Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Blue Cross


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Blue Cross Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Blue C... - 11/20/2014 7:09:07 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
A dream vacation has turned into a financial nightmare for one Saskatchewan couple, after a mom-to-be gave birth while on holiday in Hawaii.
Jennifer Huculak and her husband have been saddled with a medical bill of nearly $1 million after she gave birth to her daughter in the U.S.

Jennifer Huculak says she was billed nearly $1 million after unexpectedly giving birth to her daughter in Hawaii.
Huculak was six months pregnant when she flew to Hawaii for a holiday with her husband in October 2013. Before her trip, she bought Blue Cross insurance and received approval from her doctor.
But two days into her trip, Huculak's water broke and she spent the next six weeks on bed rest in a Hawaiian hospital. Her daughter was born nine weeks early and spent two months in intensive care.
While she's grateful that her 11-month-old daughter is now healthy, Huculak and her husband were left with a $950,000 medical bill.
"It makes you sick to your stomach," she told CTV Saskatoon. "Who can pay a million-dollar medical bill? Who can afford that?"
Blue Cross is refusing to pay any of the amount, arguing that Huculak had a pre-existing condition.
In a letter to Huculak, the company noted the following: "Ms. Huculak was diagnosed and treated for a high-risk pregnancy in the six months prior to departure. As Ms. Huculak is currently hospitalized and being treated for this high-risk pregnancy, any expenses incurred are not eligible under the terms of your policy."
But Huculak says that she did not have a high-risk pregnancy, she had a bladder infection which led to bleeding.
"The specialist in Hawaii said that these things just happen. There's nothing that causes them," she said.
Her specialist at home in Saskatchewan has written to Blue Cross, saying that the bladder infection did not lead to Huculak's early labour. But her coverage was still denied.
Huculak is angry because she said the Blue Cross pamphlet had no fine print explaining any rules for pre-existing conditions.
She said the family is now trying to decide if they should fight Blue Cross, declare bankruptcy, or wait and see what happens.
Meanwhile, she hopes that other travellers will learn from their ordeal. "It's a very sad situation to be in and people need to be aware that insurance companies will deny you if they have anything they can go on," she said.


Read more: http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/million-dollar-baby-canadians-handed-1m-bill-after-woman-gives-birth-in-u-s-1.2107020#ixzz3JcZmaPdU

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 7:15:53 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
FR

Fucking deadbeat Canadians expecting free health care here in the US. On the bright side, the kid qualifies for citizenship.

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 7:33:40 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
A dream vacation has turned into a financial nightmare for one Saskatchewan couple, after a mom-to-be gave birth while on holiday in Hawaii.
Jennifer Huculak and her husband have been saddled with a medical bill of nearly $1 million after she gave birth to her daughter in the U.S.
Jennifer Huculak says she was billed nearly $1 million after unexpectedly giving birth to her daughter in Hawaii.
Huculak was six months pregnant when she flew to Hawaii for a holiday with her husband in October 2013. Before her trip, she bought Blue Cross insurance and received approval from her doctor.
But two days into her trip, Huculak's water broke and she spent the next six weeks on bed rest in a Hawaiian hospital. Her daughter was born nine weeks early and spent two months in intensive care.
While she's grateful that her 11-month-old daughter is now healthy, Huculak and her husband were left with a $950,000 medical bill.
"It makes you sick to your stomach," she told CTV Saskatoon. "Who can pay a million-dollar medical bill? Who can afford that?"
Blue Cross is refusing to pay any of the amount, arguing that Huculak had a pre-existing condition.
In a letter to Huculak, the company noted the following: "Ms. Huculak was diagnosed and treated for a high-risk pregnancy in the six months prior to departure. As Ms. Huculak is currently hospitalized and being treated for this high-risk pregnancy, any expenses incurred are not eligible under the terms of your policy."
But Huculak says that she did not have a high-risk pregnancy, she had a bladder infection which led to bleeding.
"The specialist in Hawaii said that these things just happen. There's nothing that causes them," she said.
Her specialist at home in Saskatchewan has written to Blue Cross, saying that the bladder infection did not lead to Huculak's early labour. But her coverage was still denied.
Huculak is angry because she said the Blue Cross pamphlet had no fine print explaining any rules for pre-existing conditions.
She said the family is now trying to decide if they should fight Blue Cross, declare bankruptcy, or wait and see what happens.
Meanwhile, she hopes that other travellers will learn from their ordeal. "It's a very sad situation to be in and people need to be aware that insurance companies will deny you if they have anything they can go on," she said.
Read more: http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/million-dollar-baby-canadians-handed-1m-bill-after-woman-gives-birth-in-u-s-1.2107020#ixzz3JcZmaPdU


That's horrible.

I guess the question I have for Blue Cross, is if it was known prior to her signing up for insurance that she was pregnant? If not, shame on Huculak. If so, I think they're responsible for payment, or at least should be.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 7:39:06 AM   
altoonamaster


Posts: 184
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
thank the president for this

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 7:44:44 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
IF she was six months pregnant at the time of the trip and blue cross stated her pre existing condition was known(the bladder infection/supposed HR pregnacy)) One would THINK that blue cross knew it.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 7:48:45 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: altoonamaster

thank the president for this

Oh really? how so?
Pre existing conditions for americans are not reason to deny healthcare, for insurance companies
Blue Cross Canada is the issue here
Oh and the cost of having bed rest, early delivery and preemie costs.
This is how pre ACA insurancing issues go.... if you got a pre existing condition, you are denied.
Im in no way advocating travelling to the US when pregnant, or without substantial insurance.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to altoonamaster)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 7:51:50 AM   
littleladybug


Posts: 1082
Joined: 5/30/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Huculak is angry because she said the Blue Cross pamphlet had no fine print explaining any rules for pre-existing conditions.


I find this hard to believe, but if it's true, I wonder if this is something that is allowed by law. That is, can Blue Cross, or any other insurance company, legally sell this type of insurance without this disclosure?

While I feel for this woman and her family, part of me is placing the blame on a 6 months pregnant woman who didn't think to even ask when purchasing the insurance. The "insurance issues" in the States are no secret in Canada. Some of the policies sold in Canada cover "pre-existing conditions" and some do not.

The article states that "Kimmel and Huculak said that when they purchased their insurance they spoke with a Blue Cross representative who assured them that they would be covered". Covered for what? An accident, or a premature delivery of their baby?


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 8:00:43 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR

Fucking deadbeat Canadians expecting free health care here in the US. On the bright side, the kid qualifies for citizenship.


That is the confusing part. The NICU care could likely be covered by Medicaid.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 8:40:07 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Blue Cross Canada is the issue here

So what does this have anything to do with the US other than it happened to be where she delivered her baby? Sounds like the issue is with Canadian health insurance laws to me.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 8:44:03 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
isnt that JUST what I said???
you even quoted me
look
quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Blue Cross Canada is the issue here

So what does this have anything to do with the US other than it happened to be where she delivered her baby? Sounds like the issue is with Canadian health insurance laws to me.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 8:52:11 AM   
missiesfavourite


Posts: 53
Joined: 5/31/2011
Status: offline
this would not have happened like that in almost every other civilised country

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 9:11:59 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

isnt that JUST what I said???
you even quoted me
look
quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Blue Cross Canada is the issue here

So what does this have anything to do with the US other than it happened to be where she delivered her baby? Sounds like the issue is with Canadian health insurance laws to me.


Just trying to understand what point you're trying to make, Lucy. I got the impression from your OP that you think the US health care system is somehow at fault as well but I don't see the connection other than the hefty bill for a lot of specialized care.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 9:30:44 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I dont see how much clearer I could have been.

while I have many points,
The cost.
The insurance
the cost
The pre-existing condition denial.
the cost
While im all for any woman living her life to the fullest, while pregnant....and otherwise.... flying wasnt the smartest idea in the book, but I bet she doesnt do it again.
Oh and the cost.
If she had stayed at home, she wouldnt have anything to worry about, except of course her and her childs health.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 9:35:08 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
That was not a smart thing to do, they shouldn't have travelled with her being so far along in her pregnancy.. a flight to Hawaii is a very long flight too and sitting in a plane for anywhere from 12 to 20 hours, even if you aren't pregnant.. Why would anyone want to put their unborn baby under that kind of stress?

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 9:49:38 AM   
KYsissy


Posts: 781
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: missiesfavourite

this would not have happened like that in almost every other civilised country

Are you saying Canada is uncivilised?

_____________________________

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went."
Will Rogers, 1897-1935

(in reply to missiesfavourite)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 10:25:15 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Lucy as usual I will bet there is more to the story.

This

"Ms. Huculak was diagnosed and treated for a high-risk pregnancy in the six months prior to departure"

May be true...if it is then three things.. One... what the hell is she doing on vacation. Two...I will bet the pre-existing condition was discussed..and three...I am not familiar with the Canadian healthcare system but does it not cover citizens outside of the country or at least have a deductible and reimbursement clause?

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 10:41:22 AM   
littleladybug


Posts: 1082
Joined: 5/30/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Oh and the cost.



I've been thinking on this one since you first made your post.

It's known here in the States that "retail" costs on healthcare are way different that costs billed to insurance companies. Blue Cross, if and when they cover something like this, will not pay anywhere NEAR that amount.

My point, and question, is this:

What happens when, say, an uninsured American has something like this happen in Canada? How are the costs figured?

As polite as I know Canadians are, I have no doubt that a bill *will* be sent.

Anyone have any data on this?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 10:42:35 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
No it doesnt, thats why she bought insurance.... tax payer canadian healthcare by and large only covers in country healthcare.

Hey Butch:)

Maybe the guidelines have changed in the past few years but a treated bladder infection doesnt make you high risk pregnancy.
Someone may have a different take on it, but I had my babies over 20 years ago, and things change.
Im pretty sure more will come out about this, so ...I cant tell you anymore right now, than what they article says.
I certainly dont have details of the blue cross insurance plan, altho I do believe that there is fine print about pre existing conditions.

It interested me specifically because I just had orders to cancel any trips to the US without hefty insurance, until I have my upcoming surgery. I was planning two trips down, now I have to cancel them, because I have a bunch of pre existing conditions (hence the surgery) and Im not taking the chance of getting sick while down there. OR getting a huge bill and BC or whoever denying it, because I had a broken collarbone last march. *just as an example*



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 10:47:57 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I am not familiar with the Canadian healthcare system but does it not cover citizens outside of the country or at least have a deductible and reimbursement clause?

Butch

No, you need to buy travel insurance, even if you are traveling to another province.. you are only covered in your province by your provincial health care system.. There are some instances where you can apply beforehand to get approved for medical treatment/surgeries in other provinces/countries but you must wait for your provinces healthcare system approval cuz if you go ahead anyway before getting that its on your dime.. In Canada, the healthcare act (whatever its called) is administered by the province, not the Feds.. so its the provinces that decide what drugs, treatments, surgeries, etc they will cover and what they wont.. and that varies somewhat province to province..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Bl... - 11/20/2014 10:56:48 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
what TJ Said,
This is from the Ontario health care page regarding coverage outside Canada
Services Outside Canada( http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/publications/ohip/services.aspx)

For people travelling outside Canada, the ministry pays a set rate for emergency health services. Emergency health services are those given in connection with an acute, unexpected condition, illness, disease or injury that arises outside Canada and requires immediate treatment. Ambulance services are not covered.

Ontario residents are encouraged to purchase supplementary insurance when traveling outside Canada as many emergency health services provided outside the country cost much more than OHIP may pay.



Little Lady Bug, I know of people that have had no bills, but I think for something major like that, there would be a billing, I dont know off hand, BUT Im gonna have a look see.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Best not travel to the US if Pregnant OR rely on Blue Cross Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109