dreamlady -> RE: Why are women generally seen as the weaker sex? (3/30/2015 11:29:49 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness I'm sorry, is that an attempt to 'out' me, in the hopes that a Moderator will come swooping in and save you from the bad man? For reference, I was only banned because the moderators here used to look after their friends instead of engaging in impartial moderation. The new regime doesn't seem interested in using moderation to win arguments for people. There's no comparison between Nookie and you. She disagreed politely. You completely lost your equilibrium and now you're attempting to recover and claim otherwise? How funny! [:D] I don't know what your track record is for getting threads shut down, but I would like to see this one stay intact. This isn't your first rodeo, and you don't need to be told that unless you are in the less-moderated Feisty section, you are allowed to challenge post content but not to make personal attacks on posters. The fact that you deemed it necessary to resort to ad hominem in multiple posts reveals the weakness of your position as to not holding water and the frailty of your own unstable equilibrium. quote:
ORIGINAL: sexyred1 If you perceive any of the venomous and bigoted drivel you read to be worthy of reading, then good for you. Although you do realize, don't you, that he speaks of Dominant women as equally bad as he does sub men? Well, according to him, submissive males are "evolutionary dead ends" http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4797125 . . . with whom he has so much experience ostensibly that he can come to this recklessly sweeping conclusion. I believe he has also declared in the past that there is no such thing as Dominant women, that they don't exist. Evidently he's been brushing up on his Horatio Alger backlog - when he isn't busy shadowboxing, that is, to maintain his physical superiority - but skipped the pivotal one on How to Win Friends and Influence People. DreamLady
|
|
|
|