FieryOpal -> RE: Subs and slaves with outside partners???? (7/12/2014 5:46:14 PM)
|
OP, it would appear that this attached lady is seeking Temporary Power Exchange, not Total Power Exchange. From what I viewed of her profile text previously, she wants a Dom who is NOT into BDSM play, and I believe she indicated she was NOT interested in having any kinky sex. It was unclear whether she expected to have ANY sort of sexual relationship with this imaginary non-kinky Dom. (They exist, but she'd have better luck replacing her existing vanilla partner with a more dominant vanilla partner.) She wanted the Domination/submission dimension of her spare time to consist of being dominated. Without the element of play in this arrangement, I don't see how she can delineate her allegiance to both men in her life. I interpret the word "total" as meaning just that. Total. Not Partial Power Exchange, not Part-Time Power Exchange. (per OP's usage of term "TPE") This lady could be a bedroom submissive, with a bedroom-only power exchange dynamic, but this is not what she is/was seeking. Ownership denotes making a D/s-M/s commitment, where ordinarily the s-type's loyalties are not divided. For her to be an *owned* or even a co-owned submissive, she would need to be available for ownership without a conflict of interest. There is an old saying that no [wo]man can serve two Masters; for either s/he will hate the one, and love the other; or else s/he will hold to the one, and despise the other. I don't see how she could pull this off in real life, and I suspect this lady is stuck in an on-line fantasy world.
|
|
|
|