Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. - 10/7/2014 11:33:02 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

Oh my sakes. Take off your ideological blinders for two minutes, for the love of all rainbows.

They were not "hate laws." It was societal norms.


That seems a weird way of looking at it to me. For one thing, societal norms can, and do, entrench hate and make it widely acceptable. One of the many advantages is that people can be shitty towards certain other sorts of people without having to feel guilty about it.

For another, an ideology works at its strongest and most effectively when what it claims comes to be seen as as 'just normal, natural, ordinary, and eternally true'. This big win is a win against an ideology that promoted homophobia.

Did you read joether's vitriol?


Pot calling the Kettle BLACK!

You have vitriol down to a science!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Can you imagine replacing republicans/tea party/conservatives with homosexuals/transgendered?


Sure, but that is just an imagination, not the reality we have today. I don't see to many homosexuals and transgendered demanding the American people place boots on the ground in Syria/Iraq. Can you say the same for Republican/Tea Party, conservatives and libertarians?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
It is the same type of othering. He even goes so far as to call 1500 years or so of religious belief and bias with regards to marriage as "evil."


Your going to have us all believe that the Christian religion has been spotless, clean, just, fair, honest, and above all, totally in keeping with God's viewpoints?

Good Luck....

A REAL Christian would admit their religious has done many bad things as well as good ones. That people have used the Holy Bible for great acts of evil, and for great acts of good. That some of the most charismatic of Christians have done evil; while those lacking such external beauty have shown great restraint, compassion, love, and given hope to those that have lost all. The 'Salem Witch Trials' was not one of Christian's better moments in history. Nor how they treated the native population here in America. Or allowing holy men to have sex with little children between closed doors; and then protect them from the very law enforcement trying to bring justice to the wrongs!

And there are moments in which Christians have done tremendous good. Feed the poor, tend to the sick, comfort those in pain. To give help to those suffering all sorts of pains and set backs in life. I don't look at the religion and paint a brush. Its the individuals that make up the religion. How have they done given the Holy Bible?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
I just do not see all of those generations of people as evil. I see them as products of their times.


Yes, demonizing a group of people makes it easier to harm and kill them. That you cant see Christianity objectively really shows WHO wears the blinders in this conversation. Or have you never heard of any abortion clinics getting bombed by Christians whom felt justified in their actions? Or KKK'ers caught for bring harm to blacks by the investigations of law enforcement? An who is often against helping people out with the health problems that the ACA helps provide to ease their suffering (or cure), Alyee?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Remember, it is not tolerating something if you do not have an issue with it in the first. So all of those "evil" people upset about the changes to marriage (and some of them I do not agree with) that are not killing, maiming, and threatening others are actually being fairly tolerant.


Two people are dying of cancer. There lives will expire within a few minutes. In both cases, its a woman. In one case, the husband is allowed to be with the patient in their final minutes. To give love, comfort, and assurances. In the second, the lesbian partner is denied, because she is not considered family. She sits in the waiting room, knowing her love for twenty years, will die alone, in sorrow, without comfort and love. What's wrong with this picture, Aylee? To those supporting DOMA at the federal and state levels? Absolutely nothing. How 'Christian' is it? Its NOT, that's the answer. How fair is it? Its NOT, that's the answer. Is it fair for one US Citizen to have something denied to another?

Marriage is not just a religious term. It has a legal, financial, and society definition to it. What financial reason exists to disbar two consenting adults from forming a relationship based on love, friendship, comfort, and wanting to be with the other? How about Society? Can you raise a non religious reason, why two people, whom desire to be together, are of full control of their minds, and not under duress, can not marry? And, make sure I couldn't turn it around to apply to a 'man and woman' marrying. Why do you think these laws are getting struck down left and right in the states?

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. - 10/8/2014 2:34:38 AM   
SadistDave


Posts: 801
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

As I understand the situation, by declining to hear the anti-GM appeals, the Supreme Court was in effect saying that there were no erroneous matters of law in the ruling that the Appeals Court made, and that therefore there could only be one possible outcome to reviewing the case - to uphold the Appeals Court ruling.

While there may be certain political benefits to the Supreme Court reviewing and making a ruling, in effect, it has made a ruling supporting marriage equality by refusing to review the cases.


Actually, since the Supreme Court refuses to weigh in on the subject, it leaves the whole issue wide open for future bans that may be upheld and found to be 100% Constitutional by a future Supreme Court. It also leaves the issue open to future legal battles. For instance, new laws banning same sex marriage can still be passed and enforced until they are also found unconstitutional OR until they are written in such a way that they will not be struck down.

A future, more conservative Supreme Court could simply reverse the decisions of the lower courts, and every single state ban would be in effect again.

This is more of an idle thought than anything else, but, it could simply be that they've chosen not to take the issue up because 6 or them are Roman Catholics and 3 of them are Jewish. Aside from the churches and synagogues that defy their religious dogma, both religions have a core belief that homosexuality is an unforgivable sin. They may simply feel that they would be unable to rule against their own religious beliefs without compromising them.

-SD-




_____________________________

To whom it may concern: Just because someone is in a position of authority they do not get to make up their own facts. In spite of what some people here (who shall remain nameless) want to claim, someone over the age of 18 is NOT a fucking minor!

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. - 10/8/2014 12:36:22 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
joether -

Thanks for the Cthulhu pic! WOOTELS!

DOMA was a bipartisan passage with a veto proof majority. Lots of democrats voted for it (including Biden). The 104th Congress was fairly evenly split. It was signed into law by a democrat president. You would also do well to remember why Prop 8 failed in California. Hint: it was not the republicans.

As someone who has went through the process of making life and death decisions for someone and as an omnisexual, the gay couple stories drive me nuts. Here is the thing, if you KNOW that your closest living relative has such an intense hatred of homosexuality that they are going to refuse to allow your companion to be with you when you are sick or dying, and you do NOT get a medical power of attorney, then you are an idiot. It is not difficult or expensive. http://www.wikihow.com/Get-Medical-Power-of-Attorney

Because that is the ONLY reason that they will be barred. The closest living relative making the medical decisions is the one that gets to decide who is and is not allowed to visit. (I had no restrictions on visitors for my late husband.)

Kiddie diddling? You realize that children are most likely to be molested at home or school before church, right? Families and schools covered it up for pretty much forever. It was just what was done. That does not make is a good thing. It just is a reflection of the times. I have no use for kiddie diddlers.

People doing bad things all throughout history? Hobbes described that: bellum omnium contra omnes.

Helping people out with health problems? Have you not noticed that the people over in West Africa contracting Ebola by providing medical care are missionaries? Being against the ACA is not the same as being against people receiving health care.

Is it fair for one US Citizen to have something denied to another? Yes.

Why would you think I would burn books? Unless I was really cold and needed to start a fire and I had no other options?

My opinion on marriage? I do not think that I would want to get married again as I do not have a desire to ever make life and death decisions for someone again. Although my companion and I have discussed medical powers of attorney for each other. I do not think that marriage is a right. I do think that anyone over the age of 18 and has not been declared legally incompetent should be allowed to enter into a contract. (Yes, that means that I just included incest and poly. Isn't that big a me!? *could not resist*)

Effects of gay couples raising children? As far as I know we do not have enough cases yet to make a determination. My guess is that when we do have enough the results will be closer to hetero couples and widows than divorced and single.

Homosexuals and trans calling for boots on the ground - my guess would be that the percent would match other demographic percents.

I think that I hit most of your points, but I was doing this from memory.


_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. - 10/8/2014 6:27:57 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

They were not "hate laws." It was societal norms.

Are the two mutually exclusive?

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. - 10/8/2014 7:59:06 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

They were not "hate laws." It was societal norms.

Are the two mutually exclusive?


I just do not think that it derived from hatred. That is very strong emotion. Living in a time and place where something is considered deviant or immoral is not the same as hatred for a group.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. - 10/10/2014 4:24:56 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

I just do not think that it derived from hatred. That is very strong emotion. Living in a time and place where something is considered deviant or immoral is not the same as hatred for a group.


Thats a bit two faced given your views on Muslims, or are the values they have, abhorrent as they are, not allowed the same leeway ?

Is the Bible any more relevant than the Koran ?

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 26
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: A Big Win For Freedom and Equality. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.062