Zonie63 -> RE: 133 G77 Nations Vow To Destroy America’s New World Order (7/1/2014 6:53:04 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Louve00 I reflected on the sentence of 133 G77 and as you pointed out it didn't make much sense to me, and I wanted to know why the numbers were placed as such. I found a link that describes the stated title as: The Next World Order The organization is officially called the ‘Group of 77 and China’, but the alliance actually includes 133 nations. Showing just how much influence they have, their meeting this weekend in Bolivia was opened with a keynote speech by United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. In the audience were over 30 heads of state from around the world and official representatives from over 100 more governments. Also illustrating the organization’s growing influence, China isn’t even a member of the G77, but insisted on participating anyway in a show of unity with the globe’s Next World Order. Link here But with that said and aside, it's comforting to me that these poorer countries don't have the resources AND have the corruption that could pose a real threat to us. But what I gather from any of these links is, while we are not the only country that is part of the G20, it seems the main target of hatred goes to America alone, with China wanting to participate in the G77, along with being in the G20. Edited to add: I don't know what to think. I hope it is one big silly conspiracy, but I'm beginning to wonder otherwise. And then too, still not every nation is included. There is 175 nations. Minus the 20 from the G20 = 155 nations. So why did they leave out 22 nations? And which ones were left out? I don't think it's any kind of conspiracy, as it's not unusual for nations to come together based on a set of perceived common interests. I'm not sure what they think they're going to accomplish by destroying (or attempting to destroy) "America's New World Order," since they're apparently referring to an "order" advocated by globalist ideologues and governments of multiple nations, not just America. Another thing I try to keep in mind is that the governments which comprise this group of nations also have to worry about their own positions and placate their own populations. Looking at it somewhat cynically, I can see where America could be used as a convenient scapegoat to explain away corruption, mismanagement, and other internal rot existent under many of these governments. On the other hand, stories like this, which speak of a large coalition of nations vowing to destroy America, might also further entrench Americans and feed the militaristic/interventionist idea that there are numerous "enemies of freedom and democracy" around the world. I don't know that it would be considered "conspiracy theory," although whenever there are perceptions of rising anti-Americanism in the world, it tends to spread fear among the electorate and could push some moderates and undecideds into a more hawkish direction.
|
|
|
|