Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Rhetorical Question


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Rhetorical Question Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Rhetorical Question - 7/21/2014 3:37:27 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Try looking up the difference between "its" and "it's" grammar boy.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Rhetorical Question - 7/21/2014 5:11:45 AM   
CaptR


Posts: 425
Joined: 4/25/2012
Status: offline
My apologies FO. That response was directed to gauge. I was half asleep reading with tired eyes when I wrote it. Thank you for your positive input on this thread.

(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Rhetorical Question - 7/21/2014 9:30:13 AM   
FieryOpal


Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR

My apologies FO. That response was directed to gauge. I was half asleep reading with tired eyes when I wrote it. Thank you for your positive input on this thread.

No problem, not taken personally, and you're more than welcome. Posters often reply off of the last post. If you want, you can always preface your post with "FR" or "Fast Reply" before your main text.

A footnote of sorts on BitYakin's query. There are some Dominants who don't like to be called "Master" or "Mistress" regardless of the context, and others who insist upon it. In experiential terms, if you have been someone's Master before, you can certainly speak of your previous D/s-M/s relationship in this context without having to feel that you have attained arbitrary BDSM levels of *mastery*, since this is such a subjective matter.

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Rhetorical Question - 7/21/2014 12:50:27 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin


quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR

You've missed the point of the entire post. Which is ok, a couple of responders understood and I'm thankful for that. My intent was to start a discussion whatever response I received be it inflammatory or constructive. You seem to be having trouble with the definition of rhetorical though. It's a question that doesn't require an answer. It's meant to encourage discussion. I'll concede your point regarding bdsm. I could have used another example. But to suggest there is no skill involved is a statement I can't agree with.There are skills utilized in bondage, skills employed in delivering discipline, skill is a necessity if you're a responsible sadist and so on. Skill is practiced or should be in all lifestyles. Even "people skills" qualify. As for my description of masters in trade you backed that up. Master and journeyman are accepted in industry as having the same meaning. They have reached the pinnacle of expertise in their respective fields. Addressing now the "Master of people." Again you are saying the same thing I allude to in my original post. You're nothing to anybody except yourself until somebody (In this case my submissive) says you are. We're not that far apart on any of this except the meaning of rhetorical , people skills and the ability to maintain a healthy helpful attitude. Oh, there are no paragraphs because I'm on my phone and I find it tedious to maintain proper prose. My apologies.


not sure about all trades, but in plumbing a "master" is quite different from a "journeyman"

after a 5 year apprenticeship you can get a journeyman license, after another 5 years as a journeyman you can get a master plumbers license. a journeyman cannot
take out a permit for a job, a master can. there are separate tests for journeyman and master

the journeyman test focuses more on ability to perform the work, the master more on theory and application of why It needs to be done a certain way.

here is a question more on topic, if a person has had a slave who considered him "master" and that relationship lasts several years, then ends, does he cease to be a "master"?

True enough but the only difference I've heard of and according to my research in the testing...is law. (1/2 the test...is legal for contracting) and thus insurance. A general contractor is much more pursued and is thus, licensed to do the whole bldg. or job.

The knowledge in the trade or 'mastery' of plumbing is basically the same. The analogy then becomes then that a 'master' of BDSM could bid and contract on it and get insurance for the 'job.' Say...loosely speaking.

Plumbing is not a very good example as you may know what the other tradesmen joke about plumbing anyway...hot on the left, cold on the right, water runs down hill and payday is on Friday. There's nothing technical about it. The 'theory' of plumbing is gravity and pressure...period.




(in reply to BitYakin)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Rhetorical Question - 7/21/2014 1:23:44 PM   
BitYakin


Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin


quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR

You've missed the point of the entire post. Which is ok, a couple of responders understood and I'm thankful for that. My intent was to start a discussion whatever response I received be it inflammatory or constructive. You seem to be having trouble with the definition of rhetorical though. It's a question that doesn't require an answer. It's meant to encourage discussion. I'll concede your point regarding bdsm. I could have used another example. But to suggest there is no skill involved is a statement I can't agree with.There are skills utilized in bondage, skills employed in delivering discipline, skill is a necessity if you're a responsible sadist and so on. Skill is practiced or should be in all lifestyles. Even "people skills" qualify. As for my description of masters in trade you backed that up. Master and journeyman are accepted in industry as having the same meaning. They have reached the pinnacle of expertise in their respective fields. Addressing now the "Master of people." Again you are saying the same thing I allude to in my original post. You're nothing to anybody except yourself until somebody (In this case my submissive) says you are. We're not that far apart on any of this except the meaning of rhetorical , people skills and the ability to maintain a healthy helpful attitude. Oh, there are no paragraphs because I'm on my phone and I find it tedious to maintain proper prose. My apologies.


not sure about all trades, but in plumbing a "master" is quite different from a "journeyman"

after a 5 year apprenticeship you can get a journeyman license, after another 5 years as a journeyman you can get a master plumbers license. a journeyman cannot
take out a permit for a job, a master can. there are separate tests for journeyman and master

the journeyman test focuses more on ability to perform the work, the master more on theory and application of why It needs to be done a certain way.

here is a question more on topic, if a person has had a slave who considered him "master" and that relationship lasts several years, then ends, does he cease to be a "master"?

True enough but the only difference I've heard of and according to my research in the testing...is law. (1/2 the test...is legal for contracting) and thus insurance. A general contractor is much more pursued and is thus, licensed to do the whole bldg. or job.

The knowledge in the trade or 'mastery' of plumbing is basically the same. The analogy then becomes then that a 'master' of BDSM could bid and contract on it and get insurance for the 'job.' Say...loosely speaking.

Plumbing is not a very good example as you may know what the other tradesmen joke about plumbing anyway...hot on the left, cold on the right, water runs down hill and payday is on Friday. There's nothing technical about it. The 'theory' of plumbing is gravity and pressure...period.







believe whatever you like about plumbing being EASY, a general contractor CANNOT pull permits to do plumbing work anyplace except maybe in jerkwater towns...

and NO the knowledge between a journeyman and master is not the same, the journeyman knows how to put the pieces together, the master knows WHY it needs to be done that way


and yes we all joke about each other, but 80% of my work comes from tradesmen in other trades who wouldn't even think of trying to do plumbing jobs for two reasons, A) they could make water come in and go away, but usually get stumped on the matter of venting, B) they know if an inspector is to be involved someone is going to want to see a PLUMBING LICENSE


and BTW it has ZERO to do with insurance, ANYONE can get insurance. a person who has never held a hammer EVER can go to an insurance company and get insurance to work in ANY TRADE he picks. the ins company WILL NOT ask to see his license

another lil detail you have wrong, a GC has ZERO licenses to do anything, the only license he has is a business license, he HIRES licensed people to do the work

another lil DETAIL, only three trades even REQUIRE licenses, plumbing and electrical and architectural. why do you thing that is?

maybe because architects have to make blue prints that are structurally sound so buildings don't collapse and kill people, electricians could cause a house to burn down, and plumbers could poison people...

wish I could put drawings here, I'd show you two examples of some things and let you tell me WHY one is correct and the other isn't. I doubt you could even see the DIFFERANCE between the two.

BTW, no 1/2 the test is NOT about LEGAL STUFF, its 100% about PLUMBING

https://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=utf-8&fr=slv1-&p=scope%20of%20a%20plumbing%20license%20test%20questions&type=

and yes I have taken BOTH in more than one state

PS, you even got the JOKE WRONG, it goes, shit runs down hill, don't chew your fingernails, and payday is on Friday...
HAHAH

< Message edited by BitYakin -- 7/21/2014 1:37:34 PM >

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Rhetorical Question - 7/21/2014 2:12:20 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
aNd the boss is a prick.

Someone had to do the punchline to that joke.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BitYakin)
Profile   Post #: 26
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Rhetorical Question Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078