|
Killerangel -> RE: Financial Domination rationale (6/1/2014 11:57:58 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FightingChains
I think the issue he is posing here is... is this people who actually want to financially dominate someone, or are these people just here to exploit people for money and personal gain, not really kinksters and actually just selfish and exploitative?
Should we accept all findommes here under the guise of kink, when we wouldn't accept such brazen and potentially destructive selfishness in the real world?
I question whether non-kinksters exploiting kinksters - and potentially destroying their financial lives - violates SSC and RACK, because it's deceptive about what they're really after: fulfilling both people's kink, or just being selfish pathetic women?
I don't know about anyone else, but I'd like the world at large to stay the hell out of my own bedroom and not be involved in the personal choices that i make for myself. I'll choose for myself thank you very much, if that means I willingly sign up for something that others may not be on board with, then so be it.
Not everyone involved in kink lives it 24/7, there are the occasional dabblers, are we going to set some overall standard of what level of kink deserves to be labeled as kinky as opposed to being posers or fakers? Who will set this standard of fakeness vs realness, and what criteria will they use?
Why in the world would anyone's motives be questioned as far as why they do a particular activity, does anyone really want watchdogs involved in their bedroom choices? The 50 shades enthusiast has as much right to using their fuzzy handcuffs on the weekends as the person keeping a gimp locked up in the basement. If a man pays to get his rocks off and a woman takes his money for that, it's between the two of them.
People exchanging kink for money are doing what they wish, why is this fake? Is there a test to pass to call yourself kinky? Everyone's motive is different, for some kink is sexual, some not. Why does someone's heart have to be involved in kink for it to be legit? It seems to be fine with the people doing it simply for fun. Then every kinky porn out there is probably fake, doesn't seem to stop men from watching them. Who says doing something for money negates the act or principal behind it? That's a large assumption to make. It seems to be fine with the people who are actually engaging in it and not standing by passing judgment on others.
What people do is up to them and the partners they engage with. I don't want anyone "saving" me out of a misguided attempt to help when I'm getting spanked or if I'm giving money to someone for a transaction. As an adult, I'm entitled to do as I see fit. If there are men running around here that are being taken advantage of financially, they should not in any way, shape, or form, have access to a computer and be on the internet. Would anyone here be up in arms about people making their own choices on buying a car, choosing a sports activity, or picking out a movie to watch?
The fin duck profiles that put their hands out for cash and call men worms are irritating, oh well, other things irritate me too but i'm not going to get in the way of whatever man out there wants the illusion of a pretty picture to hand over money to. Yes, I think findom is silly, who cares what I think, I say the men who want to engage in this are free to do so, just as I am free to do whatever I want as well.
People make bad choices all day long, however it's none of my business what other adults choose to do with their lives and I surely don't want anyone else sticking their nose into my own bad choices and telling me I can't do something. Who cares what the Dommes position is, if they're "into" fin dom for esoteric reasons or grubby ones...if a man chooses to engage with them then that is his adult choice. If he goes into bankruptcy for his choice of how he fulfills his kink then he is a dumbass, you can't blame the woman for taking money that was freely given.
|
|
|
|
