CloakedProtector
Posts: 70
Joined: 1/5/2007 Status: offline
|
rubberloverhk, the naming goes with the relational form. It has been somewhat changed and suffered quite a bit from all kinds of internet definitions. While you'll find several explanations for it this is the one I kept using. Three relationship types. Master or Mistress vs slave, Dom or Domme vs sub(missive), Top vs bottom. The first relationship type M/s used the Master/slave wording and is characterized by a 24/7, people involved living together. The role applies continuously, partners may be but must not be married, exists in mono and poly variations, by definition exclusive (couple/household). Makes 24/7 TPE possible, can be with or without contract. The second one D/s Dom(me)/sub is also a 24/7, people not living together. The Dom(me) exerts the role 24/7 but uses, besides visits, other means. Subs get orders to execute alone and report back, possibly checked by the Dom(me). D/s became a lot more interesting with modern means such as web-cams, mobiles, chat's, etc. The relationship has a number of priorities as very often at least one of the involved parties is in another relationship and parties have jobs, kids and other things to attend too. Mono or non-exclusive (mostly on Dominant side) hardly used in poly with the exception of occasional people joining for play, Mostly contracts are not used but can be. The third form, T/b is a play window relationship type. Start, end and play topic (and sometimes even roles) are negotiated upfront and play is restricted to the window. Most often no contracts. mono or non-exclusive. This model is mainly used by pro's (although they may not call it so) people switching roles and people searching non 24/7 play in occasional or longer term play-partner relationships. The most important characteristic of T/b is that parties are EQUALS outside the play window. The role applies only during play windows. So the submissive party goes actually by 3 names in BDSM: slave, sub and bottom. Now that being said, you'll find a lot of resistance against EVERY definition of slave vs submissive. The reason is that there are a large number of submissives that are not waiting for any BDSM play but just want to full-fill their submissiveness inside a relationship, 24/7. And you can hardly blame them for not calling themselves slaves, can you. Therefore the case is simplified by saying that the above definition is within a BDSM context and not every submissive is practising BDSM . So maybe as a bottom line one could say: Both,or all 3, want the submissive role and what they are called in the BDSM community kind of grows out of the relational type there are in and according to the teachings in wording they adhere too.
|