RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2? - 12/21/2014 6:49:40 PM

kdsub

Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline

Politesub... read HERE.. the actual interview of witness 40... get close to the end and see how the interviewer torn her story apart in front of the Grand Jury... They did their job... the Grand Jury rejected her testimony and that is why McCulloch mentioned it in the interview. If you listened to the interview you would here him also say other witnesses lied. One who said she saw Brown with hands up when shot...even though she would have to have xray vision to see through the building between her and where Brown was shot.

There is nothing here to change anything.... he said why those witnesses were allowed to be interviewed in front of the Grand Jury and for the sake of fairness it was the right thing to do. If he had picked and choose who to present and who not to... imagine the result under the conditions today.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 12/21/2014 7:08:40 PM >

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to Politesub53)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2? - 12/21/2014 10:10:55 PM

CreativeDominant

Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I don't think anyone downplayed it. Why are you so hot to downplay 24,900 peaceful protestors?

Because they didn't advocate death for those sworn to protect us. Why would I bring them up?

Tell you what MM...next time you bring a post to the board that plays up anything someone from the right of center has done that you recognize as being a good thing, I'll do the same thing for something someone from the left has done.

Not a question of playing up -- it's a question of you deliberately misrepresenting something by false extrapolation.

Whatever mental dance you need to do to pretend to justify it.

Anytime anyone someone brings up something bad the left has done, you characterize it as a false representation.

But what's false here? 2 cops died. Fact. They were killed by someone claiming he was inspired by the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner and the calls for "death to cops". Fact. The nan sho shot the cops told people...as related by those people..to follow him on Instagram. Fact.

I'm sorry you don't want to recognize that not all that the left does results in wondrous results but the fact is, not everything does.

(in reply to Musicmystery)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2? - 12/22/2014 8:24:23 AM

Musicmystery

Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

No, not true at at all -- your own "false representation."

If you want to have a real conversation with me, let's talk about real things. If you want to make up both sides of the discussion, then you don't need me to talk with the voices in your head.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2? - 12/22/2014 8:45:13 AM

CreativeDominant

Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

No, not true at at all -- your own "false representation."

If you want to have a real conversation with me, let's talk about real things. If you want to make up both sides of the discussion, then you don't need me to talk with the voices in your head.

I'm waiting for your response that disputes the facts brought up, rather than plaing into your own brand of diversion. Can you cite any source that states that what I said above about the cops being dead, shot to death by someone claiming it was in retribution for the death of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, is not true?

(in reply to Musicmystery)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2? - 12/22/2014 11:32:22 AM

Musicmystery

Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

OK, I see your answer is no, we aren't going to talk about real things.

You cling to your pyscho and paint the rest of the world the color you want.

I'll continue living in a world where there are sensible and moronic people on all sides of every issue.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2? - 12/22/2014 1:56:04 PM

CreativeDominant

Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

OK, I see your answer is no, we aren't going to talk about real things.

You cling to your pyscho and paint the rest of the world the color you want.

I'll continue living in a world where there are sensible and moronic people on all sides of every issue.
[/ququotSeems to me that you're the one seeing colors since you neither want to engage when facts are presented to you or when the post is not following along some carefully constructed line in your head.

I've presented you with facts. You don't like them or you sneer that of course, everyone knows them or that they didn't need to be stated because everyone feels the same or etc..

(in reply to Musicmystery)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: Could there be a Ferguson, Part 2? - 12/22/2014 4:41:00 PM

CreativeDominant

Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

OK, I see your answer is no, we aren't going to talk about real things.

You cling to your pyscho and paint the rest of the world the color you want.

I'll continue living in a world where there are sensible and moronic people on all sides of every issue.

Seems to me that you're the one seeing colors since you neither want to engage when facts are presented to you or when the post is not following along some carefully constructed line in your head.

I've presented you with facts. You don't like them or you sneer that of course, everyone knows them or that they didn't need to be stated because everyone feels the same or etc..