littleladybug -> RE: pushing limits (9/11/2014 12:42:26 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: IrishMist LOL...I like you...so keep that in that mind as you read the rest quote:
It's a line that is just not crossed. That right there says it all You have stated a boundary that if crossed, would cause you irreversible damage... Take it a step further though. The words legal trouble...generally, mean the same thing to everyone. Yet...there are different kinds of 'legal trouble' a person can get into. The one's that end you in jail or prison...are obviously the ones that you should refrain from. (YOU being a generalized term) So, you tell a potential Dominant that you do not want to get into any 'legal trouble'. He/she is going ask...what kind of legal trouble? You have just allowed him/her to take YOUR boundary and turn it into a limit. Many experienced Dominants look at these kinds of things. They pay attention to how you word things, how you explain things. Instead of telling someone that 'legal trouble' is a limit; tell them instead that this is a line that will never be crossed. It does not make you less submissive or less of a slave. It does however, make you smart and informed. edited to add: Sometimes, semantics are a good thing. It keeps you from being misunderstood [8D] LMAO...any Dominant worth his salt to me will NOT ask "what kind of legal trouble?" when I mention that limit. Unless, of course, I'm dealing with another attorney, in which case, we usually have a huge laugh about, and say at the end of it all, "yup, not going to go there." No, I don't expect a non-attorney that I am with to understand all of the legal intricacies...but I do expect them to respect the fact that I do NOT want to even remotely go close to it. Seems to me like that's not a huge deal...but, if it is...so be it. I think my standard line is "I will not do anything that might get me in legal trouble". I don't give a hoot whether that's defined as a "limit" or a "boundary"...at the end of the day, it's a line that will not be crossed. Crap, even the slightest misdemeanor fits this bill, as far as I'm concerned. "Experienced Dominants" my tucchus. It's a line that I, as the person that I am, have made, and will not be crossed....no matter the "experience" of the person I am with. There's no "change" there. But, perhaps, as I am thinking about it, this may not be the best example that I could have chosen.... Perhaps it's better to take another one of my "limits" as the case in point. Hmmm....blood letting vs. shit play....let's go with the former. I know that there are a lot of people who dig the "blood letting" thing. And, fine....safe, sane, consensual....it's just not my thing. Needles, knives, anything meant to break skin, I want nothing to do with. One of my limits, straight out of the gate. I have no "vested interest" in the blood issues...except that I don't like it. what's the difference if I express it as a "limit" or a "boundary"? If we're going to spend time together, it won't be doing that...no matter how he "spins it". (And, yes, I appreciate that you "like me"....were it not for that, the fangs would totally have been out. Seriously though, thanks for stating that...it is appreciated.)
|
|
|
|