Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed

Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

subrosaDom -> Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/9/2014 9:43:42 PM)
http://news.yahoo.com/knockout-game-attacker-asked-man-had-gun-punching-202027404.html So criminals FEAR an armed citizen. Shocking, isn't it.

BamaD -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/9/2014 9:48:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrosaDom http://news.yahoo.com/knockout-game-attacker-asked-man-had-gun-punching-202027404.html So criminals FEAR an armed citizen. Shocking, isn't it. How do you pretend a knife is a gun, and how do you fall for it. According to Ken, the expert on everything if he had said yes it would have increased his chance of being attacked.

Politesub53 -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:00:30 AM)
More trolling, no more and no less. Are you two idiots going to start a new thread every time someone is attacked, just to try and prove carrying guns is a good thing ? No need to reply, it was a rhetorical question.

subrosaDom -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:11:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 More trolling, no more and no less. Are you two idiots going to start a new thread every time someone is attacked, just to try and prove carrying guns is a good thing ? No need to reply, it was a rhetorical question. Only as long as others claim that more guns mean more crime or that carrying a gun increases your odds of being a victim of violent crime, etc. At that point, there will be no more need for our "idiocy." Seems to me that your post is more indicative of trolling, being that its only purpose is to call us idiots, than my post, which recounted something that happened in reality. As to why I replied, well, being an idiot, I have no idea what "rhetorical" means.

Politesub53 -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:19:36 AM)
Yawns.

thishereboi -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 6:38:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 More trolling, no more and no less. Are you two idiots going to start a new thread every time someone is attacked, just to try and prove carrying guns is a good thing ? No need to reply, it was a rhetorical question. If they do are you going to visit each one to show us how much of an ass you can be? No need to reply, it was a rhetorical question.

thompsonx -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:11:08 PM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom http://news.yahoo.com/knockout-game-attacker-asked-man-had-gun-punching-202027404.html So criminals The victim identified his attacker, who turned out to be 15-years old FEAR an armed citizen. Fearing that outcome, the victim pulled out a folding knife that he was carrying and pretended it was a gun, The attackers fled down the beach but were soon apprehended. Shocking, isn't it. Not terribly...a man takes a knife to a gunfight and so frightens his attackers that they run away. Lets continue with your premis. Would you have been satisfied if the victim had shot and killed this 15 year old? Now that the assailant is in jail do you feel he should be tried as an adult?

thompsonx -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:14:43 PM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD How do you pretend a knife is a gun, Obviously he did. and how do you fall for it. Obviously they did since they ran away.

thompsonx -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:20:50 PM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom Only as long as others claim that more guns mean more crime or that carrying a gun increases your odds of being a victim of violent crime, etc. That has been proved over and over to be untrue. Gun ownership in cuba is pretty close to 100%. Yes the govt down there is paranoid that the u.s. will attack them again but their gun crime rate is pretty low. The swiss seem to be pretty well armed also but no concurent level of gun crime. It would appear that you don't know much about gun crime or it's causes. As to why I replied, well, being an idiot, I have no idea what "rhetorical" means. Not knowing what a word means makes you ignorant not an idiot. Not knowing the difference makes you an idiot.

subrosaDom -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:37:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: subrosaDom http://news.yahoo.com/knockout-game-attacker-asked-man-had-gun-punching-202027404.html So criminals The victim identified his attacker, who turned out to be 15-years old FEAR an armed citizen. Fearing that outcome, the victim pulled out a folding knife that he was carrying and pretended it was a gun, The attackers fled down the beach but were soon apprehended. Shocking, isn't it. Not terribly...a man takes a knife to a gunfight and so frightens his attackers that they run away. Lets continue with your premis. Would you have been satisfied if the victim had shot and killed this 15 year old? Now that the assailant is in jail do you feel he should be tried as an adult? Would you have been satisfied if the 15-year-old had murdered the victim? Or is it the case that you can't murder anyone until you reach the age of majority? Yes, try the POS as an adult - it was clearly a crime of intention, not a 15-year-old getting into a playground fight with another kid and doing harm in the heat of the moment. It was premeditated. Big difference. Or he could get out in a year or two. Then what will you say to the family of the person he murders when he gets out. Or do you think recidivism is a conservative myth? They didn't think he had a knife. They thought he had a gun. Gun = scared = run away. Strange how that works.

subrosaDom -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:40:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: subrosaDom Only as long as others claim that more guns mean more crime or that carrying a gun increases your odds of being a victim of violent crime, etc. That has been proved over and over to be untrue. Gun ownership in cuba is pretty close to 100%. Yes the govt down there is paranoid that the u.s. will attack them again but their gun crime rate is pretty low. The swiss seem to be pretty well armed also but no concurent level of gun crime. It would appear that you don't know much about gun crime or it's causes. As to why I replied, well, being an idiot, I have no idea what "rhetorical" means. Not knowing what a word means makes you ignorant not an idiot. Not knowing the difference makes you an idiot. Regarding your first point, that isn't my claim, it's been others'. Hence my post. Regarding your second comment, your not recognizing sarcasm makes you _____ (go ahead and fill in the blank)?

servantforuse -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:44:39 PM)
If he is smart, he will now carry. I do.

subrosaDom -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:49:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrosaDom quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: subrosaDom Only as long as others claim that more guns mean more crime or that carrying a gun increases your odds of being a victim of violent crime, etc. That has been proved over and over to be untrue. Gun ownership in cuba is pretty close to 100%. Yes the govt down there is paranoid that the u.s. will attack them again but their gun crime rate is pretty low. The swiss seem to be pretty well armed also but no concurent level of gun crime. It would appear that you don't know much about gun crime or it's causes. As to why I replied, well, being an idiot, I have no idea what "rhetorical" means. Not knowing what a word means makes you ignorant not an idiot. Not knowing the difference makes you an idiot. Regarding your first point, that isn't my claim, it's been others'. Hence my post. Regarding your second comment, your not recognizing sarcasm makes you _____ (go ahead and fill in the blank)? Hit the wrong button on edit. Apologies for the duplicate post.

BamaD -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 1:51:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrosaDom quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: subrosaDom http://news.yahoo.com/knockout-game-attacker-asked-man-had-gun-punching-202027404.html So criminals The victim identified his attacker, who turned out to be 15-years old FEAR an armed citizen. Fearing that outcome, the victim pulled out a folding knife that he was carrying and pretended it was a gun, The attackers fled down the beach but were soon apprehended. Shocking, isn't it. Not terribly...a man takes a knife to a gunfight and so frightens his attackers that they run away. Lets continue with your premis. Would you have been satisfied if the victim had shot and killed this 15 year old? Now that the assailant is in jail do you feel he should be tried as an adult? Would you have been satisfied if the 15-year-old had murdered the victim? Or is it the case that you can't murder anyone until you reach the age of majority? Yes, try the POS as an adult - it was clearly a crime of intention, not a 15-year-old getting into a playground fight with another kid and doing harm in the heat of the moment. It was premeditated. Big difference. Or he could get out in a year or two. Then what will you say to the family of the person he murders when he gets out. Or do you think recidivism is a conservative myth? Nobody said the kid should have been shot, but he wouldn't have attacked if he thought the victim had a gun, Thompsonx can't seem to put together a rational thought.

thompsonx -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:22:19 PM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom Would you have been satisfied if the 15-year-old had murdered the victim? This would be a construct of your mind and not contained in the op or the link. Or is it the case that you can't murder anyone until you reach the age of majority? These exist in your mind and not in the minds of normal human beings. Yes, try the POS as an adult - it was clearly a crime of intention, not a 15-year-old getting into a playground fight with another kid and doing harm in the heat of the moment. It was premeditated. Big difference. There is a reason that children are not treated as adults in the criminal justice system. That you are ignorant of that would indicate that you are too young to be posting on this forum. Or he could get out in a year or two. Then what will you say to the family of the person he murders when he gets out. Or do you think recidivism is a conservative myth? Since you asked me what I think...I think you have the reasoning abilites of a nine year old and that you have your head up your ass most of the time. They didn't think he had a knife. They thought he had a gun. Gun = scared = run away. Strange how that works. Since I have spent a little time carrying a gun and killing people for a living I don't think it strange at all. I also do not find it strange that punks when confronted will act like punks.

thompsonx -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:23:54 PM)
ORIGINAL: servantforuse If he is smart, he will now carry. I do. What else could we expect from a pussy?

thompsonx -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:28:28 PM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: subrosaDom Only as long as others claim that more guns mean more crime or that carrying a gun increases your odds of being a victim of violent crime, etc. That has been proved over and over to be untrue. Gun ownership in cuba is pretty close to 100%. Yes the govt down there is paranoid that the u.s. will attack them again but their gun crime rate is pretty low. The swiss seem to be pretty well armed also but no concurent level of gun crime. It would appear that you don't know much about gun crime or it's causes. As to why I replied, well, being an idiot, I have no idea what "rhetorical" means. Not knowing what a word means makes you ignorant not an idiot. Not knowing the difference makes you an idiot. Regarding your first point, that isn't my claim, it's been others'. Hence my post. Their claim and your post are pure unadulterated bullshit. If you disagree with them then post up evidence not your putid gibbersh about some imagined left/right paradigm. Regarding your second comment, your not recognizing sarcasm makes you _____ (go ahead and fill in the blank)? Not being a mind reader and having read many of your ignorant and mindnumbingly stupid opinions I thought you were telling the truth.

Politesub53 -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:32:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 More trolling, no more and no less. Are you two idiots going to start a new thread every time someone is attacked, just to try and prove carrying guns is a good thing ? No need to reply, it was a rhetorical question. If they do are you going to visit each one to show us how much of an ass you can be? No need to reply, it was a rhetorical question. You have always been a troll with little to add to any issue. Do you really think Bama and Subrosa are starting these type of threads over and over because they care about the victims ? They dont, they are trolling, just as Sanity is with his constant attacks on Obama.

thompsonx -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 4:34:18 PM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD Nobody said the kid should have been shot, but he wouldn't have attacked if he thought the victim had a gun, That would be your ignorant unsubstantiated opinion. No moron he and his two punk friends picked someone that they felt they could intimidate. Do you really think these punks would approach a person who could whip their asses with one hand? Then and only then did they check to see if he was packing heat. Did you notice how quickly they fled when they thought he was armed? Thompsonx can't seem to put together a rational thought. Yet I seem to be able to point out your irrationallity on a regular bassis.

joether -> RE: Punched in face after admitting he was UNarmed (8/10/2014 9:32:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: ORIGINAL: subrosaDom Only as long as others claim that more guns mean more crime or that carrying a gun increases your odds of being a victim of violent crime, etc. That has been proved over and over to be untrue. Gun ownership in cuba is pretty close to 100%. Yes the govt down there is paranoid that the u.s. will attack them again but their gun crime rate is pretty low. The swiss seem to be pretty well armed also but no concurent level of gun crime. It would appear that you don't know much about gun crime or it's causes. By itself, that could be a curious finding. Yet both those nations have several other things going on around it. During the time Somalia was in anarchy, everyone had guns, and there was tons of crimes going on (petty on up to 'crimes against humanity'). Syria has plenty of guns, and huge amounts of crime. Likewise, which nation has the biggest square footage of prison space: A ) Sweden, B ) Cuba, or C ) The United States of America. I'm simply saying that there are an abundance of other factors at work, that bring a nation's crime rate low or high. The availability of firearms does not have as much significance as those in some circles would have the nation/world believe.

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875