Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: White House Spending Bill


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: White House Spending Bill Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: White House Spending Bill - 12/16/2014 1:57:20 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Upon the Taliban influencing Afghan. in any military way there was no such group as Al Quada except that which was a loose term used by the CIA meaning 'data base' and only describing the list of men called mujaheddin that fought the Soviets.
Subsequent to kicking out the Soviets, OBL wanted to hit the US, the Taliban did not. OBL obtained 2 men that the Taliban allowed him to recruit and only because they wanted his money.
Then is the only time any group that the CIA could then call 'Al-Quada' was brought into existence as a handy name for our new fear and one established to take the hit for the Cole and 9/11.


The only reason the Taliban were toppled was because they were harboring al Qaeda and wouldn't allow us entry to root out bin Laden. Since we didn't attack Afghanistan and the Taliban to hit them before they hit us, the Afghanistan War isn't a pre-emptive war/strike, no matter what MM might want to spin.


I would agree with you but we didn't need to go that far. All we needed to do was send in the CIA, then an OPS teams and then and only if needed...the marines for extraction. Done deal.

I am of the firm belief that both Afghan. and Iraq were wars for hegemony and profits.

Some will say and I don't disagree...to start to remake the ME first into a chaos and then later, into our image even though circa the 1950's...they already were.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: White House Spending Bill - 12/16/2014 5:52:49 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Hence the reason for deliberation.


There isn't even deliberation going on. Things are being claimed to be rights, without any actual definition of what a right is. There can be no deliberations.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: White House Spending Bill - 12/16/2014 5:54:28 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Upon the Taliban influencing Afghan. in any military way there was no such group as Al Quada except that which was a loose term used by the CIA meaning 'data base' and only describing the list of men called mujaheddin that fought the Soviets.
Subsequent to kicking out the Soviets, OBL wanted to hit the US, the Taliban did not. OBL obtained 2 men that the Taliban allowed him to recruit and only because they wanted his money.
Then is the only time any group that the CIA could then call 'Al-Quada' was brought into existence as a handy name for our new fear and one established to take the hit for the Cole and 9/11.

The only reason the Taliban were toppled was because they were harboring al Qaeda and wouldn't allow us entry to root out bin Laden. Since we didn't attack Afghanistan and the Taliban to hit them before they hit us, the Afghanistan War isn't a pre-emptive war/strike, no matter what MM might want to spin.

I would agree with you but we didn't need to go that far. All we needed to do was send in the CIA, then an OPS teams and then and only if needed...the marines for extraction. Done deal.
I am of the firm belief that both Afghan. and Iraq were wars for hegemony and profits.
Some will say and I don't disagree...to start to remake the ME first into a chaos and then later, into our image even though circa the 1950's...they already were.


Sending in the CIA and an OPS team (and, possibly, the Marines) would still have been an invasion, an act of war, and wouldn't have had UN support.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: White House Spending Bill - 12/16/2014 6:06:19 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Hence the reason for deliberation.


There isn't even deliberation going on. Things are being claimed to be rights, without any actual definition of what a right is. There can be no deliberations.


Have it your way, sparky. Never happened.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 64
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: White House Spending Bill Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078