RE: Hillary's E-Mails

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Hillary's E-Mails

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary's E-Mails

Page: << < prev 23 24 [25] 26 27 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 7:01:31 AM

DaddySatyr

Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/04/296283-adorable-young-toddler-tears-finds-running-president/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Humor

I'd vote for Zeke

I heard this, yesterday, on the radio. When it was over, the DJ said:

"That was Vice President Joe Biden, after hearing that Hillary had announced"

I almost drove the car into a telephone pole, laughing my ass off.

Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to KenDckey)

Post #: 481

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 7:02:26 AM

tweakabelle

Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/04/296283-adorable-young-toddler-tears-finds-running-president/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Humor

I'd vote for Zeke

Not such a bad idea. Little Zeke manages to capture perfectly the levels of sophistication and maturity that characterise your posts and perspectives. I've no doubt that a meeting of his little mind and yours would be a meeting of equals. The two of you could immediately set about removing the petty childish traits that dominate so much of political discourse these days, a matter that preoccupies you greatly if your posts are anything to go by.

So, all up he could be a perfect representative of your political 'thinking' and position.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 4/15/2015 7:03:31 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to KenDckey)

Post #: 482

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 7:17:25 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

sanity, I actually read about that poster when I was looking at ken's most recent link.

the story behind it is here:

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/04/296124-street-artists-hit-time-hillary-square-crosshairs/

turns out theres a group called "Hillary Super Volunteers" and they have created a list of words they deem as "coded sexism" when used in reference to Hillary. "secretive" (believe it or not) is one of them.

quote:

New York Times reporter Amy Chozick outed the ‘sexism’ hit squad:

A group called HRC Super Volunteers just warned me "We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism…" (1/2)

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

2/2 Sexist words, they say, include "polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident…"

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

Also sexist, according to HRC Super Volunteers: "Secretive" and "will do anything to win, represents the past, out of touch…"

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

"You are on notice that we will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism…" the email reads.

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 483

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 7:36:16 AM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

how incredibly ironic the premise of your post is, and your use of the word "childish" is, when the whole of your post is essentially "behavior unbecoming an adult."

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Post #: 484

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 7:46:26 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

sanity, I actually read about that poster when I was looking at ken's most recent link.

the story behind it is here:

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/04/296124-street-artists-hit-time-hillary-square-crosshairs/

turns out theres a group called "Hillary Super Volunteers" and they have created a list of words they deem as "coded sexism" when used in reference to Hillary. "secretive" (believe it or not) is one of them.

quote:

New York Times reporter Amy Chozick outed the ‘sexism’ hit squad:

A group called HRC Super Volunteers just warned me "We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism…" (1/2)

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

2/2 Sexist words, they say, include "polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident…"

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

Also sexist, according to HRC Super Volunteers: "Secretive" and "will do anything to win, represents the past, out of touch…"

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

"You are on notice that we will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism…" the email reads.

— Amy Chozick (@amychozick) March 25, 2015

The thought police have political motives

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to bounty44)

Post #: 485

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 9:10:38 AM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

LOL Zeke is a cutie. LOL Love what kids say.

He, at least to me, shows what many of the dems do when the left doesn't get its way

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 486

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 9:31:35 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Except he is a tool of the right, exactly as you are a fucking tool.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to KenDckey)

Post #: 487

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 9:34:25 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Except he is a tool of the right, exactly as you are a fucking tool.

Leftists seem to be wound awfully tight these days

< Message edited by Sanity -- 4/15/2015 9:45:26 AM >

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 488

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 9:36:57 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Nah, they are laughing at the rightwing shiteating goons and thugs as they always do.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 489

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 9:39:09 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nah, they are laughing at the rightwing shiteating goons and thugs as they always do.

Sure, giggling and laughing like little girls on every one of these threads...

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 490

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 10:15:19 AM

Moderator3

Posts: 3289
Status: offline

Is this the Hillary's E-Mails thread or the go for the one you don't like or agree with thread?

We all know you all disagree and I'm sure that challenging one another to duels can be fun, but it gets a little old for others. More topic please. Challenge what someone says, you can even be feisty, but attacking/challenging just because you disagree wasn't what this section was created for. We wanted to allow more so that you all could be adults and political debate does cause disputes, but topics were not meant to be done away with.

Are people proving that adults talking politics or religion need to be monitored, moderated and banned because they cannot work a topic without going so far we have to reconsider what we want for the forum?

You don't have to hold hands and sing campfire songs, but really, personal wars, especially the same personal wars, need to be tempered. Block, ignore, move on, whatever you have to do to make sure your issues don't become the issues of others. The forum isn't going to be changed. You have Current Affairs and The Dungeon. Please figure it out.

_____________________________

FAST REPLY

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 491

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 10:41:10 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Is that directed at me?

I am not going after anyone, just making a casual observation that the people on the left seem awfully sour today, or wound awfully tight. Not meant as an attack in any way.

Is casual banter no longer allowed here?

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Moderator3)

Post #: 492

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 10:43:24 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nah, they are laughing at the rightwing shiteating goons and thugs as they always do.

Sure, giggling and laughing like little girls on every one of these threads...

And this was meant as light sarcasm, nothing hateful of personal.

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 493

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 10:52:29 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

What else is there to do, its all conspiracy, slobbering, factlessness, foolishness and buffoonery from the idiots and thugs and goons on the right.

So far not one fact is addressed and any implications of those facts from the right.

We have 7 investigations among them the house intel and house armed services committees that say nothing wrong occurred (and they were republican majorities). Its like the 58 repeals of Obamacare, and it cannot be done, and when there are 55 investigations nothing will be found.

Yet not one investigation of the violation of the Logan Act by 47 Senators. Something that means something.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 494

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 12:23:16 PM

KenDckey

Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

Otter It is ok to disagree with people but to continually use slurs lessens your voice. If you have facts about "goons" go to the district attorney. If there are thugs and you have proof go to the district attorney. But please stop the slurs.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 495

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 12:32:35 PM

Moderator3

Posts: 3289
Status: offline

Good god save me.

I work a lot of hours and that is nobodies problem but my own, but when I miss a friggin FR and people take it personally, it tends to be a problem. I hear about it on threads, in email and people madly try to get me to go to fet to hear about it there too.

NO. Just that simple.

I do not like one of you better than another. If at a moment like this, I was asked, I would say I don't like anyone or anything.

I am speaking to every single person on this thread that has taken a topic and made it a slam dunk of someone else simply because they always do and then the debate and people involved become the topic. I know you all know that over used rule well. Lets not go there.

We do still have topics and you can freely mention other topics and get feisty, but you cannot make a topic a feud between forum members... just asking a simple question that becomes the topic.

In general if it applies to you, really applies, then I could mean you. If anyone is having a hard time understanding that one and I am not clear enough, feel free to cmail me and when I get some time, I just might answer.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Is that directed at me?

I am not going after anyone, just making a casual observation that the people on the left seem awfully sour today, or wound awfully tight. Not meant as an attack in any way.

Is casual banter no longer allowed here?

_____________________________

FAST REPLY

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 496

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 12:45:18 PM

ExiledTyrant

Posts: 4547
Joined: 12/9/2013
From: Exiled
Status: offline

Executions?

It seems the only way.

Jus sayin

_____________________________

Gnothi Seauton
To lead, first follow: Aurelius, Epictetus, Descartes, Sun Tzu, to name a few.

Semper fidelis (which sometimes feels like a burden)

(in reply to Moderator3)

Post #: 497

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 12:46:11 PM

Aylee

Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/04/296283-adorable-young-toddler-tears-finds-running-president/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Humor

I'd vote for Zeke

Not such a bad idea. Little Zeke manages to capture perfectly the levels of sophistication and maturity that characterise your posts and perspectives. I've no doubt that a meeting of his little mind and yours would be a meeting of equals. The two of you could immediately set about removing the petty childish traits that dominate so much of political discourse these days, a matter that preoccupies you greatly if your posts are anything to go by.

So, all up he could be a perfect representative of your political 'thinking' and position.

RENOUNCE THE BAD MAN, AND HIS UNUTTERABLE BADNESS! HE IS FILTH! HE IS UNTOUCHABLE! THERE ARE BAD THINGS FLYING OUT OF HIS BAD FINGERS AND INTO HIS BAD KEYBOARD! JOIN WITH ALL THE TRIBE IN POINTING YOUR FINGER — SUTHERLAND-STYLE — YOUR MOUTH GAPING, AND AN UNHOLY SHRIEK ISSUING FROM YOUR THROAT! EEEAAAAAAUGHHHHOOUGHHHHHHHHH . . . .

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Post #: 498

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 1:06:51 PM

Moderator3

Posts: 3289
Status: offline

FR

Unaware of the fact that a number of my posts have followed a Sanity post, I must say, that for that I am sorry. I didn't see it as that and how it could be seen or perceived.

I am tired of the this member and that member battle that continues and THAT is what I am addressing here.

Knock it off, all of you.

Better?

_____________________________

FAST REPLY

(in reply to Aylee)

Post #: 499

RE: Hillary's E-Mails - 4/15/2015 1:08:59 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

Otter It is ok to disagree with people but to continually use slurs lessens your voice. If you have facts about "goons" go to the district attorney. If there are thugs and you have proof go to the district attorney. But please stop the slurs.

Ja, I will give this every consideration it deserves.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to KenDckey)

Post #: 500

Page: << < prev 23 24 [25] 26 27 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary's E-Mails

Page: << < prev 23 24 [25] 26 27 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.094