Marc2b
Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ALL terms for Amerindians/aboriginals were derogatory for much of the N. American history. I seriously doubt any of them felt White Man was an accolade? Even terms that seem neutral now in text (Like tribe names) were mostly pronounced as insults or disrespect. I'm regularly called Haole now. (Or fuckin' Haole.) Hawaiian for stranger or white people. It means 'one without breath' literally. As pronounced and used most often, white equivalent of the N word. Context is everything! Well obviously any term can be made to sound contemptuous if you say it with a contemptuous tone. So what? The term in question is derogatory in and of itself and doesn't need a contemptuous tone to make it so. quote:
As the DC team wasn't named the Losers, or the Giveups, I'll guess the name was intended to relate to the warrior prowess and fierce sporting attitudes of the original inhabitants of the continent. (Lacrosse was pretty much combat with dull tools) Much like Eagles and Bears are names to evoke the strength and awe inspiring capabilities of those animals. Such An Insult! Unforgivable disrespect! Bullshit. In as much as the various tribes and members seem split on Redskins, I'll pass on the general outrage. About as relevant to reality as 'cis', just people finding ways to make their circle (jerk) superior to others. If the offended were actually Doing something for the remnants of the original tribes, I'd maybe listen. Like education or helping with sobriety programs. Or buying reservation cigarettes? Losing money at casinos . . . None of the above is relevant to the issue. The fact that people comment on one issue doesn't mean they don't have opinions on other issues or don't work to alleviate some of the world's suffering. Since no one can solve all of the worlds problems (Sure, you may feed starving children but what have you done to combat animal cruelty . . . you monster!) pointing out other problems in society - even worse ones - is merely another diversionary tactic. There are only two relevant questions in this debate. Is the term derogatory? Should the name of the team(s) be changed? As far as I am concerned, the answer to both questions is yes. I have yet to see any convincing counter argument. quote:
The outrage about 'Buffalo' is a Daily Show put on, right? Satire about the Redskin debacle? It isn't even an Indian language name for the animal, which is a Portuguese derivation used by Whites. And never meant individuals or tribes of aboriginals. How can people suffer disrespect that is actually admiration and aimed at an animal, not a ethnic or social group? I'm sure Jon Stewart will explain it clearly to me soon, when his joke is over. I have no idea. It doesn't matter though because, for the purposes of this thread, the OP is using it as a diversionary tactic.
_____________________________
Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!
|