D/s = Pain? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


subdelicious -> D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 4:38:06 PM)

i've enjoyed reading the posts and learning from all of you.  i do see a many posts, though, that mention D/s relationships and painful acts. (ex. "needles through nipples")

my question, if you will:

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?

Maybe i just have a lot to learn yet.




BitaTruble -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 4:42:14 PM)

quote:



my question, if you will:

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?



Absolutely. S/m and D/s are mutually exclusive though they can hold hands very well for those that wish to join them together.

Celeste




KnightofMists -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 4:44:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subdelicious

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?

Maybe i just have a lot to learn yet.


Yes.......

and we all do!




ScooterTrash -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 4:48:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

quote:



my question, if you will:

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?



Absolutely. S/m and D/s are mutually exclusive though they can hold hands very well for those that wish to join them together.

Celeste
Couldn't have put it better myself.




LadiesBladewing -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 4:50:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subdelicious

i've enjoyed reading the posts and learning from all of you.  i do see a many posts, though, that mention D/s relationships and painful acts. (ex. "needles through nipples")

my question, if you will:

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?

Maybe i just have a lot to learn yet.


Pain has almost no place in the way we do D/s. We have occasional individuals whom we reward with some form of pain-play, but it is not in the context of the type of D/s that we do... it is more an individual reward, like some are rewarded with chocolate, others with access to our library. Likewise, though there are incidents of humiliation and other types of activities that are oriented towards sensation of mind or body, most of what we deal with is much more... etherial, I'd say -- it is about the yielding of the spirit and the offering up of the person, rather than individual acts.

We are service oriented, and strive for the expansion of the person through deep yielding to the process of submission. For us, the service is primary, and everything else is strictly individual. In direct answer to the OP's question -- yes, for us, D/s can survive perfectly well without pain play, though only for individuals who share our idea of what D/s success means.

ZWD




ravn -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 5:00:57 PM)

pain is a personal preference.
D/s is about a power dynamic, ::power:: and not ::pain::
D/s and S&M go well together, it's true, but yeah, it's nice to have some nights where i'm merely curled up at Master's feet. [:)]




TemptingNviceSub -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 7:11:04 PM)

D/s is whatever the two decide it is, in THEIR particular relationship...Tempting




Sasy -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 7:25:12 PM)

I agree D/s and S/M Dont have to  go  hand in hand




feastie -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 8:41:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subdelicious

i've enjoyed reading the posts and learning from all of you.  i do see a many posts, though, that mention D/s relationships and painful acts. (ex. "needles through nipples")

my question, if you will:

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?

Maybe i just have a lot to learn yet.


Yes, a D/s relationship can be successful without pain.  It can be successful without BDSM at all, if the people involved so choose.  It's what fits you best.




FangsNfeet -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 9:44:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subdelicious

my question, if you will:

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?


Ofcourse it can work. It just wouldn't be as much fun for me. However, in just D/s, decisions and using the word "No" can be painful at times and may cause the submissive to pout. 




CrappyDom -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 11:25:55 PM)

Its a menu, order only what you want.




NastyDaddy -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/14/2006 11:38:02 PM)

You can have your Shirley Temple with or without extra sugar... any way you want, it's your's. 





EvilGeoff -> RE: D/s = Pain? (7/15/2006 12:46:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subdelicious

Can a D/s relationship be successful without the painful play?

Maybe i just have a lot to learn yet.


Sure it can.

But then again, I'm a sadist.  What would be the point?

*WEG*
YIK,
- Geoff




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125