eulero83
Posts: 1470
Joined: 11/4/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: Tkman117 I stand corrected then :P For us it's about 6000 a semester if you exclude first year student residence and the student meal plans. Not terribly expensive but it can be pretty costly, especially when our current conservative government isn't helping much in the way of lowering our costs. And if they did the money would come from taxes which come from? Just because you pay for something via taxes doesn't mean you don't pay. "the problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other peoples money" you really like that quote, don't you? Anyway what kind of services a governament provides or not has nothing to do with socialism, it has with the concepts of public interest and public expenditure (it is actually untrue that taxes pay those services). Public interest is what a governament is supposed to pursue, in some countries having an educated and healty people is considered a primary need (like defence, law enforcement, infrastructures etc.), for the whole society so it is a duty of the governament to organize an education or a health care system affordable for the population. This services are paid by public expenditure that comes before tax collection since we don't use anymore currencies directly linked to silver or gold. So the country prints the money, (in us or eurozone the country issue bonds) with those paper pays the services, those money circulates producing added value and the governament collect taxes to control inflation and debt. The reason you cover the most expensive services with income and corporative taxes' collection and not for example applying fees is that you don't want lower income people to run out of money and so destroy the internal market, that's another way to say what mnottertail just wrote. Considering capital and private initiative the solution to all the problems is as moronic as considering it to be state ownership and production for use.
|