RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 11:47:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You are a liar and nutsacker. Not at all an unusual combination.



Just what did I lie about? You do understand what a lesbian is right? And I don't think it takes much reading comprehension to figure out which of the two of us is obsessed with nutsackers. After all you mention then in damn near every post. And as far as being a nutsacker, you haven't been able to define them so that's really a meaningless insult at this point. So I can only conclude that you are talking out of your ass again. what a surprise. Now why don't you run along to the nearest airport bathroom and see if you calm yourself down for a bit.


Oh, I have defined them shiteater. The fact that you are too fucking cretinous to comprehend it is of little concern to anyone. You shine brightly.




mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 11:48:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
And as far as being a nutsacker, you haven't been able to define them so that's really a meaningless insult at this point.


Really, I just see that term as code for "This post isn't worth reading; skip to the next one."


Nobody much of any intellect bothers with your cretinous shit, twatwaffle.




Raiikun -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 11:52:15 AM)

See and here I thought using name calling to hide one's lack of any form of rational argument was something most ceased doing during elementary or middle school.




LafayetteLady -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 11:55:29 AM)

The ruling is very limitedin its scope. While I don't agree with it,some here are blowing it way out of proportion.

Daddysatyr is right in the closely held prive companies. Publicly traded corporation cannot applythis ruling. Further, thecompanies who DO wish to use the exemption must apply to use it and it can be denied and fought. Should those companies go public they will lose the exemption, which only applies to not provided birth control. It is an exemption to the ACA. Where the concept of a Muslim dress code comes into play is pretty far fetched.





mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 11:55:29 AM)

Nope, my arguments are rational. Nothing is hiding, and fuckheads are fuckheads is simply a tautology. Too bad you lack the insight needed to make rational arguments, and instead come up with puerile butthurted buncombe.




Raiikun -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:00:10 PM)

I think you're mistaking "slight amusement at the inane ramblings of someone at a fraction of my intelligence" as "butthurt." You really shouldn't give into wishful thinking.




Musicmystery -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:01:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

See and here I thought using name calling to hide one's lack of any form of rational argument was something most ceased doing during elementary or middle school.

You new here?




thishereboi -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:02:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You are a liar and nutsacker. Not at all an unusual combination.



Just what did I lie about? You do understand what a lesbian is right? And I don't think it takes much reading comprehension to figure out which of the two of us is obsessed with nutsackers. After all you mention then in damn near every post. And as far as being a nutsacker, you haven't been able to define them so that's really a meaningless insult at this point. So I can only conclude that you are talking out of your ass again. what a surprise. Now why don't you run along to the nearest airport bathroom and see if you calm yourself down for a bit.


Oh, I have defined them shiteater. The fact that you are too fucking cretinous to comprehend it is of little concern to anyone. You shine brightly.



shiteater, damn ron, I expected a better comeback than that. You disappoint me.




thishereboi -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:03:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
And as far as being a nutsacker, you haven't been able to define them so that's really a meaningless insult at this point.


Really, I just see that term as code for "This post isn't worth reading; skip to the next one."


Nobody much of any intellect bothers with your cretinous shit, twatwaffle.




well twatwaffle was a little better but not much, Surely you can do better than that. Come on, show us how really mature you can be.




mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:03:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

I think you're mistaking "slight amusement at the inane ramblings of someone at a fraction of my intelligence" as "butthurt." You really shouldn't give into wishful thinking.


a fraction of your intelligence? Boy, you cant find your own ass with two hands and a flashlight, nor pour piss out of a boot. And you demonstrate that continuously.




mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:05:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
And as far as being a nutsacker, you haven't been able to define them so that's really a meaningless insult at this point.


Really, I just see that term as code for "This post isn't worth reading; skip to the next one."


Nobody much of any intellect bothers with your cretinous shit, twatwaffle.




well twatwaffle was a little better but not much, Surely you can do better than that. Come on, show us how really mature you can be.



We are waiting for your tour de force of maturity here, Stewie.





Raiikun -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:18:42 PM)

Okay, I'd said "slight amusement", but I have to admit, I laughed out loud. It's like watching a talking gerbil with tourettes.




mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:24:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

Okay, I'd said "slight amusement", but I have to admit, I laughed out loud. It's like watching a talking gerbil with tourettes.


You are like watching a mentally handicapped sewer rat with diarrhea.




Raiikun -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 12:36:55 PM)

-2 for the lack of creativity.
-4 for the lack of any factual basis.

BUT!

+3 for the funny mental imagery.




mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 1:16:26 PM)

-10 for usual dipshittery.
-10 for lack of factual basis.
-10 for lack of reality.
+1 for special idiot points. You are weapons grade stupid.

+8 for portraying a broken toilet seat




subrob1967 -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 1:17:41 PM)

When did the USSC give Hobby Lobby the power to enslave people? From all the handwringing from the usual suspects, one would think that people wouldn't have a choice but work for those Bible thumping Bastards




mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 1:19:02 PM)

I expect their sales will be going down.




Kirata -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 1:27:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Ron, what are you going to do if women refrain from your pork?

Move to Puerto Rico I guess.

Oh hell, there are lots of places you can go. [:)]
[image]local://upfiles/235229/B47605ADE23B48A5AA88EDB1CE200715.jpg[/image]
Image credit: http://www.engrish.com

K.






mnottertail -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 1:27:44 PM)

ARRIGATO!!!!!!




servantforuse -> RE: SCOTUS on HOBBY LOBBY and religious freedom (6/30/2014 1:32:27 PM)

I think their sales might be going up. Remember the boycott against ChickFilet ?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125