FieryOpal -> RE: Can you tell me.... (12/26/2014 1:48:08 AM)
|
[Brackets mine] quote:
ORIGINAL: NookieNotes Something I like to point out, WHY someone loves humiliation and specific words can make a huge difference in doing it properly. For example: [1] - Does a sub want to be humiliated for something that is true, that they feel ashamed of [2] - Do they want to be humiliated for something they might feel/fear, but know is not true (and know YOU know it is not true) [3] - Do they want to pretend to be someone who is humiliated by those things, to role play [4] - Do they want to be humiliated to help take control over past hurts? These can lead to very different types of play, and the words you choose to use, not to mention whether you are willing to do it. Short of having known somebody very well prior to getting into a humiliation dynamic with her/him, talking about limits and off-limits areas frequently is absolutely necessary. Chances are, your sub isn't going to safe word with you if and when you hit a psychological trigger. Some s-types act as if safe-wording is the same as saying "uncle," when it isn't at all. OP, the fact that you are conscientious about this matter is a good thing. I'll try to be as brief as possible and stick to what I know from my own (limited) personal experiences with a couple of subs (IRT-In Real Time and/or on-line interactions). I might also add that aside from kidding or joking around (which you still need to be careful with anybody in terms of sensitive spots), my initial motivation was to use this as a tool to further solidify the D/s dynamic between my then husband and myself. Otherwise, I was not inclined to go there. If it would have undermined this goal in any fashion, then none of it would have ever transpired. Also, it would be helpful to establish your own personal no-go zones in this regard. Consensuality includes you, and your better judgment. If engaging in this dynamic makes you end up feeling crappy about yourself, then stop doing it. Err on the side of mildness. I have a personal rule that for every demeaning remark or instruction (what I would consider to be demeaning, since your sub may have a totally different perspective on this), I lace it with a counter-balancing mechanism that is either complimentary, affectionate, or indicative of positive reassurance. For example, you may tell yourself it's not swift to ever speak to a female about being "fat" or "worthless," not just because there's no redeeming value in saying such things, but these are high-trigger areas. Rather than impulsively calling anybody a "fat pig" or a "worthless slut," which stirs up rejection (and why would you want to make your sub feel rejected or non-consensually degraded, other than unintentionally if and when discipline/correction is warranted). In other words, temper your words as appropriate, with a ring of truth to them as well. Telling a woman you hardly know she is your "cute little piglet" or "cuddly little cub" or a "sexy, little slut" will come across as lame if you are not convincing. Items 1 and 2 above are tricky. If the humiliation topic is unequivocally untrue, then your attempts will fall flat. For instance, a man who is well-endowed is going to find SPH-Small Penis Humiliation laughable, and so will his partner. Their interactions will feel silly and fakey. Humiliation is only effective when there is an element of truth to it, no matter how remote and/or universal. What you do with that element of truth, is where the Dominant's discretion and sense of responsibility enter in. Make it a routine to ask for feedback or call a time out to discuss thoroughly before causing any potential damage. Ask yourself whether what you do or say will undermine your sub's sense of worth and value. You're the Dominant. You don't do what your sub wants which could negatively impact her/his self-esteem. You tear down to build back up. Analysis without synthesis will leave you with a hundred scattered clock parts which you can't put back together again to make a functioning timepiece anymore. (See Item 4 above) As for Item 3, there are Dominants who use humiliation for their own amusement. A sub friend of mine used to engage with chatroom Dommes who had proclaimed that "Men are pigs" and wanted him to get down on his hands & knees to role play that he was a pig and start oinking. When I asked him why did he want to be humiliated in this way, he told me that he didn't find it humiliating to do as they asked. They wanted to be amused, and he liked how this made them laugh. He even went so far as to start getting into wearing animal costumes as in furry play. In his case, his motivation was not getting humiliated but getting attention by pleasing these women.
|
|
|
|