Kirata
Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006 From: USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle If killing someone is 'safe' what is dangerous? In some cases, not killing them. quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle This oxymoron is an example of the kind of perverse double thought and double speak necessitated by trying to make the brutal business of executing people sound more palatable. It is a feature of pro-killing discourse that it favours euphemisms and double speak over plain language. Brutal connotes savage, crude, coarse. A lethal injection is far from "brutal". Moreover, to brand support for execution as a "pro-killing" stance is to wield a brush crafted for effect rather than accuracy. So I think it's fairly clear where the double-speak is coming from. In my opinion, locking someone up in a concrete box for the rest of their life is good deal more cruel. And if you're looking for brutality, a prison is the place to find it. quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Note, for example, the tendency to use "ultimate sacrifice", another favourite of theirs, when they mean 'cold blooded revenge'. I have never seen an execution described as someone making the "ultimate sacrifice," and I seriously doubt that you have either. Paying the "ultimate price," yes, but that's rather a different matter. So I think you're getting a little carried away with your preaching. At the rate you're going, you'll be wanting the faithful to stand and sing a hymn next. K.
< Message edited by Kirata -- 6/18/2014 2:25:04 AM >
|