|
FieryOpal -> RE: To sub men: please explain "service" housework fetish (7/19/2014 12:12:51 PM)
|
(Btw crwlon4, LMP wasn't referring to you, I don't believe.)
quote:
ORIGINAL: crwlon4
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Her post are pretty clear that it is "her way or the highway" That she expects service yet brings nothing to the table except her dirty dishes and her sore feet. What did I miss?
The way I read it, I didn't see her comment as the end game.
<snip>
... I do agree that there is such a thing as a no-strings sub.
See, therein lies the problem. It isn't so much a sub/Domme thing as it is the classic m/f misunderstanding that NO MEANS NO. NO doesn't mean maybe, or we'll see what happens.
If a Domme is saying, I'm looking for a non-sexual service sub, with no BDSM play, then this IS the end game.
(Naturally, this would be a Domme not named FieryOpal. [sm=kiss.gif] )
A male (or possibly female) sub hoping that his fine ass will somehow sway her to find him attractive is mere fantasy--a huge longshot.
There's a female service slave who doesn't want a sexual relationship with her Master. And this is what they agreed upon, no sex. True story.
If one day he changes his mind and starts thinking he is entitled to demand sex from her, she is ambivalent.
Oh, it all depends on her mood, her attraction level, whether she's on her period, etc., etc. Because she keeps her option open for being "forced."
IMO, she doesn't want to take responsibility for her own sexuality, nor to take enjoyment in having sexual gratification for herself.
In this particular case, this Master would be in a world of trouble with this type of submissive. She could arbitrarily decide that she had been sexually and/or physically assaulted and have him arrested.
There may be no-strings subs, but there needs to be no hidden agenda. Anything less than that is dishonest.
[Edited for grammar]
|
|
|
|
