RE: Question for conservatives

RE: Question for conservatives (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/11/2014 6:36:20 PM)
Saying or suggesting one woman has or may have had sexual relations with another isnt a slur, unless youre a homophobic I didnt see it as any kind of bigotry, anyway Where is your faux outrage when your little brother mnot throws out actual gay slurs with every post Hypocrite much

DomKen -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/11/2014 8:42:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Saying or suggesting one woman has or may have had sexual relations with another isnt a slur, unless youre a homophobic It was meant as a slur so I took it as one. It's as simple as that. Anyone who can read can see what he meant. That you feel the need to rush to his defense just confirms it.

Sanity -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/11/2014 9:20:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen It was meant as a slur so I took it as one. It's as simple as that. Anyone who can read can see what he meant. That you feel the need to rush to his defense just confirms it. Not defending him He doesnt want, or need me to defend him Just pointing out how your are wild-eyed and hysterical over nothing, yet silent about something In other words, you that are a hypocrite

thishereboi -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 6:45:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Saying or suggesting one woman has or may have had sexual relations with another isnt a slur, unless youre a homophobic It was meant as a slur so I took it as one. It's as simple as that. Anyone who can read can see what he meant. That you feel the need to rush to his defense just confirms it. Yes they can which might explain why no one has been along to back your bullshit up.

DomKen -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 4:57:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Saying or suggesting one woman has or may have had sexual relations with another isnt a slur, unless youre a homophobic It was meant as a slur so I took it as one. It's as simple as that. Anyone who can read can see what he meant. That you feel the need to rush to his defense just confirms it. Yes they can which might explain why no one has been along to back your bullshit up. And another right winger who exists to derail topics they don't like rushes in to make sure this topic goes no where. That's 4.

MrRodgers -> RE: Question for leftists/socialists/democrats (11/12/2014 5:07:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ElChupa Answer: just another radical leftist who doesn't give a damn about the constitution. Just like her glorious dear leader. Questions for leftist: I have so many. Where do I start? Why did he give up his law license? Why did MooShell give up her law license? Isn't it funny/strange that nobody from Occidental or Columbia remembers this guy? No previous girl friends? This is just a start. It's damn unusual for a president to have no history, no background, no past friends, girlfriends... even the choom gang is silent on this character. But, to quote one of your heroes, what difference does it make? Right? After Ashcroft and Gonzales...who fucking cares ?

thishereboi -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 5:42:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Saying or suggesting one woman has or may have had sexual relations with another isnt a slur, unless youre a homophobic It was meant as a slur so I took it as one. It's as simple as that. Anyone who can read can see what he meant. That you feel the need to rush to his defense just confirms it. Yes they can which might explain why no one has been along to back your bullshit up. And another right winger who exists to derail topics they don't like rushes in to make sure this topic goes no where. That's 4. So sorry but I didn't see a topic. All I saw was a pathetic attempt at trolling. And when I saw who started it, I wasn't a bit surprised.

BamaD -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 5:50:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Saying or suggesting one woman has or may have had sexual relations with another isnt a slur, unless youre a homophobic It was meant as a slur so I took it as one. It's as simple as that. Anyone who can read can see what he meant. That you feel the need to rush to his defense just confirms it. Yes they can which might explain why no one has been along to back your bullshit up. And another right winger who exists to derail topics they don't like rushes in to make sure this topic goes no where. That's 4. So sorry but I didn't see a topic. All I saw was a pathetic attempt at trolling. And when I saw who started it, I wasn't a bit surprised. He diverts the thread to discussing TheHeretic's alleged bigotry then whines about derailment?

TheHeretic -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 8:24:29 PM)
You don't think he's going to talk about Valerie Jarrett, do you? He's MUCH more comfortable insisting that since he has no sense of humor, nobody else catches my funnies either.

Aylee -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 9:21:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen What can you tell me about the background of the President's nominee for Attorney General? Holder appointed Lynch to the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee in 2010, and she has served as Chairman of that committee since 2013.

Kirata -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 9:39:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD He diverts the thread to discussing TheHeretic's alleged bigotry then whines about derailment? I think he's trying for another Golden Shovel award. [:)] K.

BamaD -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/12/2014 10:05:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD He diverts the thread to discussing TheHeretic's alleged bigotry then whines about derailment? I think he's trying for another Golden Shovel award. [:)] K. Doesn't his already have a couple of gold clusters?

DomKen -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/13/2014 6:35:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic You don't think he's going to talk about Valerie Jarrett, do you? He's MUCH more comfortable insisting that since he has no sense of humor, nobody else catches my funnies either. Valerie Jarrett is not the subject of the thread is she? And trying to turn someone's sex life into an insult is not funny and never will be.

Lucylastic -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/13/2014 7:14:56 AM)
obviously the need to jump on Ken for "trolling" far outweighs an actual answer to the question. gold shovels indeed....snorts

Lucylastic -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/13/2014 7:34:18 AM)
Breitbart didnt do as well as those who did respond efficiently http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/uqricc/tip-wag---breitbart

TheHeretic -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/13/2014 9:19:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Valerie Jarrett is not the subject of the thread is she? And trying to turn someone's sex life into an insult is not funny and never will be. Really? Jokes about people's sex lives aren't funny, and never will be? Do you even think about what you are posting? Why do Barack and Michelle always try to have sex on Air Force One - they hate missing an opportunity to fuck over the American people. You got your answer from me, douchebag. Pretending you don't understand it is pretty comical. You being offended by the metaphor I chose to express it is pure gravy.

TheHeretic -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/13/2014 9:26:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic obviously the need to jump on Ken for "trolling" far outweighs an actual answer to the question. gold shovels indeed....snorts Right, Lucy. Because you never accused anyone of trolling... Oh wait. Yes you do. Going for irony, or just expecting not to be called on blatant hypocrisy?

DomKen -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/14/2014 2:52:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Valerie Jarrett is not the subject of the thread is she? And trying to turn someone's sex life into an insult is not funny and never will be. Really? Jokes about people's sex lives aren't funny, and never will be? Do you even think about what you are posting? Why do Barack and Michelle always try to have sex on Air Force One - they hate missing an opportunity to fuck over the American people. You got your answer from me, douchebag. Pretending you don't understand it is pretty comical. You being offended by the metaphor I chose to express it is pure gravy. Schoolyard insults and generic "jokes" that fit any President are really the best you can do? You should drink less and think more. And you didn't use a metaphor you simply expressed your hatred and now can't bring yourself to admit it. It's actually pretty sad.

DomKen -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/14/2014 2:54:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic obviously the need to jump on Ken for "trolling" far outweighs an actual answer to the question. gold shovels indeed....snorts Did you notice how few actual answers I got?

DesideriScuri -> RE: Question for conservatives (11/14/2014 3:00:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic obviously the need to jump on Ken for "trolling" far outweighs an actual answer to the question. gold shovels indeed....snorts Did you notice how few actual answers I got? My post detailed every shred of information I know about her.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875