RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless

RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MrRodgers -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/26/2014 10:49:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Well the other troubling aspect is that the suit was brought by Pepsi, because they didn't like the labor oversight. See, this is America so it's always...all about money. I wonder where Walmart was, they pumping up the food stamp rolls and really seeking to get slaves back ?

DomKen -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/26/2014 11:13:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Well the other troubling aspect is that the suit was brought by Pepsi, because they didn't like the labor oversight. Some one or other as going to challenge the NLRB's quorum who did it is really not relevant.

Musicmystery -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/26/2014 1:11:11 PM)
Sure it is. Another manifestation of who's really running this country. The regulated don't like the regulators, they play politics.

truckinslave -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/28/2014 9:48:52 AM)
Wasn't he a professor of con law? Why doesn't making clearly illegal appointments constitute "high crimes and misdemeanors"?

Sanity -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/28/2014 9:55:26 AM)
Even his own appointees smacked his stupid clown ass down

MrRodgers -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/28/2014 10:02:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave Wasn't he a professor of con law? Why doesn't making clearly illegal appointments constitute "high crimes and misdemeanors"? I guess for the same reasons torture and outing a CIA field agent didn't. There are impeachment articles drawn up against every president. They never make it out of committee (Clinton was more hated) because they will never survive the senate. Obviously, lying about a blow job in the oval office is much more important than lying about WMD's

MrRodgers -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/28/2014 10:04:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Even his own appointees smacked his stupid clown ass down That's because any repub could be another Mussolini and other repubs still wouldn't smack him down. The Reagan rule.

MrRodgers -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/28/2014 10:08:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave Wasn't he a professor of con law? Why doesn't making clearly illegal appointments constitute "high crimes and misdemeanors"? This is all a joke and even the SCOTUS knows it. 3 senators hanging around does not constitute being 'in session.' It is not a quorum and no senate work can get done. The filibuster is much worse yet no suits on that.

Sanity -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/28/2014 10:36:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Even his own appointees smacked his stupid clown ass down That's because any repub could be another Mussolini and other repubs still wouldn't smack him down. The Reagan rule. Roberts Ok'd Obamacare, but don't let the facts interfere with your train of thought

Sanity -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/28/2014 10:37:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers This is all a joke and even the SCOTUS knows it. 3 senators hanging around does not constitute being 'in session.' It is not a quorum and no senate work can get done. The filibuster is much worse yet no suits on that. Right, all nine justices...

truckinslave -> RE: Our Big-Eared "Constitutional Scholar" Clueless (6/29/2014 6:58:09 AM)
quote: This is all a joke and even the SCOTUS knows it. Obviously SCOTUS believes the law is not a joke. Unlike you.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125