littleladybug
Posts: 1082
Joined: 5/30/2013 Status: offline
|
A while back, on *another* site, there was a discussion that was essentially about "what happens if your Master dies?". There was, as I recall, a male sub who came on with an idea that I found quite interesting. (As an aside, I don't think the gender particularly matters in this scenario, I just like being able to speak about "he" or "she" specifically.) He spoke about how appalled he was to hear that people were dealing with the death of their Master without a "safety net" in place. And, no, he wasn't speaking about wills and the like. He was speaking about having another person, specified by the now-deceased Master, who would take over the "duties" of the Master for a period of time...in a way, to bring the slave back to being able to "be on their own". There were people on there who were completely aghast at this suggestion. I'll admit I was as well. But, in thinking about it, why should *I* or anyone else piss on the way this guy, and many others, feel about their relationships? Yup, there is an essence of "Stockholm Syndrome" there. More than that, though, there is a dependency that this submissive feels that he would have in his relationship that would necessitate having someone else there to bring him back into a situation where he could, literally, take care of himself. I fail to see though, absent consent, where this would be an inherently "bad" thing. Is it the "true way"? No. We all fucking know that. Is it "a way"? Yup. And, personally, I give the people who acknowledge the effects, and prepare for them, all of the credit in the world.
|