RE: presidential hopeful again? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 7:08:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LucylasticBoth instances of the letter "o" in Moore were replaced with what appeared to be crosshairs in the handmade sign shown in the photo.


Dont shit yourself too bad

"If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - Barack Obama




Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 7:41:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: LucylasticBoth instances of the letter "o" in Moore were replaced with what appeared to be crosshairs in the handmade sign shown in the photo.


Dont shit yourself too bad

"If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - Barack Obama


oh poor sanity doesnt understand what is part of the link I shared and what I actually added to the post...
quote:

Thank you God!!!!

Shitting myself is the furthest thing im feeling right now, so I have to ask are you projecting again? your stable is looking pretty bad for ahem ...candidates, so you must be.




Sanity -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:26:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Shitting myself is the furthest thing im feeling right now


You were shitting yourself enough that you felt you had to bring it up





slvemike4u -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:29:06 AM)

I'm confused,is the thread about Lucy and her fear or is Sanity derailing a thread in order to make it about another poster ?

Sanity wouldn't do that,would he ?




Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:31:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Shitting myself is the furthest thing im feeling right now


You were shitting yourself enough that you felt you had to bring it up




AND now we get to see you projecting your own rationalization for 90% of your threads?








Sanity -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:31:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I'm confused


Goes without saying




Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:34:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I'm confused,is the thread about Lucy and her fear or is Sanity derailing a thread in order to make it about another poster ?

Sanity wouldn't do that,would he ?

Oh Mike now you have done it...he has gone to get his "victim" outline from the cleaners,
it was a bit beaten up...apparently:)




bounty44 -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:40:42 AM)

from what it seems to me it's that the OP, and others, are taking offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster in the photo (regardless of who originally spoke about them) and that sanity is pointing out that barack Obama is "guilty" of the same devices.

unless the sarah palin photo and the quote about the photo/poster is there for some other reason?




DaddySatyr -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:43:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

from what it seems to me it's that the OP, and others, are taking offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster in the photo (regardless of who originally spoke about them) and that sanity is pointing out that barack Obama is "guilty" of the same devices.

unless the sarah palin photo and the quote about the photo/poster is there for some other reason?



As always, it's about the letter, after the person's name (Plus, Obummer being the "chosen one" and all).



Michael




Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:48:35 AM)

Please state the post where I expressed offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster ???
Sanity has gone past the point of what obama said.
In fact he hasnt mentioned it since.....
now please show my "offense" and where I disputed sanitys "link"





Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 8:50:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

from what it seems to me it's that the OP, and others, are taking offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster in the photo (regardless of who originally spoke about them) and that sanity is pointing out that barack Obama is "guilty" of the same devices.

unless the sarah palin photo and the quote about the photo/poster is there for some other reason?



As always, it's about the letter, after the person's name (Plus, Obummer being the "chosen one" and all).



Michael






oh god another one who claims to understand the thread to make a dig and looks like a twit cos he hasnt got a clue.




BamaD -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:15:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I'm confused,is the thread about Lucy and her fear or is Sanity derailing a thread in order to make it about another poster ?

Sanity wouldn't do that,would he ?

So what you are saying is that liberals are motivated by fear?




bounty44 -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:16:44 AM)

Where sarah palin is maybe (probably?) coming from...

http://clashdaily.com/2015/01/green-beret-sniper-michael-moores-crisco-sweating-waste-space-not-worthy-presence-sniper/#

Mr. Moore-

Good afternoon there sweetheart, I hope this finds you alive and well. You can thank our men and women of the armed forces for that, by the way, and that also includes us “cowardly snipers”. It seems you’ve found time between licking the jelly off your fingers and releasing your grasp of a bear claw to tweet some junk about snipers being cowards.

My buddies and I got a good laugh over the tweet, so I thank you. For a guy worth $50 million dollars, you sure have quite a bit to bitch and cry about. I guess like a moth to flame, you too gravitate towards things that are popular and in the moment — in this case it’s snipers. Too bad for you that your attempt at being relevant via your 70+ year old family experience has failed. It has only made you look dumber than a bag of hammers. Next time you should try something more original than going after snipers for one reason or another…that was so last month.

It’s typical of “men” like you to criticize the intestinal fortitude, focus, discipline and patriotism of a sniper. It must stem from an inferiority complex or something. But hey, it’s okay cupcake. We snipers are thick skinned and the efforts of world class turds such as yourself to portray us in a negative light only makes us laugh. If you and I were in the same room, I’d throw you a smile and gently pat you on the head knowing you’re nothing more than a mouth breathing, Crisco sweating waste of space not even worthy of being in the presence of a sniper. It’s almost funny how people like you preach things like 'acceptance' and 'not passing judgment' or 'labeling people', but then are the first to do so when a person is in some way dissimilar from you.

So tenderfoot, I leave you with this final thought: what if you found yourself in some sort of hostage situation where you were held at knife-point by some crazed person and they were dead set on making an example of you by bleeding you out on Hollywood Blvd in front of the world, and the only way out was with the precision aimed fire of a sniper? Would you want that coward to take the shot? Because knowing how you feel about snipers such as myself and your hatred of firearms, I’d probably drop the mag, roll the bolt and go get a Jack & Coke before helping you out.

Very Respectfully,

Sikes





bounty44 -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:19:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

from what it seems to me it's that the OP, and others, are taking offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster in the photo (regardless of who originally spoke about them) and that sanity is pointing out that barack Obama is "guilty" of the same devices.

unless the sarah palin photo and the quote about the photo/poster is there for some other reason?



As always, it's about the letter, after the person's name (Plus, Obummer being the "chosen one" and all).



Michael






oh god another one who claims to understand the thread to make a dig and looks like a twit cos he hasnt got a clue.


its amazing how quick you are to default to insult mode. if you read again what I wrote, you will see "it seems to me" (which implies room for being corrected) and I also politely asked, what reason there might be then for the post.




Sanity -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:19:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


oh god another one who claims to understand the thread to make a dig and looks like a twit cos he hasnt got a clue.


The twit without a clue would be you

Why did you bring it up if it that mean ol' Sarah Palins poster wasnt victimizing all you poor stupid drooling leftist trolls









Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:24:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

from what it seems to me it's that the OP, and others, are taking offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster in the photo (regardless of who originally spoke about them) and that sanity is pointing out that barack Obama is "guilty" of the same devices.

unless the sarah palin photo and the quote about the photo/poster is there for some other reason?



As always, it's about the letter, after the person's name (Plus, Obummer being the "chosen one" and all).



Michael






oh god another one who claims to understand the thread to make a dig and looks like a twit cos he hasnt got a clue.


its amazing how quick you are to default to insult mode. if you read again what I wrote, you will see "it seems to me" (which implies room for being corrected) and I also politely asked then, what reason there might be then for the post.



when you assume shit I havent done, I tend to play it back in direct proportion to the bullshit.
Im telling you , you dont have a CLUE what it seems, never mind what it actually is.
polite ignorance, is still ignorance.






Sanity -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:28:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

its amazing how quick you are to default to insult mode.


Theyre just trolls, mostly

I hope you arent here for intelligent conversation, her and those who side with her are primarily here to prevent that




Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:37:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


oh god another one who claims to understand the thread to make a dig and looks like a twit cos he hasnt got a clue.


The twit without a clue would be you

Why did you bring it up if it that mean ol' Sarah Palins poster wasnt victimizing all you poor stupid drooling leftist trolls







Well I was going to bring up all the right wing leading morons appearing on media headlines from the week, I went with the most ironic one
Its quite simple, you forget, palin will never affect me outside of my comedy zone, you try to make it about fear and have failed miserably. Not surprisingly.
try again....




bounty44 -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:39:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

from what it seems to me it's that the OP, and others, are taking offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster in the photo (regardless of who originally spoke about them) and that sanity is pointing out that barack Obama is "guilty" of the same devices.

unless the sarah palin photo and the quote about the photo/poster is there for some other reason?



As always, it's about the letter, after the person's name (Plus, Obummer being the "chosen one" and all).



Michael






oh god another one who claims to understand the thread to make a dig and looks like a twit cos he hasnt got a clue.


its amazing how quick you are to default to insult mode. if you read again what I wrote, you will see "it seems to me" (which implies room for being corrected) and I also politely asked then, what reason there might be then for the post.



when you assume shit I havent done, I tend to play it back in direct proportion to the bullshit.
Im telling you , you dont have a CLUE what it seems, never mind what it actually is.
polite ignorance, is still ignorance.





um, leaving room for doubt (or expressing an opinion as opposed to stating a fact), and asking a question is pretty much the exact opposite of assumption.

that said---even if I were "ignorant" you have a choice to be gentle in correcting, or being insulting, but you seem to default to the latter.




Lucylastic -> RE: presidential hopeful again? (1/25/2015 9:53:23 AM)

are you butthurt?
in this forum?
get a thicker skin
When you deserve civility, you will get civility.
quote:

from what it seems to me it's that the OP, and others, are taking offense at the connection between sarah palin and the crosshairs on the poster in the photo (regardless of who originally spoke about them) and that sanity is pointing out that barack Obama is "guilty" of the same devices.

not a question in the whole sentance.
I didnt touch the reason for putting up the thread. I dont need to and I dont need to explain it to you. You may make assumptions, it doesnt mean you are correct.
Was it fear, was it trolling, was it showing contempt for Palin, was it picking one headline from all the other rw morons and the things they do and say while listing themselves as candidates for the presidency.






Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875