DaddySatyr -> RE: Sex with submissives (4/27/2015 2:45:56 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DerangedUnit I don't see sex as a form of manipulation. like with your first example, to me that seemed like she was trying to comfort you but I wasn't there so that's only based off similar engagements I have seen. I think people get so caught up in 'who looks like they are coming out on top' that they forget you are in a relationship to be with someone else not to make yourself look good. Love isn't about ego. Sea in a relationship is something I see as a must, it is a man's duty just as much as a woman's to please his partner. If he doesnt, it's not a relationship it's self gratification. You will hear people say all the time that they don't need see but talk to them again after they cut and suddenly they are happy, less confrontational, relaxed. Sex, while fun, is akin to eating or sleeping. You can't expect someone to be in a relationship if their needs aren't met. It is a man's duty to ensure the emotional stability of his partner.... or not blame her for being a cunt once he stops ;) I'm pretty sure you're misunderstanding me but first things, first: Do you not believe that there are ladies that use the promise of sex (or the threat of withholding it) to manipulate? Then, not to get too far off base: I didn't say that it wasn't my duty to please my partner. I said that I don't care if I ever have sex, again (knowing I will, at some point). Sex is no longer the goal for me. A stress-free, pleasurable relationship is the goal (and for me, those include sex but, again: NOT the ultimate goal). To me, sex is the ultimate goal of a one-night-stand or a "campaign of pursuit". The ultimate goal of a relationship (again, to me) is to die, very happy. Of course, part of my definition of "happy" is a fulfilling physical relationship with someone(s) I care about. Michael
|
|
|
|