CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: joether quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote:
ORIGINAL: Sanity quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy I was not trying to negate your point. I was just adding some commentary. I hate all elements that target free speech. Clearly the West is part of the problem in the Middle East, and our solutions have not worked well to stabilize the region. The US has been especially incompetent. Leave it to you to take a problem in another country and somehow manage to work in a slam at the US. Is that because a leberal paradise like France still experienced problems with Muslim terrorists? You have to understand that without the US there would be no problems. Even if there is no discernable connection the US must have contributed or there wouldn't be a problem. America is the root of all evil because they haven't stamped out conservatism. Nice that our colleges and universities teach such awesome values these days Here are some of those wonderful courses: Sibling Incest in Theory and Literature (University of Missouri) Aesthetics, Erotics and Ethics (Harvard University, Divinity School) Magic, Witchcraft and Modernity (Columbia University) Film as Literature (University of Arkansas at Little Rock) 50 Shades Trilogy (American University) Find the fascinating description of these courses here: http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/12336/ None of these course are being offered in 2015. Nor were they for the fall class of 2014. This will come as a shock, but many universities and colleges will offer a very wide range of classes on a very wide level of topics. That the topics may sound interesting, the 'guts' of the course could be all together different. That professors are given latitude to offer such courses shows the 1st amendment still works. I had one course back in college: "World War 2". Most of us in the class were expecting debates on numerous battles and how civilian life interacted with it. Nope, the whole class was about stuff that didn't have much to do with battles, famous leaders, or troops. It was bummer. But then most of us went to the same pub and had all the different discussions over beers. That and a few games of 'Axis & Allies'. Well then, let's look at the course...and their descriptions...being offered today: Doin' Time: A History of Black Incarceration This course may also count for the major in Gender, Feminist Studies and Sexuality. This course considers how a system of imprisoning Black men and women has been sustained from colonial times to the present. Beginning with Foucault's Discipline and Punish and Davis's Are Prisons Obsolete?, the course establishes a theoretical grounding upon which to understand early systems of surveillance and confinement. The course surveys institutions, justice systems, and incarcerated men's and women's crimes, punishments, and experiences negotiating what can arguably be termed 21st century re-enslavement. (Oberlin College...4 full credits) http://mobilecatalog.oberlin.edu/#coursedetail ENVS 10: Joy of Garbage What happens to the things we don’t want? This class follows the path of our waste products as they are burnt, decomposed, landfilled, treated, recycled, reused, dumped on minority communities, or shipped abroad. Building on basic chemical and biological principles, and using the scientific method to guide us, this class explores the fates of organic and nonorganic detritus, and searches for sustainable solutions to waste problems. (4 units) (Santa Clara University. Environmental Studies) http://www.scu.edu/cas/ess/courses/ PHIL-180 PHILOSOPHY AND STAR TREK-FALL FOR 2014-2015 FACULTY: WETZEL, LINDA STAR TREK IS VERY PHILOSOPHICAL. WHAT BETTER WAY, THEN, TO DO PHILOSOPHY, BUT TO WATCH STAR TREK, READ PHILOSOPHY AND HASH IT ALL OUT IN CLASS (AND ON BLACKBOARD)? THAT’S THE PLAN. THIS COURSE WILL CENTER ON TOPICS IN METAPHYSICS THAT COME UP AGAIN AND AGAIN IN STAR TREK. IN CONJUNCTION WITH WATCHING STAR TREK, WE WILL READ EXCERPTS FROM THE WRITINGS OF GREAT PHILOSOPHERS, EXTRACT KEY CONCEPTS AND ARGUMENTS AND THEN ANALYZE THOSE ARGUMENTS. QUESTIONS WE WILL WRESTLE WITH INCLUDE: I. IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE? COULD YOU GO BACK AND KILL YOUR GRANDMOTHER? WHAT IS TIME? II. WHAT IS THE RELATION BETWEEN YOUR MIND AND YOUR BRAIN--ARE THEY SEPARATE ITEMS OR IDENTICAL? CAN PERSONS SURVIVE DEATH? COULD A MACHINE SOMEDAY THINK? IS DATA A PERSON? III. WHAT IS A PERSON? MUST YOU HAVE THE SAME BODY TO BE YOU? SAME MEMORIES? WHEN DO WE HAVE ONE PERSON, AND WHEN DO WE HAVE TWO (THINK OF THE EPISODES WHERE PEOPLE "SPLIT" OR "FUSE"). IV. DO YOU HAVE FREE WILL, OR ARE YOU DETERMINED BY THE LAWS OF NATURE TO DO EXACTLY WHAT YOU WIND UP DOING (WHILE BELIEVING YOU HAVE FREE WILL)? OR BOTH? WHAT IS FREEWILL? TEXT: METAPHYSICS: CLASSIC AND CONTEMPORARY READINGS, 2ND ED., ED. BY HOY & OAKLANDER (WADSWORTH, 2005). THREE SHORT PAPERS, AND ONE PRESENTATION OR DEBATE. CREDITS: 3 PREREQUISITES: ONE OF PHIL 010, 020, 098, OR 099. (Georgetown University)
|