FalseProfiles -> RE: Micromanagement (7/11/2006 3:54:54 AM)
|
Yes, All true slaves being property by mutual consent,should be micromanaged. After all, a slave is not suppossed to have free will,rights or freedom. Having said that,it is important that there exists a mutual trust and respect for both the dominant Owner and Submissive Slaves roles in life. Each compliments the other and contributes to making both parties feel more secure with themselves abnd each other. The slave must worship her owner and look after him. The Owner must take all measures to look after his slave,which is after all,his most reasured and valuable possession. All her needs in all three dimensions of her existance must be met. She must also meet her masters needs. Ultimately she becomes an integral part of him and he an integral part of her,even though one is the owner and the other the property. Some slaves will never be happy unless all decision making is removed from them and placed into the hands of their beloved and trusted owner. Abdication of all the responsibilities they have when free is a natural consequence of being in irrevocable slavery. Many respondents are not true slaves,but more conditional submissives,they decide what will and will not happen during their usually short term association with their so called dominant. Being freeborn by nature and inclination but with submissive tendencies,those tendencies often revolve around sexual gratification moreso that being of true service. Only a true slave or master who has micromanaged or been micromanaged can truelly answer your question.
|
|
|
|