Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in perspective


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in perspective Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 9:05:50 AM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
I've linked to Skeptical Science many times, not like it's gonna change skeptics' minds at all, but at least it is there if deniers ever change their minds about being narrow minded

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 9:54:21 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
For most people (including me) the details of the science goes over heads, or becomes so mind numbingly intricate that people switch off confused.

The one question that everyone can understand and that the sceptics are unable to answer convincingly is why so many respectable climate change scientists are insisting on AGW, putting their reputations and careers on the line, if it is a false idea. The sceptics have two answers to this question;
1. to get research grants; and
2. it's a massive conspiracy to re-distribute wealth (or creeping socialism).

One needs no more than a double digit IQ to recognise that these reasons are totally incredible. Until the deniers come up with a more plausible reason why thousands and thousands of scientists internationally should join a secret conspiracy to re distribute wealth or why they would jeopardise their careers and reputations by engaging in fiction in order to get research grants, the sceptics' claims ought to be treated with derision.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 5/20/2014 9:55:41 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 4:25:54 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

For most people (including me) the details of the science goes over heads, or becomes so mind numbingly intricate that people switch off confused.

The one question that everyone can understand and that the sceptics are unable to answer convincingly is why so many respectable climate change scientists are insisting on AGW, putting their reputations and careers on the line, if it is a false idea. The sceptics have two answers to this question;
1. to get research grants; and
2. it's a massive conspiracy to re-distribute wealth (or creeping socialism).

One needs no more than a double digit IQ to recognise that these reasons are totally incredible. Until the deniers come up with a more plausible reason why thousands and thousands of scientists internationally should join a secret conspiracy to re distribute wealth or why they would jeopardise their careers and reputations by engaging in fiction in order to get research grants, the sceptics' claims ought to be treated with derision.


Or one can answer like Judith Curry does.

A great deal of research is conducted - such as oceanic currents. Historical temperature distributions, atmospheric energy flux. Knowledge in these very distinct specialities predisposes one to believe in IPCC while not actually have any significant expertise the IPCC theory.

Likewise, publishing papers that support one or more aspects of IPCC does not in turn translate into support of the IPCC model in the least.

For example, Orestes listed as supporting AGW the author whose paper found that 40-70% of global warming was caused by insolation - not co2. When asked if he supported AGW - he replied not in the least. 470 authors were found to have claimed to have supported IPCC who did not in fact. Out of Orestes thousand odd papers....

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 4:37:09 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

First I suggest you look at this report.


Jlf, I'm well acquainted with skeptical science. This is a site whose admitted purpose is to "silence" climate deniers. Who organized hit squads of people to harass people - even published authors that disagreed with the party line (for example bergstroff).

Skeptical Science's information is based on the cook report - which was severely flawed methodologically and which I alread debunked in my previous post.

By the way - did you ever wonder why they chose the terms 'global climate change' and 'global warming? Its because they had to cover orestes who had lied about using the term "global warming".

Orestes presented her research and said: I searched on the term "global warming" and found x papers. 97% of them support AGW.

So when these facts were checked by another researcher - these statistics were found to be straight up fabricated.
Searching on "global warming" resulted in 3X papers.

Searching on "global climate change" resulted in Y papers.

The fact is that is she fabricated such a crucial element as the number of data points - how can you have any credence that she didn't fabricate the numbers supporting or denying?

And in fact Peiser found she fabricated that as well.

The myth of 97% consensus is just that. A myth.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 4:46:36 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cjuGCJJUGsg

This sums up the situation shortly and sweetly.



Once again the big lie. "97%" when the actual number is 37%.

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.


We all know this one....statistics don't lie, statisticians however, do.

I think it's clear, man is creating problems on the planet, and it's even clearer with bee's and other issues, we're contributing to events that will affect our future.

Is it sunspots in clearly defined cycles? Fair question.

Is it Malthus finally being proven correct? Equally fair.

Here's the deal: Cyclical sun spots, magnetic cores shifting, niconitides, aliens, far too many rap videos....it's really immaterial....we can do better.

That's how simple it gets.

If EVERYONE portraying man's input is wrong (or right), we are now singularly in all of history, more than any other life form on this planet's history, capable of doing so much better.

Even if we never caused one iota of these events which are becoming clearer by the hour, regardless of their genesis.....we can do better.

It no longer matters who's correct.

We can do better.

That's how simple it gets.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 4:49:57 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cjuGCJJUGsg

This sums up the situation shortly and sweetly.



Once again the big lie. "97%" when the actual number is 37%.

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.


We all know this one....statistics don't lie, statisticians however, do.

I think it's clear, man is creating problems on the planet, and it's even clearer with bee's and other issues, we're contributing to events that will affect our future.

Is it sunspots in clearly defined cycles? Fair question.

Is it Malthus finally being proven correct? Equally fair.

Here's the deal: Cyclical sun spots, magnetic cores shifting, niconitides, aliens, far too many rap videos....it's really immaterial....we can do better.

That's how simple it gets.

If EVERYONE portraying man's input is wrong (or right), we are now singularly in all of history, more than any other life form on this planet's history, capable of doing so much better.

Even if we never caused one iota of these events which are becoming clearer by the hour, regardless of their genesis.....we can do better.

It no longer matters who's correct.

We can do better.

That's how simple it gets.


Nookie - you're missing the point.

In what direction lies *better*.

Eco terrorists would have you believe that renewable energy that results in energy poverty for the west and accomplishes nothing save poverty and the export of millions of jobs is the way to go.. that way lies disaster.

Which is why spain, and german are backing away from their commitment. Its why germanies reliance on coal power has INCREASED over the last 5 years.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 5:21:22 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Hmm, scientists who support climate change theory are primarily found in government service, universities and independent labs.

Scientists who are climate change deniers are usually in the employ of fossil fuel suppliers, funded by people like the Koch brothers and are making big bucks to deny climate change.

Sorry, but I am gonna believe the guys who are not making a 7 digit salary.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 6:12:46 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cjuGCJJUGsg

This sums up the situation shortly and sweetly.



Once again the big lie. "97%" when the actual number is 37%.

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.


We all know this one....statistics don't lie, statisticians however, do.

I think it's clear, man is creating problems on the planet, and it's even clearer with bee's and other issues, we're contributing to events that will affect our future.

Is it sunspots in clearly defined cycles? Fair question.

Is it Malthus finally being proven correct? Equally fair.

Here's the deal: Cyclical sun spots, magnetic cores shifting, niconitides, aliens, far too many rap videos....it's really immaterial....we can do better.

That's how simple it gets.

If EVERYONE portraying man's input is wrong (or right), we are now singularly in all of history, more than any other life form on this planet's history, capable of doing so much better.

Even if we never caused one iota of these events which are becoming clearer by the hour, regardless of their genesis.....we can do better.

It no longer matters who's correct.

We can do better.

That's how simple it gets.


Nookie - you're missing the point.

In what direction lies *better*.

Eco terrorists would have you believe that renewable energy that results in energy poverty for the west and accomplishes nothing save poverty and the export of millions of jobs is the way to go.. that way lies disaster.

Which is why spain, and german are backing away from their commitment. Its why germanies reliance on coal power has INCREASED over the last 5 years.



Windmills kill birds, nuclear needs a home for hot water for a katrillion years, solar requires sources of diminishing silicon, oil through fracking (MASSIVE amounts of water required when farm acreage goes fallow), or corn/sawgrass/ etc. which they now say costs 200% more in energy to create than it produces in heat or other power/energy.

I ain't smart enough to figure out all this shit.

I just know one thing: We can do better.

Cars got 10 mpg when I was a kid. Today they get 30 (which according to GM and others wasn't possible 10 years ago....now that we're aiming for 55 mpg by 2025, that's also impossible, yet WalMart working with PacCar just created a genius semi truck that gets 16 mpg (average today for an OTR rig....5 - 6 mpg).

Before I die, WalMart will be driving big rigs getting 32 mpg and standard road vehicles will be getting 185 mpg and....in safer rigs than today....yeah, they'll cost 130 grand but, they'll also last 40 years.

We can do better.

< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 5/20/2014 6:20:07 PM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 6:14:18 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Hmm, scientists who support climate change theory are primarily found in government service, universities and independent labs.

Scientists who are climate change deniers are usually in the employ of fossil fuel suppliers, funded by people like the Koch brothers and are making big bucks to deny climate change.

Sorry, but I am gonna believe the guys who are not making a 7 digit salary.


I don't have an opinion on who (or what) is causing it, but that it's happening is undeniable.

Regardless.......it doesn't even matter if anyone disagrees with that entire precept.....

We, of all, and every generation that ever preceded us.....can do better.

< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 5/20/2014 6:16:10 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 6:31:34 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Hmm, scientists who support climate change theory are primarily found in government service, universities and independent labs.

Scientists who are climate change deniers are usually in the employ of fossil fuel suppliers, funded by people like the Koch brothers and are making big bucks to deny climate change.

Sorry, but I am gonna believe the guys who are not making a 7 digit salary.


Agit prop.

Any evidence?

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in p... - 5/20/2014 6:46:34 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Eco terrorists would have you believe that renewable energy that results in energy poverty for the west and accomplishes nothing save poverty and the export of millions of jobs is the way to go.. that way lies disaster.


"Eco terrorists". Far out.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 31
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: John Oliver puts climate change deniers (fido) in perspective Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078