Zonie63 -> RE: Does this make any difference or.....? (12/20/2014 10:28:45 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub quote:
Sure you can call me on anything you want, How did our discussion get adversarial... All you have to do is search for political arrests in Russia and you will find many... no need for me to list them. Do the same search but use the US and you find politicians arrested...see the difference... My only objection to your post was that you were paralleling political arrests today... not thirty or forty years ago.... I will quote myself below: "In fact all I asked was for you to show what was parallel between the two as you claimed.You were accusing a free society and its leaders of the same injustices as Putin and Russia today." Make note ...I am asking for proof of a parallel in the US to the systematic political persecution in Russia... TODAY. Now there may be...but I do not see it and if you have proof of systematic political arrests in the US OK lets have them. That wasn't how the discussion started, though. I certainly had no intention of becoming adversarial, but I don't believe that we in America are in a very strong position to take a holier-than-thou viewpoint when talking about Russia. Regarding what our government says and does, I said that I take it with a grain of salt, but you interpreted that remark as an outright "accusation against a free society" and calling on me to prove an accusation I never actually made. That's when it started to become adversarial. Your phrase of "accusing a free society" makes it seem like I've committed some horrible blasphemy that must be called out and atoned for. It would seem to me that, no matter if it's in Russia or the US, if someone is arrested and prosecuted, then it's up to the government to actually prove something - and even then, I probably won't be entirely convinced that they're telling the truth. Does that require me to prove that they're lying? No, it just means I'm exercising my choice to not believe what the government says, whether it's our own government or the Russian government. As for "systematic political prosecutions," can that be proven at all? If someone is arrested and prosecuted in the United States, you might argue that they broke some law or did something wrong which would legitimize it and make it seem "non-political." But the Russians could argue the exact same thing. They could say that someone broke the law, that they're a country of laws and people shouldn't resist arrest or cause problems and should just toe the line. The same things that many people here in the US say. Can you prove them wrong?
|
|
|
|