Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: More Racism....


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: More Racism.... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: More Racism.... - 3/7/2015 10:48:32 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You missed the point, it was a joke. Remember there are many who find the use of Indian names anything but insulting. For example, the Seminole tribe defended Fl States name. But if anyone anywhere considers it offensive it must be banned eventually we will find that everyone is offended by something.



This is where I like to post the Stephen Fry quote/meme. For those that don't know: Mr. Fry is an extremely talented, funny, gay man.



Michael




Exactly. I remember my drill sergeant telling us a lonnnng time ago..."you have every right to be offended about something. You have no right to force others to feel the same as you do."


< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 3/7/2015 11:21:59 PM >

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 12:28:05 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Much as your illness evokes my sympathy, you accrue no advantage by parading it in public. Next time you discover that mommy isn't looking, be a good fellow and stay in the basement anyway.


Pointing out your bullshit is not an illness - it is a talent though I'll grant not a very remarkable one since your bullshit is so obvious. You can try and deflect with snark all you want, the fact remains that this thread is nothing more that a whine about being called out for your defense of a racist term for a team name - and your inability to defend its usage.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 12:42:34 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

You missed the point, it was a joke. Remember there are many who find the use of Indian names anything but insulting. For example, the Seminole tribe defended Fl States name.


"Seminole" is not a derogatory term - just like "Celtic" is not a derogatory term (even if the basketball team mispronounces it). Unless you can find a team with a name that is blatantly derogatory, the attempt at equivalency fails. Even if you did find a another obviously derogatory team name (and given the general assholishness of the human race, I'm sure there is one out there, somewhere) it still wouldn't justify the former. It would simply mean that there is yet another group of people who are mean spirited and/or stupid.

quote:

But if anyone anywhere considers it offensive it must be banned eventually we will find that everyone is offended by something.


No it doesn't. This is another deflection. The fact that everyone is offended by something (well . . .duh) is irrelevant to the controversy surrounding the Washington team. The name of the Washington team is roundly criticized not because anyone, or even a few, find it offensive - it is under attack because a great many people find it offensive.




_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 1:58:28 AM   
epiphiny43


Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline
ALL terms for Amerindians/aboriginals were derogatory for much of the N. American history. I seriously doubt any of them felt White Man was an accolade? Even terms that seem neutral now in text (Like tribe names) were mostly pronounced as insults or disrespect.
I'm regularly called Haole now. (Or fuckin' Haole.) Hawaiian for stranger or white people. It means 'one without breath' literally. As pronounced and used most often, white equivalent of the N word. Context is everything!
As the DC team wasn't named the Losers, or the Giveups, I'll guess the name was intended to relate to the warrior prowess and fierce sporting attitudes of the original inhabitants of the continent. (Lacrosse was pretty much combat with dull tools) Much like Eagles and Bears are names to evoke the strength and awe inspiring capabilities of those animals. Such An Insult! Unforgivable disrespect! Bullshit.
In as much as the various tribes and members seem split on Redskins, I'll pass on the general outrage. About as relevant to reality as 'cis', just people finding ways to make their circle (jerk) superior to others. If the offended were actually Doing something for the remnants of the original tribes, I'd maybe listen. Like education or helping with sobriety programs. Or buying reservation cigarettes? Losing money at casinos . . .

The outrage about 'Buffalo' is a Daily Show put on, right? Satire about the Redskin debacle? It isn't even an Indian language name for the animal, which is a Portuguese derivation used by Whites. And never meant individuals or tribes of aboriginals. How can people suffer disrespect that is actually admiration and aimed at an animal, not a ethnic or social group?
I'm sure Jon Stewart will explain it clearly to me soon, when his joke is over.

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 5:08:23 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ALL terms for Amerindians/aboriginals were derogatory for much of the N. American history. I seriously doubt any of them felt White Man was an accolade? Even terms that seem neutral now in text (Like tribe names) were mostly pronounced as insults or disrespect.
I'm regularly called Haole now. (Or fuckin' Haole.) Hawaiian for stranger or white people. It means 'one without breath' literally. As pronounced and used most often, white equivalent of the N word. Context is everything!


Well obviously any term can be made to sound contemptuous if you say it with a contemptuous tone. So what? The term in question is derogatory in and of itself and doesn't need a contemptuous tone to make it so.

quote:

As the DC team wasn't named the Losers, or the Giveups, I'll guess the name was intended to relate to the warrior prowess and fierce sporting attitudes of the original inhabitants of the continent. (Lacrosse was pretty much combat with dull tools) Much like Eagles and Bears are names to evoke the strength and awe inspiring capabilities of those animals. Such An Insult! Unforgivable disrespect! Bullshit.
In as much as the various tribes and members seem split on Redskins, I'll pass on the general outrage. About as relevant to reality as 'cis', just people finding ways to make their circle (jerk) superior to others. If the offended were actually Doing something for the remnants of the original tribes, I'd maybe listen. Like education or helping with sobriety programs. Or buying reservation cigarettes? Losing money at casinos . . .


None of the above is relevant to the issue. The fact that people comment on one issue doesn't mean they don't have opinions on other issues or don't work to alleviate some of the world's suffering. Since no one can solve all of the worlds problems (Sure, you may feed starving children but what have you done to combat animal cruelty . . . you monster!) pointing out other problems in society - even worse ones - is merely another diversionary tactic.

There are only two relevant questions in this debate. Is the term derogatory? Should the name of the team(s) be changed? As far as I am concerned, the answer to both questions is yes. I have yet to see any convincing counter argument.

quote:

The outrage about 'Buffalo' is a Daily Show put on, right? Satire about the Redskin debacle? It isn't even an Indian language name for the animal, which is a Portuguese derivation used by Whites. And never meant individuals or tribes of aboriginals. How can people suffer disrespect that is actually admiration and aimed at an animal, not a ethnic or social group?
I'm sure Jon Stewart will explain it clearly to me soon, when his joke is over.


I have no idea. It doesn't matter though because, for the purposes of this thread, the OP is using it as a diversionary tactic.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to epiphiny43)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 5:33:32 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Fast response

Its a petition from one bloke on a single petition site, not "they", or "them", or any recognised group. good gawd
yes its a bait, yes its snark and bullshit, so people get annoyed, LMAO it worked perfectly.
But
the Stephen Fry meme.....dragged up by people who put others on hide because they cant control themselves, I think is hysterical




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 6:14:33 AM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
Thinking of the preamble to the U.S. Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

.... can't find a clause in the body mandating freedom from feeling offended.

The worst thing about trying to be politically correct is you can't call them idiot when they blither.


(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 6:29:11 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Thinking of the preamble to the U.S. Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

.... can't find a clause in the body mandating freedom from feeling offended.


But there is a part about freedom of speech.

quote:

The worst thing about trying to be politically correct is you can't call them idiot when they blither.


Fuck political correctness. I oppose the name simply because it is wrong to use obviously derogatory terms as team names. I oppose it simply as a matter of respect. As for those individuals who get all bent out of shape over that - fuck those idiots.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 7:16:11 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

You missed the point, it was a joke. Remember there are many who find the use of Indian names anything but insulting. For example, the Seminole tribe defended Fl States name.


"Seminole" is not a derogatory term - just like "Celtic" is not a derogatory term (even if the basketball team mispronounces it). Unless you can find a team with a name that is blatantly derogatory, the attempt at equivalency fails. Even if you did find a another obviously derogatory team name (and given the general assholishness of the human race, I'm sure there is one out there, somewhere) it still wouldn't justify the former. It would simply mean that there is yet another group of people who are mean spirited and/or stupid.

quote:

But if anyone anywhere considers it offensive it must be banned eventually we will find that everyone is offended by something.


No it doesn't. This is another deflection. The fact that everyone is offended by something (well . . .duh) is irrelevant to the controversy surrounding the Washington team. The name of the Washington team is roundly criticized not because anyone, or even a few, find it offensive - it is under attack because a great many people find it offensive.




But that didn't keep FL State from being taken to court to force them to change their name.
You don't have a very good memory, the Atalanta Braves and the KC Chiefs were attacked because any use of any reference to Indians was "derogatory". You also forget that this started out because some moron decided that the word Buffalo was "derogatory". I find the name Redskins offensive, but I find most things about that organization offensive. Actually you have it backwards, even if the Redskins name is offensive it doesn't mean that people don't go out of their way to be offended and expect everyone to comply. Eventually every place will be named blandsville.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 7:31:13 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
Just an FYI....

Its not really 'Freedom of Speech' for someone to demand an issue in court that something is offensive to them on a racial level. Its the 5th part of the 1st amendment they are using:

...and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It would be a freedom of speech issue if someone was trying to silence or censor them.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 8:11:31 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Just an FYI....

Its not really 'Freedom of Speech' for someone to demand an issue in court that something is offensive to them on a racial level. Its the 5th part of the 1st amendment they are using:

...and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It would be a freedom of speech issue if someone was trying to silence or censor them.

Just an FYI, I didn't say is was a freedom of speech issue.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 8:40:39 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

But that didn't keep FL State from being taken to court to force them to change their name.
You don't have a very good memory, the Atalanta Braves and the KC Chiefs were attacked because any use of any reference to Indians was "derogatory".


So what? What does that have to do with the team in Washington?

quote:

You also forget that this started out because some moron decided that the word Buffalo was "derogatory".


This what? This thread? No. This thread got started because the OP accepts the false equivalency between the real issue and the manufactured one. Since I am a firm believer in freedom of speech I don't have a problem with the OP blathering about it. But that doesn't change the fact that he - and others - are not really making an argument but a merely engaging in rhetorical sleight of hand.

quote:

I find the name Redskins offensive, but I find most things about that organization offensive. Actually you have it backwards, even if the Redskins name is offensive it doesn't mean that people don't go out of their way to be offended and expect everyone to comply.


People have been going out of their way to be offended by something since the human race began flapping its lips - and will continue to do so as long as the race endures. That's why pointing it out is an irrelevant diversion. The question remains whether this particular term should be abided.

quote:

Eventually every place will be named blandsville.


No. Not really. There is no slippery slope in this situation.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 8:46:28 AM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
I rather think we have already slid down the slippery slope where over-thought skewed perceptions of a minority make for hardships for the majority.
The interpretation of symbols and names is a cultural thing.

< Message edited by MercTech -- 3/8/2015 8:47:47 AM >

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 8:50:14 AM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline

An example of cultural symbolism variance... what do you see?

http://traditionscustoms.com/religion/semana-santa






Attachment (1)

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 8:50:42 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Just an FYI....

Its not really 'Freedom of Speech' for someone to demand an issue in court that something is offensive to them on a racial level. Its the 5th part of the 1st amendment they are using:

...and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It would be a freedom of speech issue if someone was trying to silence or censor them.


I'm going to presume that this was meant for me.

Freedom of speech is a necessary prelude to petitioning the government for a redress of grievances. That aside, my point to MercTech was that freedom of speech allows people to voice their opinion about something that offends them. If that bothers some people . . . well . . .they can always make use of their own freedom of speech to respond. And I in turn can use my freedom of speech to call bullshit on that response when it doesn't really address the issue at hand but serves only as a diversion from the actual issue.


_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 8:52:52 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I rather think we have already slid down the slippery slope where over-thought skewed perceptions of a minority make for hardships for the majority.
The interpretation of symbols and names is a cultural thing.


Yes. And the name of the Washington team is considered offensive by many in our culture.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 8:56:26 AM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline

quote:


An example of cultural symbolism variance... what do you see?

http://traditionscustoms.com/religion/semana-santa







Yeah, I saw that movie too.

The question at hand concerns our culture - not Spain's.


_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 9:05:18 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

But that didn't keep FL State from being taken to court to force them to change their name.
You don't have a very good memory, the Atalanta Braves and the KC Chiefs were attacked because any use of any reference to Indians was "derogatory".


So what? What does that have to do with the team in Washington?

quote:

You also forget that this started out because some moron decided that the word Buffalo was "derogatory".


This what? This thread? No. This thread got started because the OP accepts the false equivalency between the real issue and the manufactured one. Since I am a firm believer in freedom of speech I don't have a problem with the OP blathering about it. But that doesn't change the fact that he - and others - are not really making an argument but a merely engaging in rhetorical sleight of hand.

quote:

I find the name Redskins offensive, but I find most things about that organization offensive. Actually you have it backwards, even if the Redskins name is offensive it doesn't mean that people don't go out of their way to be offended and expect everyone to comply.


People have been going out of their way to be offended by something since the human race began flapping its lips - and will continue to do so as long as the race endures. That's why pointing it out is an irrelevant diversion. The question remains whether this particular term should be abided.

quote:

Eventually every place will be named blandsville.


No. Not really. There is no slippery slope in this situation.

They have been attacking every team with Indian names for years. It is just that they have gotten traction with the Redskins, to pretend that it is only the Redskins because their name is in bad taste does not change this fact. When an Alaskan team was taken to court because their name was the Aleuts, the case fell apart when the team showed up in court and the vasts majority of them actually were Aleuts. There has been case after case like this, the Redskins are only the most recent. I think they should change their name, but I don't think they should be forced to. The Redskins fans can vote with their dollars for the change.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 9:34:16 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

Pointing out your bullshit is not an illness - it is a talent though I'll grant not a very remarkable one since your bullshit is so obvious. You can try and deflect with snark all you want, the fact remains that this thread is nothing more that a whine about being called out for your defense of a racist term for a team name - and your inability to defend its usage.

The only thing more ridiculous than your pretension to superpowers is your confidence in them. Moreover, your opinion of the term is not shared by everyone, even among Native Americans, and a U.S District Court has already ruled that a claim of "disparagement is not supported by substantial evidence.” The word is nothing more or less than the descriptive partner of "paleface," and both terms entered English as translations of words that are Native American in origin and usage. That you find mentioning these facts to be offensive in itself serves only to confirm the disregard for reality that informs your feverish imaginings.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 3/8/2015 10:08:28 AM >

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: More Racism.... - 3/8/2015 10:29:11 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

I rather think we have already slid down the slippery slope where over-thought skewed perceptions of a minority make for hardships for the majority.
The interpretation of symbols and names is a cultural thing.


Yes. And the name of the Washington team is considered offensive by many in our culture.

But...not by all in our culture nor the Native American culture for that matter:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-interior-secretary-surprised-redskins-team-name-not-changed/blogEntry?id=25261332&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redskinsfacts.com%2Fus-interior-secretary-finds-native-americans-not-offended-redskins-name

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/10/08/how-many-native-americans-think-redskins-is-a-slur/

http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2013/nov/02/real-reason-dont-mind-redskins-chargers-calkins/

*note to joether* these sources are not radical right-wing sources

In an interesting twist:
http://www.people.com/people/mobile/article/0,,20868707,00.html

As has been said, you have every right to be offended by something

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: More Racism.... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125