DesideriScuri -> RE: Much respect for this guy... (5/27/2014 8:22:10 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML So, while Cuban was not defending Sterling's comments he was offering mediation for them (we all have prejudices and there is a difference between what we say and what we do) and he did object to the league forcing an owner to sell his team (a very slippery slope) Like I said, He was quite explicit he wasn't defending Sterling. Simplistic. The real issue is not what he wasn't doing BUT what he was doing. He was attempting to head off a vote by owners to take away another owner's franchise. Now a moot point since the Sterlings are preparing to sell. From your own ESPN link:quote:
"But at the same time, that's a decision I make. I think you've got to be very, very careful when you start making blanket statements about what people say and think, as opposed to what they do. It's a very, very slippery slope. "Again, there's no excuse for his positions. There's no excuse for what [Sterling] said. There's no excuse for anybody to support racism. There's no place for it in our league, but there's a very, very, very slippery slope." ... Houston Rockets owner Leslie Alexander presented an opposing view to Cuban's, telling the Houston Chronicle that he wanted Sterling forced out of the league. Like Cuban, Alexander interpreted the NBA constitution as not affording the commissioner the power to remove an owner for any reason except gambling. However, Alexander said he suggested to Silver that all the Clippers players could be given the option to become free agents after this season, a step toward driving Sterling out of the league. ... "In this country, people are allowed to be morons," Cuban said. "They're allowed to be stupid. They're allowed to think idiotic thoughts. Cuban used the example of a black kid in a hoodie. Upon further reflection, he felt that was a poor example, given the Trayvon Martin shooting, so he apologized for using that example. I haven't seen any proof that there was outrage in the Martin family, though there could have been. It's entirely possible that Cuban made his apology in case there was any hurt and pain brought on by his example. Personally, I'd rather someone apologize for saying something, just in case there was a negative impact than to offer it after the outrage occurs (if that's possible anyway). Forcing an apology from someone, even if it's just from public opinion, tends to not come across as genuine as an unforced apology. YRMV
|
|
|
|