LiveSpark -> RE: With out a safe word (1/12/2015 12:55:18 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: needlesandpins quote:
ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant quote:
ORIGINAL: Xmatt I guess that's my fantasy. To actually be under someone's control and to not have an out. Then they could make me do things that I would normally be reluctant to do. Having a hypnotist making you run around and cluck like a chicken is kinda freaky for some people, but when a sadist does it to you, you are consciously aware and will have a feather duster stuck up your ass for his/her amusement. So, if you find a hypnotist making you act like a chicken is not your vision of fun, then what a sadist will do to you would be a personal hell... consider your limitations, because if you present yourself with none, a sadist will make it their mission to find them. Jus sayin yep, that's kind of my point too. all this stuff about calling the police is just not on. if you are not willing to set yourself limits/boundaries because you can't/won't separate fantasy from real life, then you don't get to cry about it to the police. it's like saying that you wanted a rape play scenario, but didn't want to set limits. the other person asks are you sure? you say yes. then you realise that they are going further than it took you to actually cum in your fantasies, so you call the police, and get them in to trouble. hang on though, who's really at fault? needles That's why it's so important to a) define things like rape play, blackmail etc b) have a good long talk about how far things should go. There is a line beyond which rape play becomes rape so I'm uncomfortable with stating point blank that there is no point beyond which the police shouldn't be called. Just because he didn't realize that things couldn't go too far doesn't mean they can't. I'm not sure that the police should be called but I'm also not sure they shouldn't. I think the D-type should make sure there is that discussion. If there isn't the D-type bears some of the responsibility if things go pear shaped
|
|
|
|