Exidor
Posts: 135
Joined: 12/31/2011 Status: offline
|
I never liked to have people read to me, but I finally gave in when I was doing regular two or three day road trips. Now I have a job where I can listen to audiobooks while I work, so I spend a lot of time with the earbuds plugged in. Anything more than, say, 10 years old is usually of lower audio quality, and much older than that, was probably recorded on cassettes before being digitized. Even though it's professionally digitized and packaged, a lot of those sound like someone mumbling in a bucket. New stuff *usually* sounds better. There are a handful of readers who seem to work for several of the publishers. Unfortunately, one of the most common is the guy I call "Snot Man", who sounds like a heavy smoker with tuberculosis. I never can remember his name, but I should, as he's ruined a lot of stuff. My normal paper-reading speed is quite fast, and one of the things it toook... aa... looottt... oofff... geetttingg... uuussedd... tooooo... was how slowly audiobooks move by comparison. I guess you could turn the speed up until they sound like chipmunks on meth, but my player doesn't have a setting for that. On the other hand, the slower pace gives you time to think about what you're hearing, and a lot of books I'd enjoyed on paper turned out to be eaten up with stupid. For me, audiobooks are definitely not as good as paper (or even my tablet reader), but they beat listening to the same old music, blithering idiot DJs, or talk radio when I'm spending hours doing things that don't require a lot of attention, but where I can't read a book. > best I'll give you three "best of" SF/fantasy examples: SM Stirling's "In the Courts of the Crimson Kings" Charles Stross' "The Atrocity Archives" Terry Pratchett's "Small Gods"
|