DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
I suspect that my answer will come as no surprise to you, based upon what you typed. None-the-less ... I think you're right that a "boy-Toy" type arrangement probably lacks a whole lot of emotional entanglement and then, invariably, when one starts getting attached, that's a bad thing, also. I'll take it a step further: I think that in most instances, the one doing the financial supporting is basically engaging in a form of prostitution. That's not really a turn-on for me (even though, like most guys, I wish it could be). However, when we twist the situation a bit, my answer is different. When I was younger, I was so full of bravado and machismo that there was "no way any woman of mine is going to support me !" Now that I'm a bit older, if I were ever in a position to be a father, again and my lady had a well-paying career, I might decide that for the good of not having children raised by strangers and for ease of economic necessity, I might just be a "house husband". This is contingent upon my holding my lady in high regard and actually having a mutually fulfilling emotional relationship. Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|