RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"?

RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

lovmuffin -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 7:58:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick Just out of curiosity I asked one of the Other Fellas buddies, who is a police marksman, about hitting a running person in a specific toe from 25 yards, and he just laughed. We're all laughing too [sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif]

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 8:06:14 AM)
ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick Just out of curiosity I asked one of the Other Fellas buddies, who is a police marksman, about hitting a running person in a specific toe from 25 yards, and he just laughed. We're all laughing too That's what chairborn rangers do.

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 8:08:20 AM)
ORIGINAL: lovmuffin We're all laughing too That takes a whole lot less balls than showing up at building 12 with your toes and money

lovmuffin -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 8:20:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: lovmuffin We're all laughing too That takes a whole lot less balls than showing up at building 12 with your toes and money [sm=abducted.gif]

BamaD -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 8:34:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx Can't really id them, but I think they are all bigger than a .22, so who has the little girls gun? We all know (because you have told us) that you do not have a slab side...which is not a little girls gun. I haven't told what I own, I have said I don't own firearms with 20 to 50 rounds, not even 14, but you are making things up again. Perhaps you might get a grown up to read what I said and explain it to you. I said you told us what you did not own. I have never listed what I don't own. By the same token I have not said exactly what I do own, I understood what you were saying and responded with how close I had come to what you said. You are assuming from incomplete information, and as usual you are assuming wrong.

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 8:40:45 AM)
ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ORIGINAL: thompsonx We're all laughing too That takes a whole lot less balls than showing up at building 12 with your toes and money [sm=abducted.gif] More chin music

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 8:43:11 AM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx Can't really id them, but I think they are all bigger than a .22, so who has the little girls gun? We all know (because you have told us) that you do not have a slab side...which is not a little girls gun. I haven't told what I own, I have said I don't own firearms with 20 to 50 rounds, not even 14, but you are making things up again. Perhaps you might get a grown up to read what I said and explain it to you. I said you told us what you did not own. I have never listed what I don't own. By the same token I have not said exactly what I do own, I understood what you were saying and responded with how close I had come to what you said. You are assuming from incomplete information, and as usual you are assuming wrong. I am pretty sure you have stated that you would like a 1911 because you did not have one.

BamaD -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:07:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx Can't really id them, but I think they are all bigger than a .22, so who has the little girls gun? We all know (because you have told us) that you do not have a slab side...which is not a little girls gun. I haven't told what I own, I have said I don't own firearms with 20 to 50 rounds, not even 14, but you are making things up again. Perhaps you might get a grown up to read what I said and explain it to you. I said you told us what you did not own. I have never listed what I don't own. By the same token I have not said exactly what I do own, I understood what you were saying and responded with how close I had come to what you said. You are assuming from incomplete information, and as usual you are assuming wrong. I am pretty sure you have stated that you would like a 1911 because you did not have one. And you expand that to mean I don't own an automatic? I also told KD that SOMETIMES I carry a revolver. And I have stated that I always carry. Therefore the rest of the time I must carry something else, do you think that would be a 19th century dueling pistol? What does that do to your claim? And what difference does it make?

Real0ne -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:17:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx I haven't told what I own, I have said I don't own firearms with 20 to 50 rounds, not even 14, but you are making things up again. Perhaps you might get a grown up to read what I said and explain it to you. I said you told us what you did not own. And you expand that to mean I don't own an automatic? I also told KD that SOMETIMES I carry a revolver. And I have stated that I always carry. Therefore the rest of the time I must carry something else, do you think that would be a 19th century dueling pistol? What does that do to your claim? And what difference does it make? People sometimes wonder why I have felch on iggy? Well there you have it. Its impossible to even talk with much less debate with an incorrigible delusional troll, [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stufff/felch.gif[/image] like felch boy.

lovmuffin -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:20:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ORIGINAL: thompsonx We're all laughing too That takes a whole lot less balls than showing up at building 12 with your toes and money [sm=abducted.gif] More chin music No need to show up Mr Badass. Even world renowned experts can't hit a fast moving one inch target at 25 yards with any consistency let alone double tap it within a third of a second. No one in their right mind is going to travel to California and let Thompson the Sharpshooter blast away at their toes. It just isn't going to happen. This whole notion of yours is absurd and laughable.

BamaD -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:29:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ORIGINAL: thompsonx We're all laughing too That takes a whole lot less balls than showing up at building 12 with your toes and money [sm=abducted.gif] More chin music No need to show up Mr Badass. Even world renowned experts can't hit a fast moving one inch target at 25 yards with any consistency let alone double tap it within a third of a second. No one in their right mind is going to travel to California and let Thompson the Sharpshooter blast away at their toes. It just isn't going to happen. This whole notion of yours is absurd and laughable. And lost in the arguing about if he could do it is the fact that it started with him claiming that shooting someone in the foot is as effective as shooting them in the chest.

lovmuffin -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:33:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ORIGINAL: thompsonx We're all laughing too That takes a whole lot less balls than showing up at building 12 with your toes and money [sm=abducted.gif] More chin music No need to show up Mr Badass. Even world renowned experts can't hit a fast moving one inch target at 25 yards with any consistency let alone double tap it within a third of a second. No one in their right mind is going to travel to California and let Thompson the Sharpshooter blast away at their toes. It just isn't going to happen. This whole notion of yours is absurd and laughable. And lost in the arguing about if he could do it is the fact that it started with him claiming that shooting someone in the foot is as effective as shooting them in the chest. Which brings us back around to "shooting to wound is a bad idea".

BamaD -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:37:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ORIGINAL: thompsonx We're all laughing too That takes a whole lot less balls than showing up at building 12 with your toes and money [sm=abducted.gif] More chin music No need to show up Mr Badass. Even world renowned experts can't hit a fast moving one inch target at 25 yards with any consistency let alone double tap it within a third of a second. No one in their right mind is going to travel to California and let Thompson the Sharpshooter blast away at their toes. It just isn't going to happen. This whole notion of yours is absurd and laughable. And lost in the arguing about if he could do it is the fact that it started with him claiming that shooting someone in the foot is as effective as shooting them in the chest. Which brings us back around to "shooting to wound is a bad idea". To prove his point he would have to agree to simultanious shooting, him at the other persons foot, the other person at his center mass, and see who is more capable of fighting 30 seconds later.

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:53:35 AM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx I am pretty sure you have stated that you would like a 1911 because you did not have one. And you expand that to mean I don't own an automatic? No bozo...I said 1911.

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 9:59:09 AM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne People sometimes wonder why I have felch on iggy? Well there you have it. Its impossible to even talk with much less debate with an incorrigible delusional troll, [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stufff/felch.gif[/image] Another family photo?

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 10:02:58 AM)
ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ORIGINAL: thompson No need to show up Mr Badass. Even world renowned experts can't hit a fast moving one inch target at 25 yards with any consistency let alone double tap it within a third of a second. No one in their right mind is going to travel to California and let Thompson the Sharpshooter blast away at their toes. It just isn't going to happen. This whole notion of yours is absurd and laughable. Seems to me the only ones doing the laughing are the chairborn rangers with a wet squib

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 10:04:21 AM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx And lost in the arguing about if he could do it is the fact that it started with him claiming that shooting someone in the foot is as effective as shooting them in the chest. No...what I said is that shooting for com has the advantage to punkassmotherfuckers of leaving fewer witnesses.

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 10:06:08 AM)
ORIGINAL: lovmuffin Which brings us back around to "shooting to wound is a bad idea". Which is what all of your copsucker blogs say.

thompsonx -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 10:08:41 AM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD To prove his point he would have to agree to simultanious shooting, him at the other persons foot, the other person at his center mass, and see who is more capable of fighting 30 seconds later. Liar...that was hardly the issue. If the other person has a gun then why would they be running towards me? Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Real0ne -> RE: Does self defense allow you to beat someone to death"? (4/8/2016 10:12:14 AM)
holy fuckeroids the troll is working overtime! * IGNORED * - 4/8/2016 9:53:35 AM thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 674 * IGNORED * - 4/8/2016 9:59:09 AM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 675 * IGNORED * - 4/8/2016 10:02:58 AM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 676 * IGNORED * - 4/8/2016 10:04:21 AM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 677 * IGNORED * - 4/8/2016 10:06:08 AM thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. * IGNORED * - 4/8/2016 10:08:41 AM New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. someone must have pissed in his cheerios

Page: << < prev 32 33 [34] 35 36 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875