orgasmdenial12 -> RE: Best & worst things to see in a Dom/me's profile? (8/14/2014 8:09:58 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Drenche THE GOOD: Turn-ons in a Dominant's Profile Text: 1) Good spelling and grammar. 2) Positive text that feels natural, fluid, original and unique. Sense of humor. 3) Information on their personality, goals, dreams, or life circumstances 4) Vanilla activities we might have in common outside BDSM. 5) Indications a well rounded person with family, hobbies, work, etc. 6) A realistic approach. Be out and honest about what you want. 7) Knowledge of what they are looking for, and not afraid to let me know. 8) Not playing chameleon by saying he likes whatever I like. 9) Signs of self-awareness, even if that means saying, "I don't know, yet." 10) Evidence of having done their homework on BDSM: dynamics, terminology, risks, rewards. Turn-ons in a Dominant's Profile Photos: 1) Face pictures, especially smiling pictures. 2) Pictures that hint at an interest or hobby (pets, musical instruments, working on a car). 3) Pictures that weren't taken in a mirror or with a webcam suggest actual social interactions. THE BAD: Red Flags in a Dominant's Profile Text: 1) All BDSM and/or sexual. A profile strictly about sex is a turn off. 2) Any demands for "NO LIMITS". Everyone has limits. 3) Demands that you use honorifics from the first contact. 4) Claims of experience that began before they were legal. 5) An interests list with "expert" beside almost everything. 6) Anyone who feels a lot of submissives aren't "true" or "real". 7) Proclamations of knowing the "one true way" based on "experience". 8) Warnings that imply THEY are Protectors and all other Dominants are predators. (Give me a break!) 9) Unrealistic expectations, rules, requirements. Ex: "Sleep all night with a mouthful of cock." 10) Dangerous self-aggrandizing: "You don't need a safe word. I know what I'm doing!" 11) Mention of "real dolcett" indicates a mental ward or coroner's office isn't far behind. 12) There's nothing more suspicious than someone telling you to trust them. Turn-offs in a Dominant's Profile Text: 1) Findom as a main focus. Ex: "...tribute is required." 2) Empty profile with little or no information. 3) Bad spelling and grammar, text speak, only one or two lines. 4) Banality: "Message me to know more." "Add me." "Anything you want to know, ask." 5) Negativity, badmouthing, bitching or bitterness: "Why do I bother?" 6) Entitlement: "I've been here for a week and can't find a woman!" 7) Complaints about fakes or, even worse, name and shaming. 8) Preaching, ranting, know-it-all tripe, conceit, arrogance, bigotry, sexism, superficiality. 9) Anyone who mentions "Holes". Ex: "I want a 3 holed slave!" 10) Critical of their ex/other users of the site/other people's bodies 11) On and on about how superior the dominant is and how the reader is just a pig/worm/wallet 12) Married and cheating: "... but my wife and I don't have sex, anymore." Turn-offs in a Dominant's Profile Photos: 1) Dick pics. (One thoughtfully composed dick pic, not as a primary, may or may not be forgiven.) 2) Asshole shots. Close up vagina shots. (Unforgivable? Is a thoughtfully composed asshole shot even possible?) 3) Pictures of their ex(es). 4) Pictures stolen from porn sites, especially unrealistic images. 5) Generic black and white bdsm photos often of a male in a suit and a humble-looking model. 6) Refusal to post face pictures (especially with the "I can't because of work" excuse). 7) Messy photo backgrounds indicate possibly lazy, unmotivated, unorganized or apathetic. 8) A whole gallery of "erotic" photos of them with no vanilla shots. I think this is a pretty good list of dos and don'ts. Shame we can't make this a sticky to direct newbie profile questions to it. I would only query a few of them - face pictures are obviously difficult for many people and I personally would never discuss work, either in my profile or expect to see it in anyone else's. BDSM is still a challenging, radical sexuality and not every profession is open to it. Mentioning your field of work could lead to being targetted by journalists or blackmailers. I also couldn't care less whether it's a selfie or a standard photo or an action shot - the point is to see what they look like, not be intimidated by their skydiving shots! quote:
ORIGINAL: Drenche Isn't there something to be said for being direct and up front about the obvious topic, not wasting everyone's time with your interest in random topics, and leaving those as enigma that will make for good conversation as you get to know each other? I think so. I use a person's profile to scan for dealbreakers and gold stars. For example, are they the right age, location, gender, sexuality, role, etc. Do we seem to be looking for similar things? Do we have similar levels of experience? If they pass all of that, then I move to conversation and enjoy discussing things more in depth. quote:
ORIGINAL: Drenche The other type of profile that is an automatic turnoff is anything to do with "taboo... I use this word in the 2nd sentence of my profile to convey something else, and have no interest in K9 and certainly don't want to give that impression. Thoughts? It doesn't personally work for me because I'm not into humiliation or degradation, but I can't speak for your target audience. It may make the right woman get shivery in all the right places. I would say though that a heavy emphasis on degrading and humiliating is one of my red flags as it seems to suggest that their sadism comes from a place of hate and disgust rather than attempting to enable mutual satisfaction, exploration and pleasure. It might be a nice idea to soften it with something like 'and of course, kiss it all better at the end' or something like that - if, of course, that is what you are into. quote:
ORIGINAL: Drenche I used to have some short stories which I wrote in my journal here, but removed them because I felt the journal detracts from the impact of the main content when the profile is viewed on the main page of the site (as opposed to viewing the full profile), which is how I assume our profiles are viewed 99% of the time (based on my own viewing habits and how seldom my own profile registers full views). Is having a cleaner-looking, stronger presentation on the main page a valid consideration, or is having interesting journal entries that important? The key breakthrough for me in terms of CM and profiles was this - you attract the same energy that you put out. I got tired of writing angry stuff about men who didn't read my profile - what was the point of complaining that they weren't reading it, when they weren't going to read the complaint either? Meanwhile, the men who would read it would be put off by my complaining, so it was a lose / lose scenario. So instead of trying to avoid negatives, I tried to actively attract positives - I put all my energy into something that literary men would read and enjoy and contact me because of. If you write your profile to appeal to women who are in a rush, who are attracted to simple, clean lines on a profile then that is who you will attract. If you write a long, thoughtful, reflective profile then you will attract women who like long, thoughtful, reflective writing. I wanted to attract literary, thoughtful, sexual men who got off on the sheer high of s&m sex, so I wrote a journal to try and encapsulate that. And it worked great. It's not that a journal is right or wrong, it's about appealing to the type of people you are looking for. The same rules about not complaining about fakes and pro-dommes would still apply though - no-one likes negativity.
|
|
|
|