Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"!

Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

subrosaDom -> Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/25/2014 9:57:42 PM)
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/09/25/obama-praises-moderate-muslim-who-called-for-slaughter-of-us-troops-n1896533 And, this is a pro-American President? Or perhaps this is the "new" definition of moderate. The "extreme" Muslim would have called for the beheading of US Troops, whereas this POS "only" calls for their slaughter.

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 5:51:18 AM)
Yeah. That's it. Very insightful of you. [8\|]

Sanity -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 5:56:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Yeah. That's it. Very insightful of you. [8\|] Leave it to a simple-minded little troll to attack the messenger, and completely ignore the topic Thread after thread after thread A trained seal could do a better job barking at "duh conses" than you "Ark! Ark! Ark!" And look more intelligent doing it.

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 6:03:25 AM)
Trust you to lower the discussion quality even further. Say something substantial, you'll start getting different responses.

Sanity -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 6:03:30 AM)
From the same page you limked to: [img]http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/bg092514dAPC20140925024951.jpg[/img] Hope and change is the empty rhetoric everyone warned that it was (Where is a real cowboy when you need him)

Sanity -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 6:04:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Trust you to lower the discussion quality even further. Say something substantial, you'll start getting different responses. "Ark! Ark! Ark!" The topic. Ever heard of it?

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 6:05:36 AM)
The "real Cowboy" dragged us into this bullshit with naivety and lies. Bush Lite is floundering in the wake. Maverick McCain was too busy trying to game the system to stay on real messages -- but he's the only one who told the truth: We will be in Iraq for at least a couple decades, regardless who is president.

mnottertail -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 8:02:48 AM)
Uh for the simpleminded trolls and nutsuckers (oh, I repeat myself). Townhall is certainly a nutsucker hallucination portal for the feebleminded. Perhaps there is a credible citation that this guy called for the slaughter of american troops? IN DETAIL? because I am betting nutsuckers don't know the definition of fatwa.

thompsonx -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 8:36:58 AM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/09/25/obama-praises-moderate-muslim-who-called-for-slaughter-of-us-troops-n1896533 And, this is a pro-American President? Or perhaps this is the "new" definition of moderate. The "extreme" Muslim would have called for the beheading of US Troops, whereas this POS "only" calls for their slaughter. Would you thought it more logical if he had admonished the afghanie to throw down thier arms and allow the invaders to murder them?

subrosaDom -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 10:56:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Trust you to lower the discussion quality even further. Say something substantial, you'll start getting different responses. Musicmystery, since your posts on matters of bdsm are in fact very insightful and thoughtful, it is clear you are capable of responses of greater depth. So in this case I'd have to say Sanity is on point. The issue is very clear. Really two issues: (1) Another so-called "moderate" Muslim who is in fact an anti-Semite, a terrorist, a misogynist, a sharia-lover. (2) No way POTUS puts him in a speech at the UN without all names having been vetted. So not only Obama, but also Jarrett, Axelrod, the whole mess of them, absolutely had to know. And they kept the reference. Why?

subrosaDom -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 10:59:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery The "real Cowboy" dragged us into this bullshit with naivety and lies. Bush Lite is floundering in the wake. Maverick McCain was too busy trying to game the system to stay on real messages -- but he's the only one who told the truth: We will be in Iraq for at least a couple decades, regardless who is president. Bush initiated the "religion of peace" bullshit. Absolutely true. I think he believed that because he's a devout Christian and believes all people are capable of good. Regardless, he was still dead wrong. Huge mistake. Obama has compounded the problem and he is sympatico with the Muslim Brotherhood. It was only recently that one of their higher ups in Homeland Security was forced to resign, finally, after making anti-American tweets. I don't care whether Obama is a Muslim or not -- he supports the Muslim Brotherhood and all his actions are in accord with their objectives and hatred of America.

subrosaDom -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 11:01:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: subrosaDom http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/09/25/obama-praises-moderate-muslim-who-called-for-slaughter-of-us-troops-n1896533 And, this is a pro-American President? Or perhaps this is the "new" definition of moderate. The "extreme" Muslim would have called for the beheading of US Troops, whereas this POS "only" calls for their slaughter. Would you thought it more logical if he had admonished the afghanie to throw down thier arms and allow the invaders to murder them? That has absolutely nothing to do with the point of the article. You're snarky but usually don't dabble in absolute non sequiturs.

thompsonx -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 11:06:30 AM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom So in this case I'd have to say Sanity is on point. That is only because you are a phoquing moron. The issue is very clear. Really two issues: (1) Another so-called "moderate" Muslim who is in fact an anti-Semite, a terrorist, a misogynist, a sharia-lover. (2) No way POTUS puts him in a speech at the UN without all names having been vetted. So not only Obama, but also Jarrett, Axelrod, the whole mess of them, absolutely had to know. And they kept the reference. Why? If you could read and had more than a single brain cell you might be able to cypher it out. You dont so you cant. Even as a practicing moron you have to ask yourself why would he have said otherwise?

thompsonx -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 11:10:15 AM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom That has absolutely nothing to do with the point of the article. Only to morons like you who think the war in the sandbox was kewel. You're snarky but usually don't dabble in absolute non sequiturs. That would be how they say "you ask questions I am too ignorant to answer" in your zip code.

mnottertail -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 11:20:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrosaDom quote]ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Musicmystery, since your posts on matters of bdsm are in fact very insightful and thoughtful, it is clear you are capable of responses of greater depth. So in this case I'd have to say Sanity is on point. The issue is very clear. Really two issues: (1) Another so-called "moderate" Muslim who is in fact an anti-Semite, a terrorist, a misogynist, a sharia-lover. (2) No way POTUS puts him in a speech at the UN without all names having been vetted. So not only Obama, but also Jarrett, Axelrod, the whole mess of them, absolutely had to know. And they kept the reference. Why? 1. this is not established by credible citation 2. see one A nutsucker site spews nutsuckerism without credible citation, and you ask why? You know why, thats what they do. Its all they got, its all they ever will.

NorthernGent -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 11:37:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrosaDom http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/09/25/obama-praises-moderate-muslim-who-called-for-slaughter-of-us-troops-n1896533 And, this is a pro-American President? Or perhaps this is the "new" definition of moderate. The "extreme" Muslim would have called for the beheading of US Troops, whereas this POS "only" calls for their slaughter. Bin Bayyah himself has long been engulfed in controversy for many of his views, including the reported backing of a 2004 fatwa that advocated violent resistance against Americans fighting in Iraq. who also has served as the vice president of a Muslim scholars group founded by a radical Muslim Brotherhood leader who has called “for the death of Jews and Americans,” according to Fox News and other reports. Additionally, the notorious 2004 fatwa permitting armed resistance against U.S. military personnel in Iraq reportedly stated that “resisting occupation troops” is a “duty” for all Muslims, according to reports about the edict. The above seem to be the pertinent points pertaining to the whole report. Seems to me this bloke is basically saying we need to resist occupiers (hardly earth shattering news and just about every person resists an occupying force in their country in one form or other), and according to Fox News 'and others' he's called for the death of Americans. I don't know much about Fox News but have read the comments on here that they're more than slightly biased. I'll reserve judgement as I've never watched it. But, it seems there's a body of opinion suggesting that Fox News isn't always telling it how it is. If you read Obama's comments and forget all that bollocks about praising people who want Americans dead, and please tell me you or anyone else doesn't really believe that?, then Obama seems like a pretty reasonable bloke with some sound principles. You might not agree with his politics, but he seems pretty reasonable to me and not someone who would ever praise someone openly saying they want Americans dead.

mnottertail -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 11:47:37 AM)
a fatwa simply being a legal opinion or learned interpretation that a qualified jurist or mufti can give on issues pertaining to the Islamic law. Much like Ws 'Mission Accomplished.'

subrosaDom -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 4:22:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: subrosaDom That has absolutely nothing to do with the point of the article. Only to morons like you who think the war in the sandbox was kewel. You're snarky but usually don't dabble in absolute non sequiturs. That would be how they say "you ask questions I am too ignorant to answer" in your zip code. Worry not. I'm adding the title "Moron, according to thompsonx" to my business card. I think it'll be a big talking point.

thompsonx -> RE: Obama UN Speech Praises Muslim Who Called For Slaughter Of US Troops As "Moderate"! (9/26/2014 5:43:14 PM)
ORIGINAL: subrosaDom Worry not. I'm adding the title "Moron, according to thompsonx" to my business card. I think it'll be a big talking point. You are a proctologist? I thought you said you were a chiropractor.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875