Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
The NYT is not the leftist shill you like to portray -- that's just the lens through which you view it. There's no question Obama is merely Bush-Lite, and the (agreed) weak "at least he didn't invade Iraq" is, sadly, an improvement -- from a disaster to status quo. At least he's not listening to critics and rushing into these conflicts with military might blazing. Those approaches have consequences (as Bush tried to pretend wasn't true). But the claim that he has no vision here, no solutions, no signs of forward motion -- it's true. On the other hand, the world isn't as simple as US vs. USSR anymore (not that it was then, but we could pretend), and just what would satisfactorily resolve this list of troubles, I can't imagine. No one else has ideas either, short of "Attack!" I don't see where the Times softened it at all -- they added (and you omitted) that while that 2.5 years still holds a window, Douthat doesn't hold any hope. There's the added point that I don't see where a columnist speaks for the Times as a whole -- columnists regularly disagree. It's Douthat's opinion. Granted, he has a point, even though he's largely stating the obvious, bringing nothing to the table. Apparently, his column was due, and he had nothing else.
|