FieryOpal
Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013 From: Maryland Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DaCat6 My post came about because of words like this: "whereas a kinkster can only be a Top at best. "and"Nor should any of us have to settle for kink & fetish sluts" and "Kinksters, (imho) do not put as much (if any) emphasis on control/power dynamic as D/sers tend to. Kinksters like to "play" D/s. They like the trappings, the outfits, the toys; they like to roleplay." It does sound as if your man is Dominant, and I agree it doesn't make any difference whether he labels himself or self-identifies as such. There is obviously no necessity; he has you, and isn't in the sub acquisition business. Regarding your quotes above: -- In this sense, a BDSM kinkster as play partner is a Top, but that doesn't make him a Dominant - which is the incongruency that OP has been encountering - is the point which was meant to be conveyed. -- Submissive males (and females, but I won't make assumptions for them) generally identify as sluts, even the ones who aren't into humiliation. Oral sluts, ass sluts, spanking sluts, bondage-bottom sluts, pain sluts, just all-around sluts, perhaps with the exception of some slaves. Then they self-identify as oral slaves (here it can be as an "oral slut slave") chastity slaves, footslaves, finslaves, bullslaves, toilet slaves, etc. The terminology having to do with sluttiness was not meant to be demeaning but reflects the mentality of the submissive.
_____________________________
Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau
|