign. And why was it a big deal in the first place? I am one of the first people to say that I don't like sex thrown in people's faces, I don't like over the top PDA's by any kind of couple, and I don't like it when D/s couples have a thing about doing it publicly (like having a slave wear a collar and leash in non S/M settings, or things like having the slave sit on the floor at a public restaurant and so forth) that some like to do, to me it is non consensual, but I also don't think someone should be fired or have their kids taken away because they went to a leather convention, either.
|
|
|
|